Re: Role of scmtool.py
Hi Christian Thank you for your reply. I'm trying to implement the SCMTools for one of the repositories that I work with. I'm trying to figure out what exactly it is that reviewboard wants with this class. How should my implementation be for reviewboard to talk to it? Thanks Albert On Jun 20, 10:20 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Albert, The SCMTool class is the communication layer between Review Board and the repositories. Every supported source code management system (Git, Subversion, etc.) have a corresponding SCMTool class. Primarily, the class has a few main purposes: downloading files (based on path and revision) from a repository, and parsing the diff (using a custom DiffParser subclass) for revision information (and any special metadata that's useful). There are some other things it does as well, though, particularly in 1.5. For example, checking if a repository path points to a valid repository, converting a SCM-specific revision string into a normalized Review Board revision indicator, checking if a file at all exists in a repository, and a few other small things. Without knowing your needs, I can't say much. However, if you look at the other SCMTool classes, you should have some good examples to work from. In Review Board, any bundled SCMTool must live in the scmtools directory, and the module path must be included in setup.py. To get a development environment to recognize it, you'd run './reviewboard/manage.py registerscmtools'. If you're using a production environment with this tool, you can either build your own package from your development tree, or package your SCMTool as a third-party Python egg, add lines in your setup.py file based on the SCMTool lines in Review Board's setup.py, install your package, and do an rb-site upgrade on your site. Christian On Thursday, June 17, 2010, Albert albert.geo...@gmail.com wrote: I need to understand the role of SCMTool class and how a class inheriting from this should be implmented. Any information will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Albert -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Loops when trying to add a svn repository
Thanks Christian! I' ve missed the apache user credentials on .subversion folder!! Issue resolved!!! On 21 jun, 15:55, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi, It's possible that it wasn't able to store the certificate. This is stored in $HOME/.subversion, and this would be your web server's home directory. Starting in Review Board 1.5, we generate Apache + mod_python config files (assuming that's what you're using) that point HOME to $sitedir/data. Make sure your config file does this. You can add it with a: SetEnv HOME /var/www/mysite/data Near the other SetEnv lines. Also make sure your data directory is owned by the Apache user. Christian On Monday, June 21, 2010, Martelo martel...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to add an https SVN repository. After click on save, the folowing message is shown... A verified HTTPS certificate is required to connect to this repository. There were errors validating this certificate: The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the fingerprint to validate the certificate manually. ... ... with the following options: I trust this host and Re edit repository. So far so good, but when I click on I trust this host, RB enters an infinite loop. The error message is: ERROR - SVN: Failed to get repository information forhttps://myserver/repo: OPTIONS of 'https://myserver/repo':Server certificate verification failed: issuer is not trusted (https://myserver) I'm using RB1.5 beta 2+ Apache 2.2 + Ubuntu... I'm able to perform a SVB checkout with both root and www-data users... I'm not sure why the certificate is not issued by a trusted authority message is still been shown. Does anyone have this problem? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com- Ocultar texto das mensagens anteriores - - Mostrar texto das mensagens anteriores - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
installing on ubuntu 10.04
Hi, I was trying to install reviewboard on a ubuntu 10.04 using memcached as suggested. Everything went right until the point of creating the database. I chose mysql. I get the following output File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.6.egg/ django/core/cache/backends/memcached.py, line 19, in module raise InvalidCacheBackendError(Memcached cache backend requires either the 'memcache' or 'cmemcache' library) django.core.cache.backends.base.InvalidCacheBackendError: Memcached cache backend requires either the 'memcache' or 'cmemcache' library I'm pretty sure I installed memcached and that it is running. What should I do to fix this? Thank you Kelly -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Unable to submit reviews via post-review after svn switch --relocate
Hi,
We recently moved our svn server (or at least the DNS alias was
changed). Every developer did an svn switch --relocate old_location
new_location. The reviewboard server was updated too so that the new
paths were associated with recognized repositories.
Reviews submitted via the web interface have no problems. However, if
I use post-review I get the following error:
Error creating review request: The repository path specified is not in
the list of known repositories (code 206)
The debug output from post-review is as follows:
svn info
repository info: Path: http://new.server.com/path/to/repo, Base path:
/trunk, Supports changesets: False
svn propget reviewboard:url /home/revane/work
svn diff --diff-cmd=diff
Looking for 'local.reviewboard.server.com /' cookie in
/home/revane/.post-review-cookies.txt
Loaded valid cookie -- no login required
Attempting to create review request for None
HTTP GETting /api/json/repositories/
HTTP GETting /api/json/repositories/3/info/
HTTP GETting /api/json/repositories/4/info/
HTTP GETting /api/json/repositories/5/info/
HTTP GETting /api/json/repositories/1/info/
repository info: Path: http://new.server.com/path/to/repo, Base path:
/trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP POSTing to
http://local.reviewboard.server.com/api/json/reviewrequests/new/:
{'repository_path': u'http://new.server.com/path/to/repo'}
Error creating review request: The repository path specified is not in
the list of known repositories (code 206)
So it appears that the correct repository path is being sent. For some
reason the server is refusing it. Is there a cache in the server
configuration that needs to be wiped? Is JSON stuff cached somewhere
(perhaps even on the client) and this needs to be wiped? Is there more
debug options I can try to help identify the problem? Any help would
be appreciated. I'd love to be using post-review again.
Edwin V
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: installing on ubuntu 10.04
On 06/22/2010 08:52 AM, kgoedert wrote: Hi, I was trying to install reviewboard on a ubuntu 10.04 using memcached as suggested. Everything went right until the point of creating the database. I chose mysql. I get the following output File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.2.1-py2.6.egg/ django/core/cache/backends/memcached.py, line 19, inmodule raise InvalidCacheBackendError(Memcached cache backend requires either the 'memcache' or 'cmemcache' library) django.core.cache.backends.base.InvalidCacheBackendError: Memcached cache backend requires either the 'memcache' or 'cmemcache' library I'm pretty sure I installed memcached and that it is running. What should I do to fix this? Thank you Kelly In addition to the memcache daemon, you also need the python memcache client library. I'm not sure what they call it on Ubuntu, but on Fedora it would be 'python-memcache' -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Issue 1696 in reviewboard: Disallow closing review as submitted without getting Ship it
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 1696 by hadru...@gmail.com: Disallow closing review as submitted without getting Ship it http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1696 If closing as submitted was blocked before the review gets any ship it!, it would be easier not to overlook unresolved issues. possible issues: - review may need a ship it from more than one person - review may get ship it only for the part of the code Anyway, I feel, that not closing review as submitted should not take place before the changes get at least one ship it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1697 in reviewboard: tok tori
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 1697 by chipx86: tok tori http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1697 You're on the wrong issue tracker. This is for the Review Board project. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 1698 in reviewboard: REview BORAD SCIUKs
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1698 by allang: REview BORAD SCIUKs http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1698 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? What's the URL of the page containing the problem? What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. 2. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? What operating system are you using? What browser? Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1698 in reviewboard: REview BORAD SCIUKs
Comment #3 on issue 1698 by chipx86: REview BORAD SCIUKs http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1698 Now we're all http://i.imgur.com/uGTKb.jpg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1698 in reviewboard: REview BORAD SCIUKs
Comment #5 on issue 1698 by carmiendo: REview BORAD SCIUKs http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1698 Who's your employer? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1698 in reviewboard: REview BORAD SCIUKs
Comment #7 on issue 1698 by russell.bryant: REview BORAD SCIUKs http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1698 I could really use someone on my team with this kind of spelling ability and clue about how the internet works. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1698 in reviewboard: REview BORAD SCIUKs
Comment #9 on issue 1698 by russell.bryant: REview BORAD SCIUKs http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1698 resu...@foxnews.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
