Erik Grinaker wrote:
So I actually think that using multiple data files, as you're doing now,
is both simpler and more elegant than adding lots of cruft (code-wise
and UI-wise) to basically achieve the same effect.
Using two files is certainly simpler, code-wise, but IMO it's less
elegant.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 22:46 +1100, Tony and Robyn Lewis wrote:
> Erik Grinaker wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 09:27 +1100, Tony and Robyn Lewis wrote:
> >
> > > 1. My main concern with something like Revelation (other than strength
> > > of cryptography of the encrypted file) is having *all*
Erik Grinaker wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 09:27 +1100, Tony and Robyn Lewis wrote:
1. My main concern with something like Revelation (other than strength
of cryptography of the encrypted file) is having *all* your passwords,
in the clear, in memory, when you've unlocked Revelati
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 09:27 +1100, Tony and Robyn Lewis wrote:
> Erik Grinaker wrote:
> >I've started working on a new file format for version 0.5.0 of
> >Revelation, and would like to get some comments on it before I go ahead
> >and implement it.
>
> 1. My main concern with something like Revelati
Erik Grinaker wrote:
I've started working on a new file format for version 0.5.0 of
Revelation, and would like to get some comments on it before I go ahead
and implement it.
Thanks, Erik, for all your work. Revelation is a nice tool.
1. My main concern with something like Revelation (othe
I've started working on a new file format for version 0.5.0 of
Revelation, and would like to get some comments on it before I go ahead
and implement it.
So far I've completed a proposal for the encryption process. If anyone
sees any problems with it, or has suggestions for improvements, please
let
