Hello everybody,
while attempting to add some basic support for a proprietary SCM to
Review Board / post-review I stumbled over one issue that I'm
currently uncertain how to solve: The SCM I'm integrating uses change
identifiers, which are not numeric. Instead arbitrary strings are
used, which
Christian,
I moved the discussion of how i wanted to use review board to a new
topic, seems more appropriate.
As for the windows install after a load of effort (and some swearing
at the computer) i've got it all working, having SVN on https didn't
help but i've sorted that out as well.
The
This discussion was moved from another one that was about windows
installs.
I was hoping to use review board as such:
The main development trunk is stable.
We want to add something new, so a developer takes a branch to work in
leaving trunk alone.
Once the developer is happy with their work
Chris wrote:
Also unless code has been given the OK i dont want it to get into
trunk, is this possible? i.e. can we stop people committing to trunk,
or is that more something we need to deal with at a people level not
an automation level
I don't think this is done out of the box. At least not
Hi Chris,
Review Board doesn't have any way of preventing code from being checked in.
As H M said, you'll need a pre-commit hook for this. I think there's one on
http://reviews.review-boardorg/ somewhere. At some point we may bundle and
document one, but not until we have a solid concept of
We definitely want to improve the install process. Since Review Board
depends on a bunch of other components, each with their own quirks and
platform biases, it's not easy to get a dead simple install going. In time,
a native Windows installer will be provided for this, but probably not for a
The general use case is installing in a new virtual host. We may be able to
get rb-site to generate different kinds of configurations someday, but
usually anything custom should be handled by the administrators. We're only
providing sample configurations.
Still, if you wouldn't mind filing a bug
On May 11, 9:55 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
With this SCM, is the change identifier a server-stored ID that contains the
description and other information for Review Board to parse? Or is it more
like an atomic ID representing that change that gets pushed to the server
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
thilo.gin...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 11, 9:55 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
With this SCM, is the change identifier a server-stored ID that contains
the
description and other information for Review Board to parse?
Comment #2 on issue 1107 by ivazqueznet: Changes in review requests
sometimes show up as occuring 7 hours earlier than the actually do
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1107
If you look at the descriptions, you'll see that the description in the
second change
doesn't
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1117 by cmburboa: Error 500 Please help
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1117
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What version are you running?
What's the URL of the page
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 1117 by chipx86: Error 500 Please help
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1117
In sitedir/conf/settings_local.py, add:
DEBUG = True
You should then get a backtrace instead of that error page, which we can
use to
Comment #3 on issue 1107 by chipx86: Changes in review requests sometimes
show up as occuring 7 hours earlier than the actually do
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1107
Oh, okay. So would I be correct in assuming that you posted the review
request, then
changed the
Comment #2 on issue 1116 by delight.tm: Error after 'bugs fixed' field edit
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1116
Nothing. It is ok for me to get just comma-separated bug ids.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Comment #2 on issue 1117 by cmburboa: Error 500 Please help
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1117
I tried that one time before but after the change of falase to true,
anything else
works, I had to run the rb-site script again
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #5 on issue 1107 by chipx86: Changes in review requests sometimes
show up as occuring 7 hours earlier than the actually do
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1107
I don't know, it seems like it's working fine. I really just think you
don't have the
correct
Comment #3 on issue 1117 by chipx86: Error 500 Please help
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1117
it could be that you typoed something. It must be exactly as I listed, no
spaces
before it, on its own line. Capital T on True.
Without this information, there's nothing I
17 matches
Mail list logo
