I'll check with our CM people on monday, we'll see if they have any problem
with this.
2009/6/13 David Trowbridge
>
> I don't see any reason why we shouldn't do this. Accountability is a good
> thing.
>
> -David
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
> >
> > Hmm... I don't know a
I don't see any reason why we shouldn't do this. Accountability is a good thing.
-David
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
>
> Hmm... I don't know about that. I mean, if you really wanted to try and stick
> unique identifiers in your p4 commands so you could track which ones wer
Oh, I completely misunderstood this.
I'm fine with adding it. We just need to be sure that it doesn't break
existing setups.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Pa
Hmm... I don't know about that. I mean, if you really wanted to try and stick
unique identifiers in your p4 commands so you could track which ones were
currently pending, I guess you could, but I assume your Perforce administrators
would get cranky at you. ;) Also, I don't really know how feasi
Hi everyone,
I've just put out a release of 1.0 RC3, which should actually be the final
RC as long as nothing else blows up. I plan to release 1.0 next weekend.
If people would test this release this week and make sure nothing is newly
broken in your installs, it would REALLY help us out!
Detail
So this would allow for reporting progress on, say, file fetches from
Perforce? Something like that would be interesting for displaying progresses
on rendering diffs, but would be a lot of work. We'd need to find a good use
case for it and implement things in a way where our code could take
advanta
Sometimes a distro will have Apache configured with one version of Python
(say, 2.4) while /usr/bin/python is 2.5. I've seen this on a RHEL5 machine,
though it's possible that's because someone installed a newer Python.
What's the site-packages path containing the new MySQLdb?
Also, do you see th
Hi Lynn,
To my knowledge, nobody has. Someone would have to work on this and submit a
patch (which isn't a huge amount of work, so long as there's a command-line
tool or Python API for communicating with SourceGear).
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www
Can you submit this to http://reviews.review-board.org/? All patches should
go through there for review.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Bartlomiej Celary <
bar
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:57 PM, joseph.pnc wrote:
> And this line:
> "^(/.*)$" => "/reviewboard.fcgi/$1",
> to this:
> "^(/.*)$" => "/reviewboard.fcgi/$1",
Hmm, I don't see a difference between these two lines. Am I missing it?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@c
On Fri June 12 2009 19:11:15 Christopher wrote:
> hg requestreview -m "Made some great new changes to component Foo"
>
For Mercurial, you can evaluate this HG extension:
http://freehg.org/u/roccoblues/mercurial-reviewboard/
Regards.
Gilles.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
11 matches
Mail list logo