Re: tape capacity

2000-10-20 Thread Matt Barkdull
Ok, explain to me...I took a 220MB system file and compressed it down to 28MB. Obviously this is lossless as I can recover individual files from within it that are things like extensions, fonts, etc. I admit, JPEG, MPEG, etc. are lossful, but modems have been doing v.42bis compression which is

Retro Mac And VXA Drive

2000-10-20 Thread Jim Coefield
Could we get an update from Dantz and Ecrix on the VXA/Retro Mac issue, as reported by MacIntouch, 10-20-00 (see below)? The post on MacIntouch goes a long way to explaining some of the problems I've been seeing with my VXA drive. If not for having just finishing rebuilding my LAN and upgradin

Re: tape capacity

2000-10-20 Thread Douglas K Wyman
One (compound) word: Lossless The compression methods that you are lusting after introduce errors (artifacts) into the resulting decompressed data. This may be acceptable for sound, photos and video but to totally unacceptable for storage of system files, programs and most other data. High level

Dantz needs a testimonial, please!

2000-10-20 Thread Eric Ullman
Hi there, I'm looking for some help, ASAP. A journalist from Smart Computing magazine would like to speak with a Retrospect administrator backing up between 20 and 100 client systems with our Windows version. Please contact me directly if you are willing to speak with a member of the press. [EM

RE: tape capacity

2000-10-20 Thread Thone, Bradley A (Sbcsi)
Just a point of information: JPEG compression schemes are called "lossy.". They achieve such high compression ratios because they throw out a LOT of information that human eyes don't care much about. Decompressing a JPEG will not (cannot) give you back the original picture. The information in the

RE: tape capacity

2000-10-20 Thread Thone, Bradley A (Sbcsi)
"Native" is the actual amount of data that the tape can theoretically store, before compression. A 12.0 Gig file should fit on a 12.0 Gig capacity tape. Suppose you are able to take a 16.0 Gig file and compress it down (using PKZIP or whatever) to 12.0 Gigs. Now that 16.0 Gig file can fit on the

Re: tape capacity

2000-10-20 Thread Philip Chonacky
One word Matt: Compression Native capacity is the amount of uncompressed data that will fit on the tape. The drive has a hardware-based compressor that squeezes the data as it streams from the SCSI port to the write mechanism. The amount the data gets compressed depends upon the characteristi

Re: tape capacity

2000-10-20 Thread Matt Barkdull
One word: Compression. Native capacities are with no compression. For example, your 12GB drive can hold up to 12GB of un-compressed data. Normal hardware compression can get up to 2:1 compression, giving a total maximum of 24GB. Reality check, I've been getting about 27GB onto a 20GB/40GB

tape capacity

2000-10-20 Thread matt holland
Hello, I'm new to this list and subscribed because I have a question I hope one of you will be able to answer for me. I'm using Retrospect 4.2 for Mac, backing up a total of three Mac Servers to an APS DAT drive. The tapes I use are Sony DDS3 125P which state a Native (I'm not sure what Native

Retrospect in Mac OS on OS X

2000-10-20 Thread Forbes Benning
Has anyone gotten Retrospect to see the MacOS running in OS X? When the test the IP address from the Retrospect server, it 'sees' the machine. However, when I try to connect to it directly for backups, it does not see it. Is there a workaround? __