Onstream FW30 - Error 105 Device Problem

2001-03-05 Thread Phil Geller
Title: Onstream FW30 - Error 105 Device Problem



Does anyone know what to make of an Error 105 - Device Problem? We're using
an Onstream FW30 drive. The problem seems to occur only when a backup is
scheduled, not when it is done on-demand. Originally we were running Mac OS
8.6 and old FireWire drivers. We updated to Mac OS 9.04 and FireWire
drivers 2.5, but the problem persists.

Puzzled,

Phil Geller
WorkingMacs
Macintosh Consulting for the Small Office and Home Office
voice: 650 493-8689
fax: 650 493-8587







Onstream FW30 - Error 105 Device Problem

2001-03-05 Thread Phil Geller

Does anyone know what to make of an Error 105 - Device Problem?  We're using
an Onstream FW30 drive.  The problem seems to occur only when a backup is
scheduled, not when it is done on-demand.  Originally we were running Mac OS
8.6 and old FireWire drivers.  We updated to Mac OS 9.04 and FireWire
drivers 2.5, but the problem persists.

Puzzled,

Phil Geller
WorkingMacs
Macintosh Consulting for the Small Office and Home Office
voice: 650 493-8689
fax:   650 493-8587



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Search:  http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Backing up a Butler SQL Server

2000-12-13 Thread Phil Geller

A client is using a Butler SQL Server to support a Panorama database.  This
database stores data in RAM.  I would like to Retrospect server, running on
the same system to shut it down, so that the data is flushed to a file,
before the backup starts.  Butler SQL is not Apple Scriptable (at least
without an optional add-on, which may not be available for this version... I
haven't researched that yet.)

Does anyone have thoughts on the best way to deal with this?  What I've done
for now is shutdown and restarted the server just before the backup begins.
If it works that should update the database file.


Phil Geller
WorkingMacs
Macintosh Consulting for the Small Office and Home Office
voice: 650 493-8689
fax:   650 493-8587



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Re: Opinions of Onstream Echo drives

2000-11-10 Thread Phil Geller

I've installed 7 of these:  5 SCSI and 2 USB.  Overall I'd say they work
well.  All 7 clients continue to use them.  Most the calls I get is about
understanding Retrospect (but that's another discussion).  The problems I've
seen with the Onstream include:

- The drive doesn't always see a new tape after a tape swap.  The 1.08
firmware was supposed to resolve this, but it hasn't totally. The workaround
is simple.  Turn the drive off and on.  That seems to clear it.

- One USB drive was defective.  It was replaced, and I got Onstream to throw
in a free cleaning cartridge in retribution.

- One tape was defective (out of about 20 I've used so far). It broke.  It
was replaced by Onstream.  Unfortunately it was for the same client who had
the bad USB drive.  He wasn't real happy. But the system is know working for
him (though he still hasn't paid me!!).

- At first their Tech Support knew nothing about Macs.  I think that's
getting better.  I won't give their Tech support high marks.  It took them
about an hour to acknowledge that the USB drive was bad.  They didn't have
equipment at hand to check out my problem.

Bottom line is I continue to use them and recommend them.  I don't see
anything else at this price point which is competitive.  My clients are
unwilling to spend over $1000 for an VXA-1.  And my success with Travan
isn't much better.

Phil Geller
WorkingMacs
voice: 650 493-8689
fax:   650 493-8587

on 11/8/00 6:39 PM, Joel Moore at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We've been backing up to Onstream's Echo drives (DI30: IDE, 15GB) with mixed
 results.  I like these drives (price is nice, IDE interface) but lately I've
 been wondering about the quality.
 
 Two out of the three we've purchased so far were plagued by bad media errors
 (-206) in Retrospect.  I tried different tapes and in fact the tapes that
 resulted in the errors worked fine on the third tape drive.
 
 Has anyone else had experience with these drives?  What's your opinion?  We
 have another one on order but I think that will be the last if this happens
 again.
 
 I was thrilled by the idea that I could have 4 or 5 of these working
 together for the price of 1 DAT drive so I'll be disappointed if it turns
 out they are junk.
 
 I know this isn't technically a Retrospect question so feel free to blast me
 but I figured this would be the best place to ask this question.
 
 Joel Moore
 DCI Systems, Inc.
 
 
 --
 --
 To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
 
 For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Re: Password Protection

2000-11-07 Thread Phil Geller

I have a client who wants to secure only some personnel files, but not
everything, so anyone on the staff can restore their own files should they
need to. But the secured files could only be restored using a password. It
sounds like Retrospects security applies to the entire Backup Set or the
Retrospect application.  Am I right in thinking that to accomplish what they
need they will need to lock the files before backing up?


Phil Geller
WorkingMacs
voice: 650 493-8689
fax:   650 493-8587


on 11/6/00 10:08 AM, Irena Solomon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 For details on Retrospect's security options, see Tech Note 310 at:
 
 http://www.dantz.com/index.php3?SCREEN=technotes
 
 I've outlined the basics below.
 
 There are four areas of security within Retrospect and its client software:
 
 -The Retrospect application password
 -Backup Set password protection and encryption
 -Client security codes
 -Network (Link) Encryption
 
 The first two deal with securing the application and the data in your backup
 set.
 
 Retrospect Application Password prevents unauthorized personnel from using
 the Retrospect application. It requires that the user type in a password
 when Retrospect launches or when the user tries to halt an operation in
 unattended mode.
 
 Backup Set Encryption can be set to three levels when securing a new Backup
 Set:
 
 - Password Only (no encryption): The data itself is unchanged, but a
 password is required whenever the Backup Set is accessed.
 
 - SimpleCrypt (fast): SimpleCrypt provides commercial-level security without
 appreciably slowing the backup process on all but the slowest computers.
 
 - DES (more secure): DES (Data Encryption Standard) is an advanced form of
 data encryption that achieves bank-level security. The effect on backup
 speed is entirely dependent on the processor, but may take three to four
 times as long as an equivalent backup to a Backup Set that is not encrypted.
 
 Retrospect can store the Backup Set password for you so you do not always
 have to enter it to use the Backup Set. Go to ConfigureBackup Sets, select
 the desired Backup Set, click Configure, and then click the Options tab. You
 may select from the following:
 
 - Ask for any access: Retrospect will prompt the user to enter the Backup
 Set's password, preventing unattended operation.
 
 - Save for scripted access (default): The password is not required for
 scheduled executions of scripts, but Retrospect still requires that the user
 enter the password for all other uses of the Backup Set.
 
 - Save for any access: You will never be asked for the password unless the
 configuration file is moved, deleted, or lost.
 
 HTH,
 
 Irena Solomon
 Dantz Technical Support
 
 
 From: Tim David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Retrospect also allows you to password protect an archive. When you create a
 new
 backup set, there is a button that says secure.  I just use the password only
 so
 I don't know what the other two choices offer. (the second choice sounds like
 basic encryption and the third choice sounds like even better encryption but
 slower.  I keep my tapes in a secure area so I feel comfortable just using
 the
 password protection.
 
 If you really wanted to be picky, you could use a combination of these ideas
 and
 have to enter a password several times.  I would test this idea before you
 implement it though. Who know what multiple encryption would do.
 
 
 
 Jim Cowing wrote:
 
 Or you could just compress the files into a stuffit archive with password
 protection, then back them up. I am surprised Powerpoint doesn't have built
 in password protection the way Excel does.
 
 Jim Cowing
 Systems Engineer
 Target Corporation
 
 From: Don Foy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I am trying to archive files (mostly powerpoint) from the server to a
 cd.  The data contained is highly confidential.  I was wondering if
 Retrospect is capable of password protecting files during an archive
 process.  What I am hoping to find is that once the files are archived,
 to open the files, you must know the password.  If Retrospect does not
 have these capabilities, is there any other programs available to do
 this?  Setup:  Blue and White G3, Retrospect 4.2, lots of RAM, up to date
 firmware.  Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
 
 
 
 --
 --
 To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
 
 For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Backing up a remote site over DSL

2000-11-07 Thread Phil Geller

How feasible is it to backup a remote office over a DSL line?  A client has
a backup server at their main office and a remote site with 3 Macs.  Each
office has DSL.  Assuming we can get through the firewalls, and get static
IPs at the remote site, is it just a matter of entering the remote IPs in
the Client configuration window?  Has anyone tried this?


Phil Geller
WorkingMacs
voice: 650 493-8689
fax:   650 493-8587



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



Re: Client not visible

2000-09-15 Thread Phil Geller

on 9/14/00 9:13 PM, Pam Lefkowitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm experiencing similar behavior between an PowerMac G3 (platinum) server
 and a G4 client.
 snip
 
 Any fresh ideas out there?
 
 Hiya Phil,
 
 Have you installed the ethernet update (and maybe the firmware update)
 for the G4? 
 
 Pam
 

I haven't, but in reading the descriptions the problems these fix don't seem
to apply.  The G4 is not running Mac OS 9.  And there aren't any old
ethernet devices on this very small network.

But if nothing else helps, sure -- why not?

Phil



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Puzzler

2000-09-04 Thread Phil Geller

It sounds like you ran into the same problem I did.  Here's the speculation
I posted on:

on 8/24/00 7:36 AM, Phil Geller at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I guess I'll answer my own question.  The problem was accompanied by error
 206 (drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc).  So it must be
 that when Retrospect thinks a tape or disk is bad, it stops the backup and
 waits for another media.
 
 Phil Geller
 WorkingMacs
 voice: 650 493-8689
 fax:   650 493-8587
 
 
 on 8/22/00 8:54 AM, Phil Geller at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 In the last couple of days I've seen two installation where backups fail
 because Retrospect wants another media.  Even though the tape or disk
 weren't full, the Summary window for the Backup Set said "Appending requires
 another member".  In one case we were backing up to Onstream ADR tapes.  The
 tape only had about 3.5GB on it, and it holds about 15 GB.  The other was a
 Orb Disk using Retrospect Express.  It also was _way_ below capacity.  In at
 least one case I know the media wasn't marked missing.  I'm not sure about
 the second case.
 
 Any ideas what's happening?

on 8/25/00 10:34 AM, Matt Barkdull at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 My new system has worked great for the past 4 months.  No flaws at all.
 
 PowerMac 9600/G4 (upgrade)
 Asante 10/100 card
 192MB RAM
 OS 9.0.4
 Retrospect 4.3
 Quantum 4000 DLT
 
 
 Every night it backs up about 10 machines.  The other night it gave
 me a sense code error that related to dirty heads, so I cleaned the
 heads and put the tape back in to continue the incremental backup.
 
 I use a backup server and have a single active script.  It suppose to
 start at 8:30pm and wrap up at 6:30am.
 
 Here is what the log said:
 --
 
 8/21/2000 8:38:17 PM: Connected to ADMINPC
 Trouble writing: "1-IARC Server August 2000" (4242810240), error 206
 (drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc.).
 Additional error information for device "DLT 20.0 DC" [1:6],
 Sense  f0 00 03 00 00 00 40 15 00 18 e0 27 11 00 00 00 00 00 80 00
 (Quantum |DLT4000 |D991)
 8/22/2000 7:00:01 AM: Script execution terminated at specified stop time.
 8/22/2000 7:00:01 AM: Execution incomplete
 Remaining: 93 files, 13.9 MB
 Completed: 9 files, 981 KB
 Performance: 0.1 MB/minute
 Duration: 10:21:44 (00:00:51 idle/loading/preparing)
 
 -8/22/2000 9:52 AM: Backup Server stopped
 Quit at 8/22/2000 9:54 AM
 
 --  I cleaned the heads at this point. -
 
 Retrospect version 4.3
 launch at 8/22/2000 9:55 AM
 +Advanced Driver Kit, version 1.8
 
 +8/22/2000 9:59 AM: Backup Server started
 
 -8/24/2000 10:06 AM: Backup Server stopped
 Quit at 8/24/2000 10:18 AM
 
 
 Retrospect version 4.3
 launch at 8/24/2000 4:40 PM
 +Advanced Driver Kit, version 1.8
 
 +8/24/2000 4:41 PM: Backup Server started
 
 -8/24/2000 4:42 PM: Backup Server stopped
 
 +8/24/2000 4:43 PM: Backup Server started
 
 -8/25/2000 9:24 AM: Backup Server stopped
 
 
 
 As you can see, it's not saying that it is even trying to execute the
 script.  The script is active during the specified time.
 
 When I look in 'CONFIGURE-BACKUP SET-Current Backup Set' it tells
 me under Available "appending requires another member".
 
 So I'm sure that the tape is full, but my question is, why doesn't
 the log tell me this?  Or at least that the script failed to execute
 because of an error.  Looking at the log gave me no clue of what was
 going on after I cleaned the head.
 
 
 
 



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Media Full Before It's Time

2000-08-22 Thread Phil Geller

In the last couple of days I've seen two installation where backups fail
because Retrospect wants another media.  Even though the tape or disk
weren't full, the Summary window for the Backup Set said "Appending requires
another member".  In one case we were backing up to Onstream ADR tapes.  The
tape only had about 3.5GB on it, and it holds about 15 GB.  The other was a
Orb Disk using Retrospect Express.  It also was _way_ below capacity.  In at
least one case I know the media wasn't marked missing.  I'm not sure about
the second case.

Any ideas what's happening?

Phil Geller
WorkingMacs
voice: 650 493-8689
fax:   650 493-8587



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]