Re: Help, upgrading to 2.0.7 broke my server!

I just ran into the same problem upgrading from 2.0.6 to 2.0.8. Running postgres as well In prostgres dropping the index is achieved by: DROP index scmtools_repository_8c446842; running rb-site upgrade again after that completed successfully On Tuesday, 16 September 2014 13:44:48 UTC+12,

New incremental indexing command in reviewboard 2.0.3 fails to execute

Hi, I upgraded to 2.0.3 and put the new incremental index upgrade into the crontab but it didn't seem to work. So for testing I executed this on the command line: rb-site manage /var/www/codereview update_index -a 1 and got this error: rb-site: error: no such option: -a I noticed the same

Re: New incremental indexing command in reviewboard 2.0.3 fails to execute

. -David On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Christian Wuerdig christia...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi, I upgraded to 2.0.3 and put the new incremental index upgrade into the crontab but it didn't seem to work. So for testing I executed this on the command line: rb-site manage /var/www

Re: Unable to view SVN diff after migration from 1.7.x to 2.0.1

I've had a similar issue intermittently. Adding windows-1252 to the list of encodings mentioned by David fixed the issue On 3/06/2014 5:42 AM, Roudaille77 rudy.he...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have just updated my ReviewBoard site but I can't visualize the Subversion diff anymore... I can see

How to configure the search properly

Hi, We always had trouble with the search largely due to this bug: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2544 Now with 2.0 I tried the search again and it worked a little bit better - instead of coming up with an error 500 I always got No results So I figured maybe I need to

Re: Search fails with HTTP 500

Sounds like this problem: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2544 Shouldn't this be added as fix to RB instead of having individuals patching it? I don't really like running a custom patched version. This always gets you into trouble when upgrading. Cheers Christian On

Re: Search fails with HTTP 500

I have the same issue. I logged it in the issue tracker a while back and someone pointed me to a different issue with some workaround/fix but I haven't got around trying it. Don't have the link right now but if you check in the tracker you should find it otherwise I can send it tomorrow. Cheers

Slight glitch in upgrade to 1.7.9

Hi, I just upgraded from 1.7.6 to 1.7.9 and got the following error when trying to view the diffs of any review request: _log() got an unexpected keyword argument 'request' Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: Slight glitch in upgrade to 1.7.9

...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Jun 4, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Christian Wuerdig christia...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi, I just upgraded from 1.7.6 to 1.7.9 and got the following error when trying to view

Re: Upgrading to 1.7.1 results in weird timestamps

...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Christian Wuerdig christia...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Some additional info: The time zone under General in Reviewboard is set to Pacific/Auckland

Re: Upgaded from 1.6.3 to 1.7.1 - Styles missing

-- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Christian Wuerdig christia...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Thanks - this had me my head scratching for a while. Is this something

Re: Ready VM or Recommended distribution for Review Board 1.7

I installed it on a Ubuntu following http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/ step by step using MySQL as backend. No problems encountered. Hope this helps. On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 6:20:15 AM UTC+13, Erik Putrycz wrote: Are there any downloadable appliances

Re: Upgaded from 1.6.3 to 1.7.1 - Styles missing

Thanks - this had me my head scratching for a while. Is this something which is supposed to happen automatically under normal circumstances? Because I can't find any documentation about it. For the record: I upgraded from 1.6.13 to 1.7.1 on a Ubuntu 12.04. Cheers Christian On Friday, January

Upgrading to 1.7.1 results in weird timestamps

Hi, after the upgrade to 1.7.1 we can see strange timestamps in the dashboard: Like: Posted January 7th, 2013, 2 p.m. Last Updated: 11 hours, 19 minutes from now In the REST API for that request: last_updated2013-01-07T14:08:21Z/last_updated time_added2013-01-07T14:00:10Z/time_added

Re: Upgrading to 1.7.1 results in weird timestamps

Some additional info: The time zone under General in Reviewboard is set to Pacific/Auckland If I modify a review request now I get this: Last Updated Jan. 7, 2013, 3:08 a.m. Cheers Christian On Monday, January 7, 2013 3:51:21 PM UTC+13, Christian Wuerdig wrote: Hi, after the upgrade

Upgrade problem 1.6.6 to 1.6.9 with MySql

Hi, I tried to upgrade review board from 1.6.6 to 1.6.9 but `rb-site upgrade` spit some errors like _mysql_exceptions. OperationalError: (1005, Can't create table 'reviewboard.#sql-2a4_3' (errno: 150)) A google search led me to an older post in this group:

Re: Diff fie size limited to 1 MB

Hi Christian, we just hit that issue here by some reviews missing the diff files. In general this is caused when someone works on a feature branch in the repository and then merges in the changes from the trunk. Although it is supposed to happen regularly sometimes there can be two or three

Re: Diff fie size limited to 1 MB

Sorry, ignore that, just realized that it is configurable since 1.6.7 On Friday, June 22, 2012 3:51:56 PM UTC+12, Christian Wuerdig wrote: Hi Christian, we just hit that issue here by some reviews missing the diff files. In general this is caused when someone works on a feature branch