Re: Report application name to Perforce using -zprog?

[Jeff Andros]

I'll check with our CM people on monday, we'll see if they have any problem
with this.

2009/6/13 David Trowbridge 

>
> I don't see any reason why we shouldn't do this. Accountability is a good
> thing.
>
> -David
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
> >
> > Hmm... I don't know about that. I mean, if you really wanted to try and
> stick unique identifiers in your p4 commands so you could track which ones
> were currently pending, I guess you could, but I assume your Perforce
> administrators would get cranky at you. ;) Also, I don't really know how
> feasible that would be for showing progress... I mean, all you get from
> monitor is what processes are still alive, and how long they've been
> running. Maybe I misunderstood where you were going with that.
> >
> > The main purpose of throwing in a -zprog is just to make things a little
> prettier on the Perforce side. It lets you identify your application to the
> server, so logs and monitor output will display that instead of a generic
> "p4" (for post-review) or whatever the p4 python api reports (for Review
> Board). Mostly this is just a way of playing nice in the general Perforce
> environment. Though this might also allow RB admins who also have access to
> Perforce server logs to get a better sense of how they are affecting or
> being affected by Perforce performance. (There may be other ways of
> identifying Review Board in logs depending on your configuration--user, RB
> server IP--though probably not for post-review).
> >
> > This wouldn't be a huge change (just tack that on to p4 commands, and set
> something in the p4python connection object) and I would think the only
> major reason not to do it is if people didn't really want Review Board
> reported as reviewboard or similar in their Perforce logs.
> >
> > -- Paul
> >
> > 
> > From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Christian Hammond [chip...@chipx86.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 4:32 PM
> > To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: Re: Report application name to Perforce using -zprog?
> >
> > So this would allow for reporting progress on, say, file fetches from
> Perforce? Something like that would be interesting for displaying progresses
> on rendering diffs, but would be a lot of work. We'd need to find a good use
> case for it and implement things in a way where our code could take
> advantage of this information without requiring (for all the other SCMs).
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
> > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Paul Scott  psc...@vmware.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Review Boarders,
> >
> > My team uses the -zprog global option with a few major internal
> scripts/applications to help better track usage patterns. (If you're
> unfamiliar with -zprog, you can read about it here:
> http://kb.perforce.com/AdminTasks/SuperuserTasks/UsingTheZpro..erProcesses).
> I was thinking about adding this to our Review Board and post-review.
> How/where I implement this will be a little bit different based on whether
> this is a customization or something I intend to submit as a patch, so I
> wanted to see if this is something folks would like Review Board to do, or
> not like Review Board to do, or what.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paul Scott
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>


-- 
Jeff
O|||O

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Report application name to Perforce using -zprog?

[David Trowbridge]

I don't see any reason why we shouldn't do this. Accountability is a good thing.

-David

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
>
> Hmm... I don't know about that. I mean, if you really wanted to try and stick 
> unique identifiers in your p4 commands so you could track which ones were 
> currently pending, I guess you could, but I assume your Perforce 
> administrators would get cranky at you. ;) Also, I don't really know how 
> feasible that would be for showing progress... I mean, all you get from 
> monitor is what processes are still alive, and how long they've been running. 
> Maybe I misunderstood where you were going with that.
>
> The main purpose of throwing in a -zprog is just to make things a little 
> prettier on the Perforce side. It lets you identify your application to the 
> server, so logs and monitor output will display that instead of a generic 
> "p4" (for post-review) or whatever the p4 python api reports (for Review 
> Board). Mostly this is just a way of playing nice in the general Perforce 
> environment. Though this might also allow RB admins who also have access to 
> Perforce server logs to get a better sense of how they are affecting or being 
> affected by Perforce performance. (There may be other ways of identifying 
> Review Board in logs depending on your configuration--user, RB server 
> IP--though probably not for post-review).
>
> This wouldn't be a huge change (just tack that on to p4 commands, and set 
> something in the p4python connection object) and I would think the only major 
> reason not to do it is if people didn't really want Review Board reported as 
> reviewboard or similar in their Perforce logs.
>
> -- Paul
>
> 
> From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
> Of Christian Hammond [chip...@chipx86.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 4:32 PM
> To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Report application name to Perforce using -zprog?
>
> So this would allow for reporting progress on, say, file fetches from 
> Perforce? Something like that would be interesting for displaying progresses 
> on rendering diffs, but would be a lot of work. We'd need to find a good use 
> case for it and implement things in a way where our code could take advantage 
> of this information without requiring (for all the other SCMs).
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Paul Scott 
> mailto:psc...@vmware.com>> wrote:
>
> Hey Review Boarders,
>
> My team uses the -zprog global option with a few major internal 
> scripts/applications to help better track usage patterns. (If you're 
> unfamiliar with -zprog, you can read about it here: 
> http://kb.perforce.com/AdminTasks/SuperuserTasks/UsingTheZpro..erProcesses). 
> I was thinking about adding this to our Review Board and post-review. 
> How/where I implement this will be a little bit different based on whether 
> this is a customization or something I intend to submit as a patch, so I 
> wanted to see if this is something folks would like Review Board to do, or 
> not like Review Board to do, or what.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Report application name to Perforce using -zprog?

[Christian Hammond]

Oh, I completely misunderstood this.

I'm fine with adding it. We just need to be sure that it doesn't break
existing setups.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Paul Scott  wrote:

>
> Hmm... I don't know about that. I mean, if you really wanted to try and
> stick unique identifiers in your p4 commands so you could track which ones
> were currently pending, I guess you could, but I assume your Perforce
> administrators would get cranky at you. ;) Also, I don't really know how
> feasible that would be for showing progress... I mean, all you get from
> monitor is what processes are still alive, and how long they've been
> running. Maybe I misunderstood where you were going with that.
>
> The main purpose of throwing in a -zprog is just to make things a little
> prettier on the Perforce side. It lets you identify your application to the
> server, so logs and monitor output will display that instead of a generic
> "p4" (for post-review) or whatever the p4 python api reports (for Review
> Board). Mostly this is just a way of playing nice in the general Perforce
> environment. Though this might also allow RB admins who also have access to
> Perforce server logs to get a better sense of how they are affecting or
> being affected by Perforce performance. (There may be other ways of
> identifying Review Board in logs depending on your configuration--user, RB
> server IP--though probably not for post-review).
>
> This wouldn't be a huge change (just tack that on to p4 commands, and set
> something in the p4python connection object) and I would think the only
> major reason not to do it is if people didn't really want Review Board
> reported as reviewboard or similar in their Perforce logs.
>
> -- Paul
>
> 
> From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Christian Hammond [chip...@chipx86.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 4:32 PM
> To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Report application name to Perforce using -zprog?
>
> So this would allow for reporting progress on, say, file fetches from
> Perforce? Something like that would be interesting for displaying progresses
> on rendering diffs, but would be a lot of work. We'd need to find a good use
> case for it and implement things in a way where our code could take
> advantage of this information without requiring (for all the other SCMs).
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Paul Scott  psc...@vmware.com>> wrote:
>
> Hey Review Boarders,
>
> My team uses the -zprog global option with a few major internal
> scripts/applications to help better track usage patterns. (If you're
> unfamiliar with -zprog, you can read about it here:
> http://kb.perforce.com/AdminTasks/SuperuserTasks/UsingTheZpro..erProcesses).
> I was thinking about adding this to our Review Board and post-review.
> How/where I implement this will be a little bit different based on whether
> this is a customization or something I intend to submit as a patch, so I
> wanted to see if this is something folks would like Review Board to do, or
> not like Review Board to do, or what.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

RE: Report application name to Perforce using -zprog?

[Paul Scott]

Hmm... I don't know about that. I mean, if you really wanted to try and stick 
unique identifiers in your p4 commands so you could track which ones were 
currently pending, I guess you could, but I assume your Perforce administrators 
would get cranky at you. ;) Also, I don't really know how feasible that would 
be for showing progress... I mean, all you get from monitor is what processes 
are still alive, and how long they've been running. Maybe I misunderstood where 
you were going with that.

The main purpose of throwing in a -zprog is just to make things a little 
prettier on the Perforce side. It lets you identify your application to the 
server, so logs and monitor output will display that instead of a generic "p4" 
(for post-review) or whatever the p4 python api reports (for Review Board). 
Mostly this is just a way of playing nice in the general Perforce environment. 
Though this might also allow RB admins who also have access to Perforce server 
logs to get a better sense of how they are affecting or being affected by 
Perforce performance. (There may be other ways of identifying Review Board in 
logs depending on your configuration--user, RB server IP--though probably not 
for post-review).

This wouldn't be a huge change (just tack that on to p4 commands, and set 
something in the p4python connection object) and I would think the only major 
reason not to do it is if people didn't really want Review Board reported as 
reviewboard or similar in their Perforce logs.

-- Paul


From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Christian Hammond [chip...@chipx86.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 4:32 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Report application name to Perforce using -zprog?

So this would allow for reporting progress on, say, file fetches from Perforce? 
Something like that would be interesting for displaying progresses on rendering 
diffs, but would be a lot of work. We'd need to find a good use case for it and 
implement things in a way where our code could take advantage of this 
information without requiring (for all the other SCMs).

Christian

--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Paul Scott 
mailto:psc...@vmware.com>> wrote:

Hey Review Boarders,

My team uses the -zprog global option with a few major internal 
scripts/applications to help better track usage patterns. (If you're unfamiliar 
with -zprog, you can read about it here: 
http://kb.perforce.com/AdminTasks/SuperuserTasks/UsingTheZpro..erProcesses). I 
was thinking about adding this to our Review Board and post-review. How/where I 
implement this will be a little bit different based on whether this is a 
customization or something I intend to submit as a patch, so I wanted to see if 
this is something folks would like Review Board to do, or not like Review Board 
to do, or what.

Thanks,
Paul Scott






--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Review Board 1.0 RC3 released

[Christian Hammond]

Hi everyone,

I've just put out a release of 1.0 RC3, which should actually be the final
RC as long as nothing else blows up. I plan to release 1.0 next weekend.

If people would test this release this week and make sure nothing is newly
broken in your installs, it would REALLY help us out!

Details on the release can be found at
http://www.review-board.org/news/2009/06/13/review-board-10-rc3-released/

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Report application name to Perforce using -zprog?

[Christian Hammond]

So this would allow for reporting progress on, say, file fetches from
Perforce? Something like that would be interesting for displaying progresses
on rendering diffs, but would be a lot of work. We'd need to find a good use
case for it and implement things in a way where our code could take
advantage of this information without requiring (for all the other SCMs).

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Paul Scott  wrote:

>
> Hey Review Boarders,
>
> My team uses the -zprog global option with a few major internal
> scripts/applications to help better track usage patterns. (If you're
> unfamiliar with -zprog, you can read about it here:
> http://kb.perforce.com/AdminTasks/SuperuserTasks/UsingTheZpro..erProcesses).
> I was thinking about adding this to our Review Board and post-review.
> How/where I implement this will be a little bit different based on whether
> this is a customization or something I intend to submit as a patch, so I
> wanted to see if this is something folks would like Review Board to do, or
> not like Review Board to do, or what.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul Scott
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: MySQLdb-1.2.1p2 or newer is required; you have 1.2.1

[Christian Hammond]

Sometimes a distro will have Apache configured with one version of Python
(say, 2.4) while /usr/bin/python is 2.5. I've seen this on a RHEL5 machine,
though it's possible that's because someone installed a newer Python.

What's the site-packages path containing the new MySQLdb?

Also, do you see the old one installed in that site-packages?

And did you restart the web server after upgrading this?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Josh Joy  wrote:

>
> I'm not entirely sure what that means?
>
> How do I now which Python is running Review Board? I'm just using the
> one under bin...I have a fresh install of CentOS...so I'm not seeing
> multiple versions of Python...
>
> Thanks,
> Josh
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Christian Hammond 
> wrote:
> > Make sure you installed the new MySQLdb using the same version of Python
> > that's running Review Board.
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
> > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:26 PM, joshjdevl  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> What exactly did you install for drivers that reoslved the issue?
> >>
> >> I'm still receiving "ImproperlyConfigured: MySQLdb-1.2.1p2 or newer is
> >> required; you have 1.2.1", though I  have 1.2.2 installed and in my
> >> site-package
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Josh
> >>
> >> On Apr 7, 1:40 pm, Mohamed Mansour  wrote:
> >> > I had to install new drivers for python. Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > On Apr 7, 1:36 pm, Mohamed Mansour  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Sorry, I forgot to say that I am using Red Hat Enterprise 5, on a
> new
> >> > > server. +
> >> >
> >> > > On Apr 7, 1:35 pm, Mohamed Mansour 
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > > Hello, I am getting errors while running the tool:
> >> > > > rb-site install /var/www/reviews.example.com
> >> >
> >> > > > I have created the database, but have the following issues, any
> help
> >> > > > is appreciated:
> >> >
> >> > > > * Installing the site...
> >> > > > Building site directories ... OK
> >> > > > Building site configuration files ... OK
> >> > > > Creating database ... Traceback (most recent call last):
> >> > > >   File "/usr/bin/rb-site", line 5, in ?
> >> > > > pkg_resources.run_script('ReviewBoard==1.0beta2', 'rb-site')
> >> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line
> >> > > > 448,
> >> > > > in run_script
> >> > > > self.require(requires)[0].run_script(script_name, ns)
> >> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line
> >> > > > 1166,
> >> > > > in run_script
> >> > > > execfile(script_filename, namespace, namespace)
> >> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0beta2-
> >> > > > py2.4.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/rb-site", line 1280, in ?
> >> > > > main(sys.argv[1:])
> >> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0beta2-
> >> > > > py2.4.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/rb-site", line 1275, in main
> >> > > > command.run()
> >> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0beta2-
> >> > > > py2.4.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/rb-site", line 912, in run
> >> > > > self.show_install_status()
> >> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0beta2-
> >> > > > py2.4.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/rb-site", line 1134, in
> >> > > > show_install_status
> >> > > > site.sync_database)
> >> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0beta2-
> >> > > > py2.4.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/rb-site", line 519, in step
> >> > > > func()
> >> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0beta2-
> >> > > > py2.4.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/rb-site", line 224, in sync_database
> >> > > > self.run_manage_command("syncdb", ["--noinput"])
> >> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0beta2-
> >> > > > py2.4.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/rb-site", line 261, in
> run_manage_command
> >> > > > fix_django_evolution_issues(reviewboard.settings)
> >> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0beta2-
> >> > > > py2.4.egg/reviewboard/admin/migration.py", line 13, in
> >> > > > fix_django_evolution_issues
> >> > > > import django.db.models.fields as model_fields
> >> > > >   File
> >> > > > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.4.egg/
> >> > > > django/db/__init__.py", line 16, in ?
> >> > > > backend = __import__('%s%s.base' % (_import_path,
> >> > > > settings.DATABASE_ENGINE), {}, {}, [''])
> >> > > >   File
> >> > > > "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.4.egg/
> >> > > > django/db/backends/mysql/base.py", line 22, in ?
> >> > > > raiseImproperlyConfigured("MySQLdb-1.2.1p2 or newer is
> required;
> >> > > > you have %s" % Database.__version__)
> >> > > > django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured:MySQLdb-1.2.1p2 or
> newer
> >> > > > is require

Re: SourceGear Vault/Fortress

[Christian Hammond]

Hi Lynn,

To my knowledge, nobody has. Someone would have to work on this and submit a
patch (which isn't a huge amount of work, so long as there's a command-line
tool or Python API for communicating with SourceGear).

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:24 AM, lynnroth  wrote:

>
> Has anyone integrated Review Board with SourceGear's Vault or Fortress
> SCM products?  http://sourcegear.com
>
>
> Thanks
> Lynn
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: post-review under clearcase / HOW TO ?

[Christian Hammond]

Can you submit this to http://reviews.review-board.org/? All patches should
go through there for review.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Bartlomiej Celary <
bartlomiej.cel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I had this problem as well few months ago. Following patch to
> post-review should resolve it (attached).
>
> I had to fix some permissions in order to get rid of temp files + the
> '\n' (or \r?) was not stripped from the argument and also split_lines
> option was needed in a execute call. I don't remember if I reached the
> point of actually posting a review though as I had not much time to
> play with clearcase+reviewboard :)
>
> Regards,
> Bartek Celary
>
>
>
>
> 2009/5/25 mahesh :
> >
> > post-review under clearcase / HOW TO ?
> >
> > Hi, I have set up a django based review-board (i.e. without apache /
> > mod_python) and it came up well. I would like to post-review from
> > another client where I've installed RBTools (latest version_
> >
> >
> > I am in clearcase dynamic view and in vob path .. example
> > /vobs/src/tmp_vob/tools and checked out build.ksh
> >
> > and I am issuing following command to make it diff from predecessor
> > version and CHECKEDOUT version to RB as if posted by an admin user.
> >
> > Command -
> > post-review  --server=http://mvaidya-inl:8000 --username=admin --
> > password=admin build.ksh
> >
> > Please advise me if command usage is correct and I am getting this
> > errors for now
> >
> >  File "/home/mvaidya/EGG-INFO/scripts/post-review", line 938, in diff
> >return self.do_diff(self.get_extended_namespace(files))
> >  File "/home/mvaidya/EGG-INFO/scripts/post-review", line 802, in
> > get_extended_namespace
> >versions = self.get_previous_version(files)
> >  File "/home/mvaidya/EGG-INFO/scripts/post-review", line 781, in
> > get_previous_version
> >["cleartool", "desc", "-pre", elem_path])
> > ValueError: too many values to unpack
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: (A solution) 404 error when using reviewboard with lighttpd

[Christian Hammond]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:57 PM, joseph.pnc  wrote:

> And this line:
>   "^(/.*)$" => "/reviewboard.fcgi/$1",
> to this:
>   "^(/.*)$" => "/reviewboard.fcgi/$1",


Hmm, I don't see a difference between these two lines. Am I missing it?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Create new review remote API

[Gilles Moris]

On Fri June 12 2009 19:11:15 Christopher wrote:
> hg requestreview -m "Made some great new changes to component Foo"
> 

For Mercurial, you can evaluate this HG extension:

http://freehg.org/u/roccoblues/mercurial-reviewboard/

Regards.
Gilles.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---