Re: submitter has left company; how to change

David, We do have a prototype implementation of allowing people (including admins) to change the ownership of a review request, but for now, changing it in the Database section of the admin UI should work. You're right that you'll likely need to fix the open counts, which can be done by running

Re: submitter has left company; how to change

On my reviewboard instance, I just mark those review requests as discarded. Whoever is picking up this defect will then post a new review request with their diff. This accomplishes a few things: -keeps all the old history -is simple for me do -clear ownership of the change going forward Scott

RBTools 0.7.2 python3.4 build doesn't work ('no module named urllib2')

I'm running OpenSUSE 13.2, and by default it installs libreoffice with python 3.4. This causes 'easy_install RBTools' to install the python3.4 version instead of the 2.7 one. Unfortunately 'rbt post' subsequently fails with: rbt post ERROR: Could not load SCM Client tfs: No module named

Re: Issue 3824 in reviewboard: Git hooks not working

Comment #5 on issue 3824 by trowb...@gmail.com: Git hooks not working https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3824 This bug fix will ship in 0.7.3 -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust

Re: RBTools 0.7.2 python3.4 build doesn't work ('no module named urllib2')

Bruce, We're making progress on getting RBTools to be Python 3.x ready, but it's not there yet. Most of the time, when there are multiple versions of python installed, there will also be multiple versions of easy_install, so you can probably do `easy_install-2.7 RBTools` and it will work. -David

Re: Issue 3824 in reviewboard: Git hooks not working

Comment #4 on issue 3824 by kdari...@gmail.com: Git hooks not working https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3824 I am facing the same issue RBT version is as below $ rbt --version RBTools 0.7.2 (RBTools-0.7.2-1.el6.noarch) Upgraded rbtools as well but no luck .. $ git push

subvertpy import error

I've installed ReviewBoard 2.0.15 and am having an issue with the svn backend. I get the following error: [Fri May 22 14:47:01.904441 2015] [wsgi:error] [pid 1114:tid 140027266852608] File

Re: Review Board Setup issue RHEL7

python-Whoosh 2.6 is not available on RHEL 7 yet. The Review Board package does not strictly need it, so in the EPEL 7 version of Review Board, I dropped that requirement. If you're installing on RHEL 7, you'll have the best luck if you follow

Review Board Setup issue RHEL7

I just completed Review Board set-up, but getting following error in apache web server: [Fri May 22 13:17:47.175095 2015] [core:notice] [pid 23324] SELinux policy enabled; httpd running as context system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 [Fri May 22 13:17:47.176057 2015] [suexec:notice] [pid 23324]

Problem of rbt0.7.2

Client OS: Windows7 64 Review board: 2.0.15 Server OS: Centos6.6 64 rtb.exe: 0.7.2 H:\practise\reviewboard\testrbt setup-repo -d RBTools 0.7.2 Python 2.7.6 (default, Nov 10 2013, 19:24:18) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] Running on Windows-7-6.1.7601-SP1 Home =

ReviewBoard subversion cert authentication.

How would I set reviewboard up to use cert based subversion authentication? I have the .subversion folder set up correctly for the user that apache is running as (revboard), but it's not picking up the cert. Is there some type of configuration that I need to do for reviewboard to know where to

Re: Problem of rbt0.7.2

Hi, This bug has already been fixed in git and will ship in 0.7.3 (which is coming soon). -David On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:32 AM Jam kamaliang2...@gmail.com wrote: Client OS: Windows7 64 Review board: 2.0.15 Server OS: Centos6.6 64 rtb.exe: 0.7.2 H:\practise\reviewboard\testrbt