Hi everyone,
We just released Review Board 1.5! A lot went into this release, and I think
it turned out really well.
Rather than repeat the news post, I'll just link it:
http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2010/09/30/review-board-15-released/
And remember: We're trying to get people to join us for
Fantastic! Thanks! I will try to send fixed ClearCase implementation to review.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
We just released Review Board 1.5! A lot went into this release, and I think
it turned out really well.
Rather than
On Sep 30, 11:23 am, D Krueger dekr...@gmail.com wrote:
This is on Fedora 10 with Django 1.1.1.
Just as an aside, you know that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life in
December of last year, right? It's not a safe platform to deploy any
server on, as it no longer receives security patches or
Hey Christian,
Upgraded. A grand 'thank you for all the work but in to this' from
here!
Have a nice weekend
- Jeppe
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 09:15, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We just released Review Board 1.5! A lot went into this release, and I think
it turned out really well.
Congratulations and thanks a lot for the continued effort of all contributors!
Regards,
Thilo
--
Want to help the
Hi folks.
Short description: Trying to set up new install of RB 1.0.9 on SLES
10.3. After creating a reviewboard, httpd is crashing, apparently
during user authentication. I doubt the problem is RB directly--more
likely an issue with python interfacing to MySQL. Anyone seen this,
or know how
I've tracked down the source of the problem, but I don't know of a
solution (if there is one).
I invoked rb-site on the test site we created when first testing
1.0.5.
It worked perfectly.
So I started using pdb to investigate where rb-site was failing on our
standard site, which led me to:
I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on a test server I have. I did get
it going, but I have a quick question that I couldn't find any answers
for in google or elsewhere.
I'm seeing these files missing in my apache logs:
actions.min.js - ?
jquery.init.js - ?
jquery.min.js
I'm presuming the last is
I have no idea what actions.min.js is, as nothing of ours uses or ships
that. Same with jquery.init.js.
We use jquery-1.3.2.min.js. Are you specifically seeing jquery.min.js?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -
Sorry, I realized what this was just after I posted it.
This is Django's admin UI, needing some bundled flies. We've historically
shipped a copy of their admin files, but we shouldn't be doing that anymore
(and I'll fix this for a 1.5.x.). The copy of the files we ship are too
outdated for some
Ah! That seems to have done the trick. Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Sorry, I realized what this was just after I posted it.
This is Django's admin UI, needing some bundled flies. We've historically
shipped a copy of their admin files,
I was following the instructions on
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/
And at the setup Reviewboard stage:
python ./contrib/internal/prepare-dev.py
I got :
Error: No module named django_evolution
I worked around it by issuing:
python setup.py develop
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1837 by Karrde712: requires.txt in the ReviewBoard .egg-info
specifies djblets 0.5.7
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1837
What version are you running?
ReviewBoard 1.5
ReviewBoard 1.5 shold require
Comment #1 on issue 1837 by chipx86: requires.txt in the
ReviewBoard .egg-info specifies djblets 0.5.7
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1837
That file is built when running setup.py install, develop, egg_info, or
other commands.
I imagine your RPM spec file isn't
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1838 by bmgcolorado: HTTP mail is broken
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1838
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What version are you running?
1.5
What's the URL of the
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1839 by sum...@yelp.com: File mode changes do not appear in the
diff viewer
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1839
There is nothing in the diff viewer to indicate file mode changes. Perhaps
the
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 1838 by chipx86: HTTP mail is broken
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1838
This looks like a stale caching issue. Clear your server cache and it
should go away. Please let me know if it doesn't.
--
You received this
Comment #15 on issue 477 by chipx86: Per reviewer email control
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=477
This probably depends on whether or not you're using mailing lists. In the
case of a mailing list, you want an e-mail going to the list, and in most
cases that implies
Comment #16 on issue 477 by chipx86: Per reviewer email control
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=477
Another thought: Every bug tracker I've used has sent me an e-mail when I
file a bug. That's not much different from what Review Board does. Do
people have the same
19 matches
Mail list logo
