Re: Can different teams share one review board server?
This is certainly an option. There's been enough demand for custom policy support such as who can see what, so think we'll be looking into this for 1.5. For now, the multiple servers approach should work fine. We're doing this at VMware currently. Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you could configure multiple review boards under different locations which is to be configured in apache. The only thing they would share is the apache and the mysql server. On Dec 4, 2:36 am, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay. I just wondering better to have the functionality to avoid security issue. These teams can not access each others' code repository. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Summary lost
After we hit the publish button. We tried it on IE, FireFox, Chrome - same result. Cong. From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Hammond Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 1:36 PM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com Cc: Matthew Chang Subject: Re: Unable to Login with Admin password The summary of the review request? At what stage is this lost, immediately after entering, on reloading, or when publishing the review request? What browser are you using? Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Cong Do [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, We just got reviewboard up and running. However, for some reasons, the summary is not being inserted into the database. Anyone has run into this issue? Cong. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Summary lost
When you type in the summary, do you leave the field open or do you hit Enter to save it, or do you just hit Publish? There's a long-standing bug where sometimes the fields don't get saved if you don't explicitly hit Enter to save them. This is being fixed as part of a large change I have up for review. Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Cong Do [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After we hit the publish button. We tried it on IE, FireFox, Chrome – same result. Cong. -- *From:* reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Christian Hammond *Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2008 1:36 PM *To:* reviewboard@googlegroups.com *Cc:* Matthew Chang *Subject:* Re: Unable to Login with Admin password The summary of the review request? At what stage is this lost, immediately after entering, on reloading, or when publishing the review request? What browser are you using? Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Cong Do [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, We just got reviewboard up and running. However, for some reasons, the summary is not being inserted into the database. Anyone has run into this issue? Cong. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Upgrade issues
I've just moved to rev 1623 in trunk (I was at 1519). I do like the new manual upgrade required screen that pops up (settings.py has been updated to change the location for htdocs/media/uploaded/images). Very slick and should saves lots of admin hair pulling :-) However when I first loaded the main page (and review page) it appeared to be messed up in Google Chrome and IE6 (to the point that diffs are not usable). This turned out to be because the whole of the htdocs directory had moved (changes to settings.py), not just the upload dir. REM this is new with heads revs as of 5th dec 2008 REM rev 1623 mkdir C:\svn\django\htdocs\media\uploaded\images mkdir C:\svn\django\htdocs\media\rb\images xcopy /S /Y C:\svn\django\reviewboard\htdocs C:\svn\django\htdocs I'm assuming I can still run from SVN without the deployment tool pre RB 1.0 - is this a bad assumption? Before the change RB was using (on this Windows box) C:\svn\django\reviewboard\htdocs. The good thing is that the manual upgrade required web page helped me work out what was going in. I also had some problems with the evolve, it worked but accessing (old) reviews (against svn) I get errors about bad change description/numbers :-(. Oddly the old reviews with my work in progress SCMTool are fine. I'm planning on starting a fresh db but I have copies (sqlitedb) if there is interest in debugging this. It isn't bothering me but I thought I would mention it (rather than logging a bug/issue). The pull from trunk also updated dbjlets, etc. I don't need fixes but wanted to share this in case other people hit this too (and in case I'm deploying incorrectly). Thanks! Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Upgrade issues
Hey Chris. This was due to a bug I'm currently fixing. I should have it in in about 15 mins. We've moved to using rb-site for site installations recently, and a recent change to settings.py has it look for htdocs in the parent directory of wherever settings_local.py is stored. This is due to the rb-site install directory structure (sitedir/conf/settings_local.py, sitedir/htdocs/, ...). I'm making it smarter so it will only do that if settings_local.py and settings.py aren't in the same directory. I would really recommend at this point using rb-site to do any site installs, even if you're using svn. You can run python setup.py install from your SVN checkout to get things installed so you can use rb-site. This will maintain your tree, get everything put into the right locations, and keep media files up-to-date. The GettingStarted guide has more info for migrating to this. Christian -- Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] VMware, Inc. On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Chris Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just moved to rev 1623 in trunk (I was at 1519). I do like the new manual upgrade required screen that pops up (settings.py has been updated to change the location for htdocs/media/uploaded/images). Very slick and should saves lots of admin hair pulling :-) However when I first loaded the main page (and review page) it appeared to be messed up in Google Chrome and IE6 (to the point that diffs are not usable). This turned out to be because the whole of the htdocs directory had moved (changes to settings.py), not just the upload dir. REM this is new with heads revs as of 5th dec 2008 REM rev 1623 mkdir C:\svn\django\htdocs\media\uploaded\images mkdir C:\svn\django\htdocs\media\rb\images xcopy /S /Y C:\svn\django\reviewboard\htdocs C:\svn\django\htdocs I'm assuming I can still run from SVN without the deployment tool pre RB 1.0 - is this a bad assumption? Before the change RB was using (on this Windows box) C:\svn\django\reviewboard\htdocs. The good thing is that the manual upgrade required web page helped me work out what was going in. I also had some problems with the evolve, it worked but accessing (old) reviews (against svn) I get errors about bad change description/numbers :-(. Oddly the old reviews with my work in progress SCMTool are fine. I'm planning on starting a fresh db but I have copies (sqlitedb) if there is interest in debugging this. It isn't bothering me but I thought I would mention it (rather than logging a bug/issue). The pull from trunk also updated dbjlets, etc. I don't need fixes but wanted to share this in case other people hit this too (and in case I'm deploying incorrectly). Thanks! Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 752 in reviewboard: Multiple e-mails containing different dif sets sent when publishing an update to a review
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: Component-EMail Comment #1 on issue 752 by chipx86: Multiple e-mails containing different dif sets sent when publishing an update to a review http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=752 So.. you actually get two e-mails? I don't know how this could happen. What revision/nightly are you using? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 753 in reviewboard: ReviewBoard packages don't include errordocs directory
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 753 by russell.bryant: ReviewBoard packages don't include errordocs directory http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=753 As of review http://reviews.review-board.org/r/645/ , rb-site has been updated to install the errordocs directory into a site directory by linking to it in the package. However, it does not appear that the packaging has been updated to include it. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
