So... the question is, since I am planning to look at the market for
backup software for bigger systems, would it be reasonable for me to
include Retrospect in the candidate list? Is anyone on the list backing
up systems on this scale?
Any advice welcome.
Ian.
Hi Ian.
I run a Retrospect
TimDavid wrote:
it really pays to learn all of the "nooks and
crannies" of the program. I learned a lot of little things that really made
my life easier about 2 years after I started using Retrospect.
I'm a new Retrospect-user, and unlike you power-dudes working with
mega-gigs, I only need
Ilyes-
my _tiny_ little nook; probably not undocumented, but it sure took me a long
while to find, and when I did, it solved all my problems!:
The option to "Set source files' backup time" in a script was very useful
for me... you can then build a selector which only backs up files modified
I know this was discussed late last year but this still baffles me...
The PC takes ages to do a snapshot whereas the mac doesn't take
anytime. Shouldn't the PC gather all the information it needs at the
start when it's reading the disk or does it change a flag on the
files/folders to mark
We back up about 200 clients, half Mac, half Windows, including about a
dozen laptops. We have less data turnover than you do, however, and only
back up each client about once a week.
In no particular order, here are my comments on backing up medium-size
networks with Retrospect vis-a-vis other
At about 03/01/01 04:28 (GMT -1000), Tom Lawton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Now, if anyone could tell me how to get Retrospect to start a new (file)
storage set AUTOMATICALLY when a size limit is exceeded, that would be
great!
Concur! This one is very close to the top of my wishlist. I am
