Re: Error in installing Review Board
Hi, I am using Python 2.6 which i suppose should be fine and should not conflict with the issues of using Python 2.4. Rohan. On Jun 9, 5:37 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > I should point out (we'll make an official announcement when the time comes, > though it'll be a while) that RB 1.6 is likely going to be the last release > to support Python 2.4. Django has a Python deprecation schedule that we'll > be following. So ideally, people should make sure they can use newer > versions of Python. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Jan Koprowski wrote: > > > > > > > > > Stephen, > > > If You can run Python 2.4 - this is not the case because of really > > nice setup.py maintaining all necessary Python dependencies. > > VirtualEnv solve almost all problems - only incompatible with mod_wsgi > > Apache could be a problem. > > Sometimes You must run something on very old machine and upgrading it > > is not the case because sometimes you are not owner of machine :) > > > Regards, > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:42 -0700, ROAAN wrote: > > >> Hi, > > > >> I am installing ReviewBoard on my machine running Fedora 10. I seem to > > > > It's worth noting that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life almost two > > > years ago, so you're probably going to run into difficulty installing > > > ANY new software on it. > > > > It would be prudent to upgrade to a supported operating system like > > > Fedora 14 or 15, or move to a long-term supported release like Red Hat > > > Enterprise Linux or CentOS. > > > > -- > > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > > -- > > ><> Jan Koprowski > > > -- > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error in installing Review Board
Rohan, Did You read and try: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/admin/installation/linux/ ? Regards, On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:35 PM, ROAAN wrote: > Hi, > > I am using Python 2.6 which i suppose should be fine and should not > conflict with the issues of using Python 2.4. > > Rohan. > > On Jun 9, 5:37 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: >> I should point out (we'll make an official announcement when the time comes, >> though it'll be a while) that RB 1.6 is likely going to be the last release >> to support Python 2.4. Django has a Python deprecation schedule that we'll >> be following. So ideally, people should make sure they can use newer >> versions of Python. >> >> Christian >> >> -- >> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com >> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org >> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Jan Koprowski >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Stephen, >> >> > If You can run Python 2.4 - this is not the case because of really >> > nice setup.py maintaining all necessary Python dependencies. >> > VirtualEnv solve almost all problems - only incompatible with mod_wsgi >> > Apache could be a problem. >> > Sometimes You must run something on very old machine and upgrading it >> > is not the case because sometimes you are not owner of machine :) >> >> > Regards, >> >> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher >> > wrote: >> > > On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:42 -0700, ROAAN wrote: >> > >> Hi, >> >> > >> I am installing ReviewBoard on my machine running Fedora 10. I seem to >> >> > > It's worth noting that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life almost two >> > > years ago, so you're probably going to run into difficulty installing >> > > ANY new software on it. >> >> > > It would be prudent to upgrade to a supported operating system like >> > > Fedora 14 or 15, or move to a long-term supported release like Red Hat >> > > Enterprise Linux or CentOS. >> >> > > -- >> > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at >> >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >> > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> > > For more options, visit this group at >> >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en >> >> > -- >> > ><> Jan Koprowski >> >> > -- >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at >> >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- ><> Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error in installing Review Board
Jan, Yes I have been following the exact sequence of steps outlined there. Actually, I have read it so many times that its memorized to me :-). Anyhow, one thing which I think might be causing the issue is that I am having "easy_install-2.6", "easy_install-2.5". Since the python version I am using is 2.6.1 so I tried installing using easy_install-2.6. The error trace that I posted above has the first warning as "warning: GMP library not found; Not building Crypto.PublicKey._fastmath", but I checked that is installed on my system as well. I am not sure about if i need to set up a path for it / some sort of link for my python environment to be aware about it. Thanks, Rohan. On Jun 10, 10:09 am, Jan Koprowski wrote: > Rohan, > > Did You read and > try:http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/admin/installation/linux/? > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:35 PM, ROAAN wrote: > > Hi, > > > I am using Python 2.6 which i suppose should be fine and should not > > conflict with the issues of using Python 2.4. > > > Rohan. > > > On Jun 9, 5:37 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > >> I should point out (we'll make an official announcement when the time > >> comes, > >> though it'll be a while) that RB 1.6 is likely going to be the last release > >> to support Python 2.4. Django has a Python deprecation schedule that we'll > >> be following. So ideally, people should make sure they can use newer > >> versions of Python. > > >> Christian > > >> -- > >> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > >> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > >> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Jan Koprowski > >> wrote: > > >> > Stephen, > > >> > If You can run Python 2.4 - this is not the case because of really > >> > nice setup.py maintaining all necessary Python dependencies. > >> > VirtualEnv solve almost all problems - only incompatible with mod_wsgi > >> > Apache could be a problem. > >> > Sometimes You must run something on very old machine and upgrading it > >> > is not the case because sometimes you are not owner of machine :) > > >> > Regards, > > >> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher > >> > wrote: > >> > > On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:42 -0700, ROAAN wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > > >> > >> I am installing ReviewBoard on my machine running Fedora 10. I seem to > > >> > > It's worth noting that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life almost two > >> > > years ago, so you're probably going to run into difficulty installing > >> > > ANY new software on it. > > >> > > It would be prudent to upgrade to a supported operating system like > >> > > Fedora 14 or 15, or move to a long-term supported release like Red Hat > >> > > Enterprise Linux or CentOS. > > >> > > -- > >> > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > >> >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > >> > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > >> > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >> > > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > >> > -- > >> > ><> Jan Koprowski > > >> > -- > >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > >> >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > > -- > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > -- > > > > > > > > ><> Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: IntegrityError
Hello all, For the record, my problem was caused by a corruption of our mysql backend. (ran out of spaceunbelievable, but I must come clean) I figured this out and then ran some mysqlcheck type of actions to repair. We are good now. Thank you all! Chris On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Christopher Hahn wrote: > Christian, > > I am seeing MySQL as our backend: > = > DATABASE_ENGINE = 'mysql' > DATABASE_NAME = 'reviewboard' > DATABASE_USER = 'reviewboard' > = > > ...and it is a perforce repository that we are working with here. > > Please let me know if this was not what you wanted to know. > > ...and I will try to analyze the dump as you suggest. > > Thank you very much for the kind attention, > > Christopher > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: >> The mcm errors shouldn't actually be related (though it may mean your >> memcached isn't working properly?). >> >> So it sounds like the database schema is correct and up-to-date. It's >> probably some double entry in the database then. >> >> What repository backing are you using? >> >> We need to find out what field the "NULL-1" is in (and what actually >> generated that). What you can try is to dump your database contents using >> mysqldump to a text file, then searching it for "NULL-1". It should reveal >> what field it's in. I can make more educated guesses after I know that. >> >> Christian >> >> -- >> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com >> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Christopher Hahn wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I did run the 'rb-site upgrade'. >>> >>> Can you confirm that I gave it the right path to RB? >>> >>> It does seem to have chewed on something, but I get errors, and >>> you see below. >>> >>> I may need to start with a fresh installbut if I cannot migrate >>> the data, then >>> I will be in a bad place. >>> >>> Thank you all so very much for taking the time. It is heartening to >>> have company. ;0) >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> === >>> root@servicemanager:/data2/ReviewBoard# rb-site upgrade /data2/ReviewBoard >>> Rebuilding directory structure >>> Updating database. This may take a while. >>> /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/MySQLdb/__init__.py:34: >>> DeprecationWarning: the sets module is deprecated >>> from sets import ImmutableSet >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.131383] mcm_server_connect():2302: Software caused >>> connection abort >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.131517] mcm_server_connect():2302: Software caused >>> connection abort >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.131573] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2333: >>> Software caused connection abort >>> [WARN@1307646025.131614] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2338 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.131676] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> Upgrading Review Board from 1.5 to 1.5.5 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.131902] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.132022] mcm_atomic_cmd():649 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.195105] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.195214] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.221598] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.221678] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.238188] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.238276] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.266242] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.266347] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.292776] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.292856] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.315523] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.315571] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.333410] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.333452] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.346766] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.346810] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.369352] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.369395] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.418996] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.419049] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.437399] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.437443] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.455682] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> [NOTICE@1307646025.455733] mcm_server_connect_next_avail():2328 >>> No fixtures found. >>> >>> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/pycrypto-2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: >>> RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which >>> is BROKEN in older releases. See >>> http://www.pycrypto.org/
1.6 beta 2 - email EOF error
Hi,
I just upgraded to 1.6 beta 2 porting my database over. I was using
1.5 before, with email working ok. I left the email settings intact,
using MS online services. The settings are -
Mail server: Smtp.mail.microsoftonline.com
Port: 587
[checked] Use TLS for authentication
I now get this error -
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] 2011-06-10 14:05:11,532 - ERROR -
Error sending e-mail notification with subject 'Review Request: Test
diff' on behalf of '*** sender removed ***' to '*** email addresses
removed ***')
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] Traceback (most recent call last):
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/notifications/
email.py", line 236, in send_review_mail
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] message.send()
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/message.py", line 251,
in send
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return
self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self])
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py", line
86, in send_messages
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sent = self._send(message)
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py", line
104, in _send
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error]
email_message.message().as_string())
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
smtplib.py", line 679, in sendmail
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] self.rset()
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
smtplib.py", line 449, in rset
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.docmd("rset")
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
smtplib.py", line 374, in docmd
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.getreply()
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
smtplib.py", line 348, in getreply
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] line = self.file.readline()
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
smtplib.py", line 160, in readline
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] chr = self.sslobj.read(1)
[Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sslerror: (8, 'EOF occurred in
violation of protocol')
Any thoughts? I tried this by posting a review from an old diff that
was in the database from 1.5. And I also submitted a new diff report
and got the same error.
Thanks,
Daryl
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
You appear to have a DNS problem: "Unable to determine IP address from host name for ." What does "nslookup " say? On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen wrote: > Hi, > > We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a > "requested URL could not be retrieved" error > > We're running: > > > ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP > Python 2.5.x > Apache 2.2.x > > Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10 > > Here is the output after adding the --debug option: > > -- > post-review --server=/ --username= -- > password= --revision-range=8325 --debug RBTools 0.3.2 Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data svn info diff --version repository info: Path: //, Base pa > th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False HTTP GETting api/ Got HTTP error: 503: >>> Transition > al//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> > > ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved > > > The requested URL could not be retrieved > > > While trying to retrieve the URL: > //api/ A> > > The following error was encountered: > > Unable to determine IP address from host name for > > > > > The dnsserver returned: > > Name Error: The domain name does not exist. > > > > This means that: > > The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL. > Check if the address is correct. > -- > > Thanks! > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- --tucker -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Hi Tucker, Thanks for the reply. I ran "nslookup " from both (XP server) and from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine. Both return Name: . Address: On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker wrote: > You appear to have a DNS problem: > > "Unable to determine IP address from host name for ." > > What does "nslookup " say? > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen wrote: > > Hi, > > > We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a > > "requested URL could not be retrieved" error > > > We're running: > > > ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP > > Python 2.5.x > > Apache 2.2.x > > > Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10 > > > Here is the output after adding the --debug option: > > > -- > > post-review --server=/ --username= -- > > password= --revision-range=8325 --debug > RBTools 0.3.2 > Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data > svn info > diff --version > repository info: Path: //, Base pa > > th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False > HTTP GETting api/ > Got HTTP error: 503: Transition > > al//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> > > > > ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved > > > > > > The requested URL could not be retrieved > > > > > > While trying to retrieve the URL: > > //api/ > A> > > > > The following error was encountered: > > > > Unable to determine IP address from host name for > > > > > > > > > The dnsserver returned: > > > > Name Error: The domain name does not exist. > > > > > > > This means that: > > > > The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL. > > Check if the address is correct. > > -- > > > Thanks! > > > -- > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > -- > > --tucker -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Are you using a full server path starting with http:// ? Are you behind a proxy server? Christian On Friday, June 10, 2011, ptrchen wrote: > Hi Tucker, > > Thanks for the reply. > > I ran "nslookup " from both (XP server) and > from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine. > > Both return > > Name: . > Address: > > > > On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker wrote: >> You appear to have a DNS problem: >> >> "Unable to determine IP address from host name for ." >> >> What does "nslookup " say? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen wrote: >> > Hi, >> >> > We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a >> > "requested URL could not be retrieved" error >> >> > We're running: >> >> > ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP >> > Python 2.5.x >> > Apache 2.2.x >> >> > Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10 >> >> > Here is the output after adding the --debug option: >> >> > -- >> > post-review --server=/ --username= -- >> > password= --revision-range=8325 --debug >> RBTools 0.3.2 >> Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data >> svn info >> diff --version >> repository info: Path: //, Base pa >> > th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False >> HTTP GETting api/ >> Got HTTP error: 503: > Transition >> > al//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> >> > >> > ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved >> > >> > >> > The requested URL could not be retrieved >> > >> > >> > While trying to retrieve the URL: >> > //api/> > A> >> > >> > The following error was encountered: >> > >> > Unable to determine IP address from host name for >> > >> > >> >> > >> > The dnsserver returned: >> > >> > Name Error: The domain name does not exist. >> > >> >> > >> > This means that: >> > >> > The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL. >> > Check if the address is correct. >> > -- >> >> > Thanks! >> >> > -- >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today >> > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> > For more options, visit this group >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en >> >> -- >> >> --tucker > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: 1.6 beta 2 - email EOF error
Hi Daryl,
The only thing I know has changed on our end is the addition of a Sender:
header. It shouldn't break anything, but perhaps they're strict and
disconnect you early. I don't know what has changed in Django, but maybe
something broke there.
To rule out Review Board as the cause, go into Admin UI -> Settings ->
E-mail and remove the "Sender e-mail address".
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Daryl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded to 1.6 beta 2 porting my database over. I was using
> 1.5 before, with email working ok. I left the email settings intact,
> using MS online services. The settings are -
>
> Mail server: Smtp.mail.microsoftonline.com
> Port: 587
> [checked] Use TLS for authentication
>
> I now get this error -
>
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] 2011-06-10 14:05:11,532 - ERROR -
> Error sending e-mail notification with subject 'Review Request: Test
> diff' on behalf of '*** sender removed ***' to '*** email addresses
> removed ***')
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] Traceback (most recent call last):
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
> packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/notifications/
> email.py", line 236, in send_review_mail
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] message.send()
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
> packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/message.py", line 251,
> in send
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return
> self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self])
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
> packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py", line
> 86, in send_messages
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sent = self._send(message)
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
> packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py", line
> 104, in _send
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error]
> email_message.message().as_string())
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
> smtplib.py", line 679, in sendmail
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] self.rset()
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
> smtplib.py", line 449, in rset
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.docmd("rset")
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
> smtplib.py", line 374, in docmd
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.getreply()
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
> smtplib.py", line 348, in getreply
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] line = self.file.readline()
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
> smtplib.py", line 160, in readline
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] chr = self.sslobj.read(1)
> [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sslerror: (8, 'EOF occurred in
> violation of protocol')
>
> Any thoughts? I tried this by posting a review from an old diff that
> was in the database from 1.5. And I also submitted a new diff report
> and got the same error.
>
> Thanks,
> Daryl
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Error in installing Review Board
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:29 PM, ROAAN wrote: > Jan, > > Yes I have been following the exact sequence of steps outlined there. > Actually, I have read it so many times that its memorized to me :-). > Anyhow, one thing which I think might be causing the issue is that I > am having "easy_install-2.6", "easy_install-2.5". Since the python > version I am using is 2.6.1 so I tried installing using > easy_install-2.6. The error trace that I posted above has the first > warning as > > "warning: GMP library not found; Not building > Crypto.PublicKey._fastmath", but I checked that is installed on my > system as well. I am not sure about if i need to set > up a path for it / some sort of link for my python environment to be > aware about it. Following exact instruction when You use so old operating system does not have chance to work. You must improvise. Enter error message at Google and try resolve the problem - then one more time run easy_install and so on, and so on. This was not be easy - but I installed ReviewBoard on so freaky Linux Distrubution I belive it is possible everywhere if You are ready to compile half of operating system from the source code - really. Worked for me. Good Luck :) Jan > Thanks, > Rohan. > > On Jun 10, 10:09 am, Jan Koprowski wrote: >> Rohan, >> >> Did You read and >> try:http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/admin/installation/linux/? >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:35 PM, ROAAN wrote: >> > Hi, >> >> > I am using Python 2.6 which i suppose should be fine and should not >> > conflict with the issues of using Python 2.4. >> >> > Rohan. >> >> > On Jun 9, 5:37 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: >> >> I should point out (we'll make an official announcement when the time >> >> comes, >> >> though it'll be a while) that RB 1.6 is likely going to be the last >> >> release >> >> to support Python 2.4. Django has a Python deprecation schedule that we'll >> >> be following. So ideally, people should make sure they can use newer >> >> versions of Python. >> >> >> Christian >> >> >> -- >> >> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com >> >> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org >> >> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Jan Koprowski >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Stephen, >> >> >> > If You can run Python 2.4 - this is not the case because of really >> >> > nice setup.py maintaining all necessary Python dependencies. >> >> > VirtualEnv solve almost all problems - only incompatible with mod_wsgi >> >> > Apache could be a problem. >> >> > Sometimes You must run something on very old machine and upgrading it >> >> > is not the case because sometimes you are not owner of machine :) >> >> >> > Regards, >> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:42 -0700, ROAAN wrote: >> >> > >> Hi, >> >> >> > >> I am installing ReviewBoard on my machine running Fedora 10. I seem >> >> > >> to >> >> >> > > It's worth noting that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life almost two >> >> > > years ago, so you're probably going to run into difficulty installing >> >> > > ANY new software on it. >> >> >> > > It would be prudent to upgrade to a supported operating system like >> >> > > Fedora 14 or 15, or move to a long-term supported release like Red Hat >> >> > > Enterprise Linux or CentOS. >> >> >> > > -- >> >> > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at >> >> >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >> >> > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> >> > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- >> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> >> > > For more options, visit this group at >> >> >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en >> >> >> > -- >> >> > ><> Jan Koprowski >> >> >> > -- >> >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at >> >> >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >> >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >> >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en >> >> > -- >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today >> > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> > For more options, visit this group >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ><> Jan Koprowski > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--
Re: Error in installing Review Board
Alternatively, if you have any sort of VM solution set up, or can set one up, you'll have a much easier time using Ubuntu Linux or a modern Fedora as your host. I haven't seen the GMP error, so I don't know off-hand what's needed there. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Jan Koprowski wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:29 PM, ROAAN wrote: > > Jan, > > > > Yes I have been following the exact sequence of steps outlined there. > > Actually, I have read it so many times that its memorized to me :-). > > Anyhow, one thing which I think might be causing the issue is that I > > am having "easy_install-2.6", "easy_install-2.5". Since the python > > version I am using is 2.6.1 so I tried installing using > > easy_install-2.6. The error trace that I posted above has the first > > warning as > > > > "warning: GMP library not found; Not building > > Crypto.PublicKey._fastmath", but I checked that is installed on my > > system as well. I am not sure about if i need to set > > up a path for it / some sort of link for my python environment to be > > aware about it. > > Following exact instruction when You use so old operating system does > not have chance to work. > You must improvise. Enter error message at Google and try resolve the > problem - then one more time run easy_install and so on, and so on. > This was not be easy - but I installed ReviewBoard on so freaky Linux > Distrubution I belive it is possible everywhere if You are ready to > compile half of operating system from the source code - really. Worked > for me. > > Good Luck :) > > Jan > > > Thanks, > > Rohan. > > > > On Jun 10, 10:09 am, Jan Koprowski wrote: > >> Rohan, > >> > >> Did You read and try: > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/admin/installation/linux/? > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:35 PM, ROAAN > wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > >> > I am using Python 2.6 which i suppose should be fine and should not > >> > conflict with the issues of using Python 2.4. > >> > >> > Rohan. > >> > >> > On Jun 9, 5:37 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > >> >> I should point out (we'll make an official announcement when the time > comes, > >> >> though it'll be a while) that RB 1.6 is likely going to be the last > release > >> >> to support Python 2.4. Django has a Python deprecation schedule that > we'll > >> >> be following. So ideally, people should make sure they can use newer > >> >> versions of Python. > >> > >> >> Christian > >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > >> >> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > >> >> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > >> > >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Jan Koprowski < > jan.koprow...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> > >> >> > Stephen, > >> > >> >> > If You can run Python 2.4 - this is not the case because of really > >> >> > nice setup.py maintaining all necessary Python dependencies. > >> >> > VirtualEnv solve almost all problems - only incompatible with > mod_wsgi > >> >> > Apache could be a problem. > >> >> > Sometimes You must run something on very old machine and upgrading > it > >> >> > is not the case because sometimes you are not owner of machine :) > >> > >> >> > Regards, > >> > >> >> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:42 -0700, ROAAN wrote: > >> >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> >> > >> I am installing ReviewBoard on my machine running Fedora 10. I > seem to > >> > >> >> > > It's worth noting that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life almost > two > >> >> > > years ago, so you're probably going to run into difficulty > installing > >> >> > > ANY new software on it. > >> > >> >> > > It would be prudent to upgrade to a supported operating system > like > >> >> > > Fedora 14 or 15, or move to a long-term supported release like > Red Hat > >> >> > > Enterprise Linux or CentOS. > >> > >> >> > > -- > >> >> > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > >> >> >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > >> >> > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > >> >> > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > >> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >> >> > > For more options, visit this group at > >> >> >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > >> > >> >> > -- > >> >> > ><> Jan Koprowski > >> > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > >> >> >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > >> >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > >> >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >> >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >> >http://groups.google.c
Re: Basic Workflow
Jeb, We faced the same and have come to a manual workaround. We organize around SCRs (Software Change Requests), with one review per SCR. This leads to a complication in that each review can have multiple revisions (since an SCR can have multiple changesets) and multiple files per revision. Here's an example of our workflow. The example assumes 1 submitter (the developer) and 2 reviewers since that's the way it is for us. Also it has 2 revisions because there were two changesets submitted by the author. Revision 1 has changes to fileA and fileB, and Revision 2 has changes to fileA and fileC. - Submitter creates a review - Reviewer1 goes to the diffs tab, selects Revision 1 - He reviews fileA and finds no faults. He adds a single comment "OK file" at the first visible line. This isn't necessarily the first line of the file since RB displays the first diff +- context lines. - He reviews fileB and puts a comment in one of the diffs. He does not put "OK file" in this case. - He changes to Revision2 and finds all files to be ok so he puts "OK file" against each file there. - Reviewer2 goes to Revision1 and reviews fileA. He finds no problems and also places an "OK File" in the first visible line. Now anyone can tell that file has been reviewed since it has a "2" when it is viewed in the diff file. - He reviews fileB and if he finds no additional comments, puts an "OK file" . - He reviews Revision2 and also finds everything ok there too. - Submitter responds to the comment in File A - Reviewer1 goes into FileA and assuming he agrees with the submitter, puts an "OK" against the comment. - Now, since there are no unanswered comments in FileA, Reviwer1 also puts an "OK file" in the first visible line in the file. In short, 2 "OK files" at the top of each file indicates the file review is complete. When all files in all revisions have a "2", the review can be closed. There are complications and nuisances using this method but with people willing to work around them it works ok. Clearly it would be much better to have UI and automated support from RB but it is what it is. John On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jeb wrote: > I've read the docs and looked out on the web and haven't really found > enough on this subject to satisfy me. Using RB seems pretty simple. > Someone creates a review request. I review it. We iterate over the > review, having these nice threaded discussions. Code is changed or > not, finally it is submitted and closed. The tough part for me is > knowing exactly when I've got work to do. > > 1. Bob creates a review > 2. I respond to it asking for clarification on a few things > 3. Bob responds > > How do I know Bob responded? > > Email - that's not enough for me, I don't rely on email to keep track > of workflow issues like that > New Comments Icon - what happens when I click the review and then mess > with it -- that icon is gone and now it looks like any other review > > I just wish I could have some custom status or something where I could > do the review, hit publish, then change it to "awaiting coder > feedback" or something and have it show up in the submitter's incoming > list. > > I'm sure I'm missing something, and I apologize for wasting anyone's > time with this, but I could really use some help. > > Jeb > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- John blog: http://arrizza.blogspot.com/ web: http://www.arrizza.com/ -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Basic Workflow
Neither the star or the bubble work for what you're looking for. In our case, even less so since we have multiple reviewers. They just aren't applicable as a way to track the review's state. What would be ideal is some sort of state variable per reviewer per revision per file.. RB would let each reviewer independently set a state variable allocated to him on a file, and then RB would magically "sum up" at the dashboard level so it is immediately visible if a review is ready to close or if there is work to do. At the dashboard level It could be a number n indicating the number of incompletes across all reviewers/revisions/files. When that number is 0, code review is ready to close. When a reviewer sets a flag in the revision/file saying he's done, it has a nice little icon on the screen next to that file, and the master number is decremented by 1. Each Revision square [1][2][3] etc could be colored to indicate all files in that revision have been accepted/reviewed by all reviewers. John On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Jeb Beich wrote: > Thanks - that does clear it up quite a bit. > > Yes, I might open a review request to see the new comments but, before > responding, have to do something else. At that point, I really need to > know that I need to get back to it. Maybe I could just use the star. > > Yes, the question I'm trying to answer is who's ballpark it's in. I > think our scenario is similar to what you've described. After the diff > is updated, I see the review in my incoming list. Then I make > comments, and the submitter sees that there's a comment bubble icon. > Then we might iterate over the initial set of comments, discussing > each issue. So the submitter responds (to my -- the review -- > comments), and then I see they've responded because the review shows > up in my list with the comment bubble icon. > > I guess my only point is that the comment bubble icon isn't enough. > Simply because if I open the review it goes away. I'd rather the > review appear in my incoming queue until I respond with comments and > publish. Conversely, if I'm the submitter and the reviewer comments on > my request, I want it to show up in my incoming queue. Then when I > respond and publish, it goes back into my outgoing queue (and into the > reviewer's incoming queue). > > I think the comment bubble icon will get the job done. I'll just make > sure to allocate enough time to finish dealing with a review request > any time I open it up. > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Christian Hammond > wrote: > > Hi Jeb, > > > > Jan had some good comments, and I'll add a bit to that. > > > > The New Comments icon does indeed go away when you open the review > request. > > The intent is that you'll read whatever changed when you next view that > > review request. I'm guessing in your workflow, you sometimes go into a > > review request to make updates but then want to see any comments since > you > > last read it? > > > > In the upcoming 1.6 release, we collapse all reviews that are older than > > when you last visited the review request, making it easier to see what on > > the page you really should be paying attention to. > > > > I think down the road, we can do better about actually tracking whether > > you've viewed a review, based on where you've scrolled. Not in 1.6, but > > perhaps after. > > > > It sounds like what you're wanting though is really a more clear "Who's > > ballpark is this in?" This sort of workflow is very specific to > individual > > setups, so I'd be hesitant to bake it into Review Board itself. However, > > that can be where extensions come in. In 2.0 (which we'll be working on > > after 1.6 is out the door), we'll support writing custom extensions that > can > > augment the dashboard and review requests, amongst other things, and it's > > conceivable that someone would write such an extension. > > > > What I'm curious about though is how you decide when it's the reviewers' > > turn and when it's the developer's turn. It seems that it's generally the > > reviewers' turn when a new diff is updated, and the developer's turn any > > time after there's any feedback. How would you change it in your setup? > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jeb wrote: > >> > >> I've read the docs and looked out on the web and haven't really found > >> enough on this subject to satisfy me. Using RB seems pretty simple. > >> Someone creates a review request. I review it. We iterate over the > >> review, having these nice threaded discussions. Code is changed or > >> not, finally it is submitted and closed. The tough part for me is > >> knowing exactly when I've got work to do. > >> > >> 1. Bob creates a review > >> 2. I respond to it asking for clarification on a few things > >> 3. Bob responds > >> > >> How do I know Bob responded? > >> > >> Email - th
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Yes, I am using the full server path name with http:// We do have a proxy server, but both the requester and target are within the proxy server. On Jun 10, 11:29 am, Christian Hammond wrote: > Are you using a full server path starting with http:// ? Are you > behind a proxy server? > > Christian > > > > On Friday, June 10, 2011, ptrchen wrote: > > Hi Tucker, > > > Thanks for the reply. > > > I ran "nslookup " from both (XP server) and > > from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine. > > > Both return > > > Name: . > > Address: > > > On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker wrote: > >> You appear to have a DNS problem: > > >> "Unable to determine IP address from host name for ." > > >> What does "nslookup " say? > > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen wrote: > >> > Hi, > > >> > We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a > >> > "requested URL could not be retrieved" error > > >> > We're running: > > >> > ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP > >> > Python 2.5.x > >> > Apache 2.2.x > > >> > Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10 > > >> > Here is the output after adding the --debug option: > > >> > -- > >> > post-review --server=/ --username= -- > >> > password= --revision-range=8325 --debug > >> RBTools 0.3.2 > >> Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data > >> svn info > >> diff --version > >> repository info: Path: //, Base pa > >> > th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False > >> HTTP GETting api/ > >> Got HTTP error: 503: >> Transition > >> > al//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> > >> > > >> > ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved > >> > > >> > > >> > The requested URL could not be retrieved > >> > > >> > > >> > While trying to retrieve the URL: > >> > //api/ >> > A> > >> > > >> > The following error was encountered: > >> > > >> > Unable to determine IP address from host name for > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > The dnsserver returned: > >> > > >> > Name Error: The domain name does not exist. > >> > > > >> > > >> > This means that: > >> > > >> > The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL. > >> > Check if the address is correct. > >> > -- > > >> > Thanks! > > >> > -- > >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > >> > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >> > For more options, visit this group > >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > >> -- > > >> --tucker > > > -- > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > -- > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name? On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen wrote: > Hi Tucker, > > Thanks for the reply. > > I ran "nslookup " from both (XP server) and > from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine. > > Both return > > Name: . > Address: > > > > On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker wrote: >> You appear to have a DNS problem: >> >> "Unable to determine IP address from host name for ." >> >> What does "nslookup " say? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen wrote: >> > Hi, >> >> > We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a >> > "requested URL could not be retrieved" error >> >> > We're running: >> >> > ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP >> > Python 2.5.x >> > Apache 2.2.x >> >> > Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10 >> >> > Here is the output after adding the --debug option: >> >> > -- >> > post-review --server=/ --username= -- >> > password= --revision-range=8325 --debug >> RBTools 0.3.2 >> Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data >> svn info >> diff --version >> repository info: Path: //, Base pa >> > th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False >> HTTP GETting api/ >> Got HTTP error: 503: > Transition >> > al//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> >> > >> > ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved >> > >> > >> > The requested URL could not be retrieved >> > >> > >> > While trying to retrieve the URL: >> > //api/> > A> >> > >> > The following error was encountered: >> > >> > Unable to determine IP address from host name for >> > >> > >> >> > >> > The dnsserver returned: >> > >> > Name Error: The domain name does not exist. >> > >> >> > >> > This means that: >> > >> > The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL. >> > Check if the address is correct. >> > -- >> >> > Thanks! >> >> > -- >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today >> > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> > For more options, visit this group >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en >> >> -- >> >> --tucker > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- --tucker -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me from doing that. Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker wrote: > Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully > qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out > guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name? > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen wrote: > > Hi Tucker, > > > Thanks for the reply. > > > I ran "nslookup " from both (XP server) and > > from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine. > > > Both return > > > Name: . > > Address: > > > On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker wrote: > >> You appear to have a DNS problem: > > >> "Unable to determine IP address from host name for ." > > >> What does "nslookup " say? > > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen wrote: > >> > Hi, > > >> > We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a > >> > "requested URL could not be retrieved" error > > >> > We're running: > > >> > ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP > >> > Python 2.5.x > >> > Apache 2.2.x > > >> > Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10 > > >> > Here is the output after adding the --debug option: > > >> > -- > >> > post-review --server=/ --username= -- > >> > password= --revision-range=8325 --debug > >> RBTools 0.3.2 > >> Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data > >> svn info > >> diff --version > >> repository info: Path: //, Base pa > >> > th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False > >> HTTP GETting api/ > >> Got HTTP error: 503: >> Transition > >> > al//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> > >> > > >> > ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved > >> > > >> > > >> > The requested URL could not be retrieved > >> > > >> > > >> > While trying to retrieve the URL: > >> > //api/ >> > A> > >> > > >> > The following error was encountered: > >> > > >> > Unable to determine IP address from host name for > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > The dnsserver returned: > >> > > >> > Name Error: The domain name does not exist. > >> > > > >> > > >> > This means that: > >> > > >> > The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL. > >> > Check if the address is correct. > >> > -- > > >> > Thanks! > > >> > -- > >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > >> > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >> > For more options, visit this group > >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > >> -- > > >> --tucker > > > -- > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today > > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > -- > > --tucker -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers. Regardless of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review. The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server, meaning that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux, then you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set. This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration. If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other solutions. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM, ptrchen wrote: > Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me > from doing that. > > Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN > > Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option > > On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker wrote: > > Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully > > qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out > > guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name? > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen wrote: > > > Hi Tucker, > > > > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > > I ran "nslookup " from both (XP server) and > > > from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine. > > > > > Both return > > > > > Name: . > > > Address: > > > > > On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker wrote: > > >> You appear to have a DNS problem: > > > > >> "Unable to determine IP address from host name for ." > > > > >> What does "nslookup " say? > > > > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen wrote: > > >> > Hi, > > > > >> > We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a > > >> > "requested URL could not be retrieved" error > > > > >> > We're running: > > > > >> > ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP > > >> > Python 2.5.x > > >> > Apache 2.2.x > > > > >> > Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10 > > > > >> > Here is the output after adding the --debug option: > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > post-review --server=/ --username= -- > > >> > password= --revision-range=8325 --debug > > >> RBTools 0.3.2 > > >> Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data > > >> svn info > > >> diff --version > > >> repository info: Path: //, Base > pa > > >> > th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False > > >> HTTP GETting api/ > > >> Got HTTP error: 503: Transition > > >> > al//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> > > >> > > > >> > ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > The requested URL could not be retrieved > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > While trying to retrieve the URL: > > >> > HREF="//api/">//api/ > >> > A> > > >> > > > >> > The following error was encountered: > > >> > > > >> > Unable to determine IP address from host name for > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > The dnsserver returned: > > >> > > > >> > Name Error: The domain name does not exist. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > This means that: > > >> > > > >> > The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL. > > >> > Check if the address is correct. > > >> > > -- > > > > >> > Thanks! > > > > >> > -- > > >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// > www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > >> > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > > > >> -- > > > > >> --tucker > > > > > -- > > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// > www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > > > -- > > > > --tucker > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http:/
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt window do the trick? On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers. Regardless > of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet > settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review. > > The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server, meaning > that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the > domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all > respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux, then > you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set. > > This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in > post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration. > > If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other > solutions. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM, ptrchen wrote: > > Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me > > from doing that. > > > Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN > > > Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option > > > On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker wrote: > > > Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully > > > qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out > > > guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name? > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen wrote: > > > > Hi Tucker, > > > > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > > I ran "nslookup " from both (XP server) and > > > > from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine. > > > > > Both return > > > > > Name: . > > > > Address: > > > > > On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker wrote: > > > >> You appear to have a DNS problem: > > > > >> "Unable to determine IP address from host name for ." > > > > >> What does "nslookup " say? > > > > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen wrote: > > > >> > Hi, > > > > >> > We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a > > > >> > "requested URL could not be retrieved" error > > > > >> > We're running: > > > > >> > ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP > > > >> > Python 2.5.x > > > >> > Apache 2.2.x > > > > >> > Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10 > > > > >> > Here is the output after adding the --debug option: > > > -- > > > >> > post-review --server=/ --username= -- > > > >> > password= --revision-range=8325 --debug > > > >> RBTools 0.3.2 > > > >> Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data > > > >> svn info > > > >> diff --version > > > >> repository info: Path: //, Base > > pa > > > >> > th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False > > > >> HTTP GETting api/ > > > >> Got HTTP error: 503: > Transition > > > >> > al//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> > > > >> > > > > >> > ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > The requested URL could not be retrieved > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > While trying to retrieve the URL: > > > >> > > HREF="//api/">//api/ > > >> > A> > > > >> > > > > >> > The following error was encountered: > > > >> > > > > >> > Unable to determine IP address from host name for > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > The dnsserver returned: > > > >> > > > > >> > Name Error: The domain name does not exist. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > This means that: > > > >> > > > > >> > The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL. > > > >> > Check if the address is correct. > > > -- > > > > >> > Thanks! > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// > >www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > > >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > > >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > >> > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > > > >> -- > > > > >> --tucker > > > > > -- > > > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// > >www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > > > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
I know at least on Linux, the http_proxy variable is respected. I don't know about on Windows. A common problem on Linux is that people will have that set, in order for other things to work correctly, and then post-review will pick it up. Some people use an alias or wrapper so that doesn't happen. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:51 PM, ptrchen wrote: > Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt > window do the trick? > > On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers. > Regardless > > of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet > > settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review. > > > > The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server, > meaning > > that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the > > domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all > > respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux, > then > > you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set. > > > > This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in > > post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration. > > > > If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other > > solutions. > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM, ptrchen wrote: > > > Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me > > > from doing that. > > > > > Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN > > > > > Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option > > > > > On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker wrote: > > > > Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully > > > > qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing > out > > > > guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name? > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen wrote: > > > > > Hi Tucker, > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > > > > I ran "nslookup " from both (XP server) > and > > > > > from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine. > > > > > > > Both return > > > > > > > Name: . > > > > > Address: > > > > > > > On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker wrote: > > > > >> You appear to have a DNS problem: > > > > > > >> "Unable to determine IP address from host name for ." > > > > > > >> What does "nslookup " say? > > > > > > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen > wrote: > > > > >> > Hi, > > > > > > >> > We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into > a > > > > >> > "requested URL could not be retrieved" error > > > > > > >> > We're running: > > > > > > >> > ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP > > > > >> > Python 2.5.x > > > > >> > Apache 2.2.x > > > > > > >> > Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10 > > > > > > >> > Here is the output after adding the --debug option: > > > > > > -- > > > > >> > post-review --server=/ --username= -- > > > > >> > password= --revision-range=8325 --debug > > > > >> RBTools 0.3.2 > > > > >> Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data > > > > >> svn info > > > > >> diff --version > > > > >> repository info: Path: //, > Base > > > pa > > > > >> > th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False > > > > >> HTTP GETting api/ > > > > >> Got HTTP error: 503: 4.01 > > > Transition > > > > >> > al//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The requested URL could not be retrieved > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > While trying to retrieve the URL: > > > > >> > > > HREF="//api/">//api/ > > > >> > A> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The following error was encountered: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Unable to determine IP address from host name for > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The dnsserver returned: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Name Error: The domain name does not exist. > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > This means that: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the > URL. > > > > >> > Check if the address is correct. > > > > > > -- > > > > > > >> > Thanks! > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > Want to he
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Sorry Chrisitan, never mind, I misread your post. I'll do some more digging for overriding the proxy configuration On Jun 10, 4:51 pm, ptrchen wrote: > Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt > window do the trick? > > On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers. Regardless > > of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet > > settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review. > > > The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server, meaning > > that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the > > domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all > > respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux, then > > you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set. > > > This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in > > post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration. > > > If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other > > solutions. > > > Christian > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM, ptrchen wrote: > > > Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me > > > from doing that. > > > > Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN > > > > Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option > > > > On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker wrote: > > > > Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully > > > > qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out > > > > guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name? > > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen wrote: > > > > > Hi Tucker, > > > > > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > > > I ran "nslookup " from both (XP server) and > > > > > from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine. > > > > > > Both return > > > > > > Name: . > > > > > Address: > > > > > > On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker wrote: > > > > >> You appear to have a DNS problem: > > > > > >> "Unable to determine IP address from host name for ." > > > > > >> What does "nslookup " say? > > > > > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen wrote: > > > > >> > Hi, > > > > > >> > We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a > > > > >> > "requested URL could not be retrieved" error > > > > > >> > We're running: > > > > > >> > ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP > > > > >> > Python 2.5.x > > > > >> > Apache 2.2.x > > > > > >> > Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10 > > > > > >> > Here is the output after adding the --debug option: > > > > -- > > > > >> > post-review --server=/ --username= -- > > > > >> > password= --revision-range=8325 --debug > > > > >> RBTools 0.3.2 > > > > >> Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data > > > > >> svn info > > > > >> diff --version > > > > >> repository info: Path: //, > > > > >> Base > > > pa > > > > >> > th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False > > > > >> HTTP GETting api/ > > > > >> Got HTTP error: 503: > > > >> 4.01 > > > Transition > > > > >> > al//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > ERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The requested URL could not be retrieved > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > While trying to retrieve the URL: > > > > >> > > > HREF="//api/">//api/ > > > >> > A> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The following error was encountered: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Unable to determine IP address from host name for > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The dnsserver returned: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Name Error: The domain name does not exist. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > This means that: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the > > > > >> > URL. > > > > >> > Check if the address is correct. > > > > -- > > > > > >> > Thanks! > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// > > >www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > > > >> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > > > >> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > > >> > For more options, visit
Re: 1.6 beta 2 - email EOF error
This is interesting. First, when I tried removing the "Sender e-mail
address", after clicking Save the default noreply came back. And I
got the same error both with noreply and when using the codereviews@
internal email I created (that was working before). I also tried
modifying the code in email.py to set sender to None regardless. Same
result.
But then I found out we have an internal mail server. And it works
when pointing at that. It works both with the default noreply sender
and the codereviews@ email. So there's something unique to the MS
online mail.
Now if I could just get my sqlite3 database to convert to mysql. :)
But that will be another (long) post.
Thanks for the response,
Daryl
On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Daryl,
>
> The only thing I know has changed on our end is the addition of a Sender:
> header. It shouldn't break anything, but perhaps they're strict and
> disconnect you early. I don't know what has changed in Django, but maybe
> something broke there.
>
> To rule out Review Board as the cause, go into Admin UI -> Settings ->
> E-mail and remove the "Sender e-mail address".
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Daryl wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I just upgraded to 1.6 beta 2 porting my database over. I was using
> > 1.5 before, with email working ok. I left the email settings intact,
> > using MS online services. The settings are -
>
> > Mail server: Smtp.mail.microsoftonline.com
> > Port: 587
> > [checked] Use TLS for authentication
>
> > I now get this error -
>
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] 2011-06-10 14:05:11,532 - ERROR -
> > Error sending e-mail notification with subject 'Review Request: Test
> > diff' on behalf of '*** sender removed ***' to '*** email addresses
> > removed ***')
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] Traceback (most recent call last):
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
> > packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/notifications/
> > email.py", line 236, in send_review_mail
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] message.send()
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
> > packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/message.py", line 251,
> > in send
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return
> > self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self])
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
> > packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py", line
> > 86, in send_messages
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sent = self._send(message)
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
> > packages/Django-1.3-py2.4.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py", line
> > 104, in _send
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error]
> > email_message.message().as_string())
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
> > smtplib.py", line 679, in sendmail
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] self.rset()
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
> > smtplib.py", line 449, in rset
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.docmd("rset")
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
> > smtplib.py", line 374, in docmd
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] return self.getreply()
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
> > smtplib.py", line 348, in getreply
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] line = self.file.readline()
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/
> > smtplib.py", line 160, in readline
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] chr = self.sslobj.read(1)
> > [Fri Jun 10 14:05:11 2011] [error] sslerror: (8, 'EOF occurred in
> > violation of protocol')
>
> > Any thoughts? I tried this by posting a review from an old diff that
> > was in the database from 1.5. And I also submitted a new diff report
> > and got the same error.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Daryl
>
> > --
> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
