Allow anonymous read only access checkbox does nothing

2013-10-17 Thread jeffdomogala
Even with this checkbox checked, the state of Public Read-only access is always disabled. If I look at the site configuration in the admin database :Change site Configuration page, settings has u'auth_require_sitewide_login': False in it. I poked around in the code and auth_anonymous_access

Publish changes without e-mail notification

2013-10-17 Thread Kim Gräsman
Hi there, I'm an avid Review Board user, and I have a small question: Is there a way to selectively disable e-mail notification for changes to a review? Sometimes I make small editorial changes to review data, and I don't feel I need to spam a review group (sometimes 20-30 people) with the

Problem installing ReviewBoard via easy_install on Ubuntu:

2013-10-17 Thread Alexander Mayr
Hello, I have the following problem installing reviewboard via easy_install3 (installed via apt-get install python3-setuptools). is there a problem with my setup tools or is there really an invalid syntax inside the settings.py? the piece of code in the underneath mentioned file is: # Load

Re: Problem installing ReviewBoard via easy_install on Ubuntu:

2013-10-17 Thread David Trowbridge
Review Board does not support Python 3. You'll need to use Python 2.x -David On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Alexander Mayr alexander.may...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have the following problem installing reviewboard via easy_install3 (installed via apt-get install python3-setuptools). is

Re: Publish changes without e-mail notification

2013-10-17 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Kim, This feature doesn't exist, though it does come up from time to time. If done right, I'd be okay taking a patch for it, but our plate's pretty full right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to ship. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Re: Allow anonymous read only access checkbox does nothing

2013-10-17 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Jeff, I've just tried this on our installation, and it's working fine here. 1.7.9 is a bit older now, though I'm not aware of this feature having been broken at any point. Can you tell me the repro case? If you're logged out, you're unable to access /r/ ? Christian -- Christian Hammond -

Re: Publish changes without e-mail notification

2013-10-17 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2013-10-17 15:31, Christian Hammond wrote: [...] our plate's pretty full right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to ship. Wait... what happened to 1.8? :-) If you're really planning a major version bump (i.e. that wasn't a typo), is there a page somewhere with at least a brief overview of

What's coming for 2.0 (Was: Re: Publish changes without e-mail notification)

2013-10-17 Thread Christian Hammond
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com wrote: On 2013-10-17 15:31, Christian Hammond wrote: [...] our plate's pretty full right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to ship. Wait... what happened to 1.8? :-) If you're really planning a major version bump

Re: Publish changes without e-mail notification

2013-10-17 Thread Kim Gräsman
Hi Christian, On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: This feature doesn't exist, though it does come up from time to time. If done right, I'd be okay taking a patch for it, but our plate's pretty full right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to ship. Good

Issue 3111 in reviewboard: Search works only for word-characters. Does not for code or special characters

2013-10-17 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3111 by rafal.wo...@gmail.com: Search works only for word-characters. Does not for code or special characters http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3111 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must

Issue 3112 in reviewboard: Offer to display changes for review in unified format instead of side by side

2013-10-17 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3112 by emun...@mgebm.net: Offer to display changes for review in unified format instead of side by side http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3112 *** For customer support, please post to

Issue 3113 in reviewboard: `rbt post'prompts for username even if --username

2013-10-17 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3113 by yaneg...@gmail.com: `rbt post'prompts for username even if --username http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3113 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its entirety, or

Re: Issue 3113 in reviewboard: `rbt post'prompts for username even if --username

2013-10-17 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3113 by yaneg...@gmail.com: `rbt post'prompts for username even if --username http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3113 Please nuke this bug. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this

Issue 3114 in reviewboard: `rbt post' prompts for username even if --username if provided; `post-review --username` doesn't

2013-10-17 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3114 by yaneg...@gmail.com: `rbt post' prompts for username even if --username if provided; `post-review --username` doesn't http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3114 What version are you running? $

Re: Issue 3114 in reviewboard: `rbt post' prompts for username even if --username if provided; `post-review --username` doesn't

2013-10-17 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3114 by yaneg...@gmail.com: `rbt post' prompts for username even if --username if provided; `post-review --username` doesn't http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3114 Found the problem and it's easy to fix (will submit a review for this soon): 213

Issue 3115 in reviewboard: git diff must implicitly use --full-index when generating diffs

2013-10-17 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3115 by yaneg...@gmail.com: git diff must implicitly use --full-index when generating diffs http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3115 What version are you running? Reviewboard: 1.7.14 (local

Re: Issue 3115 in reviewboard: git diff must implicitly use --full-index when generating diffs

2013-10-17 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3115 by yaneg...@gmail.com: git diff must implicitly use --full-index when generating diffs http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3115 This appears to be a known issue: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.general/64319 The code in RBTools

Issue 3116 in reviewboard: Interrupting post-review/rbt post throws a KeyboardInterrupt exception

2013-10-17 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3116 by yaneg...@gmail.com: Interrupting post-review/rbt post throws a KeyboardInterrupt exception http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3116 What version are you running? 0.5.2-dev What steps will

Re: Issue 3115 in reviewboard: git diff must implicitly use --full-index when generating diffs

2013-10-17 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #2 on issue 3115 by chip...@gmail.com: git diff must implicitly use --full-index when generating diffs http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3115 I'm not sure about the 1.7.x case, but the new review request paths have largely

Re: Issue 3112 in reviewboard: Offer to display changes for review in unified format instead of side by side

2013-10-17 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #1 on issue 3112 by chip...@gmail.com: Offer to display changes for review in unified format instead of side by side http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3112 This is something we're unlikely to do. It's just not a use case that we're