On 10/11/2013 06:44 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
Last night's releases were a bit bumpier than we like, due to a
regression in Djblets, in Review Board, and in a third-party tool we
used for packaging. All in all, comedy of errors, and hopefully it
didn't bite too many people.
Comment #5 on issue 1524 by vzeit...@gmail.com: postreview.py should ignore
user configuration when generating diffs.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1524
It would be really great to get any reply about this because it's annoying
to have to change this in every new
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3108 by inebriec...@gmail.com: APIErrors return 403 but do not
log anything
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3108
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 3109 by inebriec...@gmail.com: permissions to submit review
request
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3109
*** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com
*** If you have a
Updates:
Status: New
Comment #6 on issue 1524 by trowb...@gmail.com: postreview.py should ignore
user configuration when generating diffs.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1524
I'm sorry, we missed the earlier comment.
--
You received this message because this
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 3109 by chip...@gmail.com: permissions to submit review
request
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3109
The can change status should be the appropriate permission. If that's not
working, then there's a bug.
Are you
Comment #8 on issue 1524 by emil@gmail.com: postreview.py should ignore
user configuration when generating diffs.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1524
If I recall correctly, the original issue I saw is that someone can
configure external diff to run sort of
