git and diffs against branches

2009-10-23 Thread Chris Clark

Whilst I use other distributed SCM's I've only just started with git (as 
ReviewBoard uses it) and I think I'm having some trouble understanding 
git (and reviewboard).

What I'd like to do is post for review changes/diffs against a branch 
(not master/bleeding edge).

E.g.

git clone git://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard.git
git checkout release-1.0.5.1
## hack on stuff, e.g. git add myfile
postreview.py --server=http://reviews.reviewboard.org/  --debug

Here is my output (note headrevs of rbtools and this is actually posted 
explictly with -r1177):

  svn info
  git rev-parse --git-dir
  git svn info
  git svn --version
  git config --get svn-remote.svn.url
  git remote show origin
  repository info: Path: 
git://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard.git, Base path: , Supports 
changesets: False
  git diff --no-color --full-index master
  Looking for 'reviews.reviewboard.org /' cookie in 
/home/ingres/.post-review-cookies.txt
  Loaded valid cookie -- no login required
  HTTP GETting api/json/reviewrequests/1177/
  Uploading diff, size: 467617
  HTTP POSTing to 
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/api/json/reviewrequests/1177/diff/new/: {}
Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (105)
  {u'fields': {u'path': [u'int argument required']}, u'stat': 
u'fail', u'err': {u'msg': u'One or more fields had errors', u'code': 105}}
Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.


 From the instructions near the end of 
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/#gettingstarted 
(Posting Changes for Review) I get the impression this is not allowed? 
The checkout is based on master but it is a different branch,

I guess this maybe a bug report too as it fails to post but does create 
an empty review without printing out the review number. I ended up 
browsing http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/ and looking at the top to 
work out it had created one. Similar behavior if I just do a git diff 
and try and use the web interface (i.e. get int arg required error).

Help!

Chris


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Diff issue on new install

2009-10-23 Thread Mike Gunderloy
Setting up a new Review Board install (1.0.5.1) to experiment with.  
Install seems to have worked and I've set up a single git repo and  
used post-review to toss a review request in. But on trying to view  
the diff I get:

[Errno 32] Broken pipe

Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 153, in view_diff
 interdiffset, highlighting, True)
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 623, in  
get_diff_files
 large_data=True)
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Djblets-0.5.5-py2.5.egg/ 
djblets/util/misc.py, line 162, in cache_memoize
 data = lookup_callable()
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 622, in lambda
 enable_syntax_highlighting),
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 345, in get_chunks
 new = get_patched_file(old, filediff)
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 261, in  
get_patched_file
 return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file)
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 110, in patch
 p.stdin.write(diff)
IOError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe

Any ideas?

Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Apache hangs upon post-review

2009-10-23 Thread James

Per an earlier thread I'm trying to get Review Board working on a
Windows machine
with ClearCase integration.  I've gotten earlier road blocks and now
post-review runs
but it only gets so far and then the Apache server goes to 99% CPU
utilization and
post-review process hangs until I restart Apache server.  Here is
output from a debug
post-review run.  Any ideas?

snip
 HTTP POSTing to http://ndm-xp-vm1/api/json/reviewrequests/4/draft/set/: {'de
scription': 'sperry_releaseboard\nVIEWTYPE: dynamic\n'}
 HTTP POSTing to http://ndm-xp-vm1/api/json/reviewrequests/4/draft/save/: {}
 Review request draft saved
 Uploading diff, size: 4635
 HTTP POSTing to http://ndm-xp-vm1/api/json/reviewrequests/4/diff/new/: {'bas
edir': 's:\\'}
^C
S:\softdbTraceback (most recent call last):
  File C:\Python25\Scripts\post-review-script.py, line 8, in
module
load_entry_point('rbtools==0.2beta2', 'console_scripts', 'post-
review')()
  File build\bdist.win32\egg\rbtools\postreview.py, line 2522, in
main
  File build\bdist.win32\egg\rbtools\postreview.py, line 2254, in
tempt_fate
  File build\bdist.win32\egg\rbtools\postreview.py, line 463, in
upload_diff
  File build\bdist.win32\egg\rbtools\postreview.py, line 575, in
api_post
  File build\bdist.win32\egg\rbtools\postreview.py, line 556, in
http_post
  File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 124, in urlopen
return _opener.open(url, data)
  File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 381, in open
response = self._open(req, data)
  File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 399, in _open
'_open', req)
  File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 360, in _call_chain
result = func(*args)
  File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 1107, in http_open
return self.do_open(httplib.HTTPConnection, req)
  File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 1080, in do_open
r = h.getresponse()

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: git and diffs against branches

2009-10-23 Thread Dan Savilonis

Lobby for http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1144/ to get committed and
you should be all set. :) For now, the only options are to use the web
form or specify a revision range manually.

Can you explain more about the error with the web form? You mentioned
git diff, and if you meant that literally, that would end up diffing
your working copy changes against whatever is your HEAD. If your HEAD
is not a revision in the remote repository, RB won't understand what
you are diffing against.

Dan

On Oct 23, 2:10 pm, Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com wrote:
 Whilst I use other distributed SCM's I've only just started with git (as
 ReviewBoard uses it) and I think I'm having some trouble understanding
 git (and reviewboard).

 What I'd like to do is post for review changes/diffs against a branch
 (not master/bleeding edge).

 E.g.

     git clone git://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard.git
     git checkout release-1.0.5.1
     ## hack on stuff, e.g. git add myfile
     postreview.py --server=http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ --debug

 Here is my output (note headrevs of rbtools and this is actually posted
 explictly with -r1177):

   svn info
   git rev-parse --git-dir
   git svn info
   git svn --version
   git config --get svn-remote.svn.url
   git remote show origin
   repository info: Path:
 git://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard.git, Base path: , Supports
 changesets: False
   git diff --no-color --full-index master
   Looking for 'reviews.reviewboard.org /' cookie in
 /home/ingres/.post-review-cookies.txt
   Loaded valid cookie -- no login required
   HTTP GETting api/json/reviewrequests/1177/
   Uploading diff, size: 467617
   HTTP POSTing 
 tohttp://reviews.reviewboard.org/api/json/reviewrequests/1177/diff/new/:{}
 Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (105)
   {u'fields': {u'path': [u'int argument required']}, u'stat':
 u'fail', u'err': {u'msg': u'One or more fields had errors', u'code': 105}}
 Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.

  From the instructions near the end 
 ofhttp://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/#getting...
 (Posting Changes for Review) I get the impression this is not allowed?
 The checkout is based on master but it is a different branch,

 I guess this maybe a bug report too as it fails to post but does create
 an empty review without printing out the review number. I ended up
 browsinghttp://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/and looking at the top to
 work out it had created one. Similar behavior if I just do a git diff
 and try and use the web interface (i.e. get int arg required error).

 Help!

 Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Apache hangs upon post-review

2009-10-23 Thread Dan Savilonis

There was a problem like this with git support a long time ago. Can
you add use the diff only option and make sure the diff it generates
looks somewhat reasonable?

Dan

On Oct 23, 11:22 am, James jimspe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Per an earlier thread I'm trying to get Review Board working on a
 Windows machine
 with ClearCase integration.  I've gotten earlier road blocks and now
 post-review runs
 but it only gets so far and then the Apache server goes to 99% CPU
 utilization and
 post-review process hangs until I restart Apache server.  Here is
 output from a debug
 post-review run.  Any ideas?

 snip HTTP POSTing 
 tohttp://ndm-xp-vm1/api/json/reviewrequests/4/draft/set/:{'de

 scription': 'sperry_releaseboard\nVIEWTYPE: dynamic\n'} HTTP POSTing 
 tohttp://ndm-xp-vm1/api/json/reviewrequests/4/draft/save/:{}
  Review request draft saved
  Uploading diff, size: 4635
  HTTP POSTing tohttp://ndm-xp-vm1/api/json/reviewrequests/4/diff/new/:{'bas

 edir': 's:\\'}
 ^C
 S:\softdbTraceback (most recent call last):
   File C:\Python25\Scripts\post-review-script.py, line 8, in
 module
     load_entry_point('rbtools==0.2beta2', 'console_scripts', 'post-
 review')()
   File build\bdist.win32\egg\rbtools\postreview.py, line 2522, in
 main
   File build\bdist.win32\egg\rbtools\postreview.py, line 2254, in
 tempt_fate
   File build\bdist.win32\egg\rbtools\postreview.py, line 463, in
 upload_diff
   File build\bdist.win32\egg\rbtools\postreview.py, line 575, in
 api_post
   File build\bdist.win32\egg\rbtools\postreview.py, line 556, in
 http_post
   File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 124, in urlopen
     return _opener.open(url, data)
   File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 381, in open
     response = self._open(req, data)
   File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 399, in _open
     '_open', req)
   File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 360, in _call_chain
     result = func(*args)
   File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 1107, in http_open
     return self.do_open(httplib.HTTPConnection, req)
   File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 1080, in do_open
     r = h.getresponse()
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: git and diffs against branches

2009-10-23 Thread Christian Hammond
Make sure you also use --full-index on git diff.

I've been really busy the last couple weeks. In and out of town, busy work
work, etc. I want that change in as much as anyone, just haven't been able
to give it the attention it needs. Soon :)

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com wrote:


 Dan Savilonis wrote:
  Lobby for http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1144/ to get committed and
  you should be all set. :) For now, the only options are to use the web
  form or specify a revision range manually.
 

 Consider this me +1 for this ;-)

  Can you explain more about the error with the web form? You mentioned
  git diff, and if you meant that literally, that would end up diffing
  your working copy changes against whatever is your HEAD. If your HEAD
  is not a revision in the remote repository, RB won't understand what
  you are diffing against.
 

 Thanks to your hint I (think I) have this working now (I have a review
 ready to go). So this was user error/trouble learning git.

 I was assuming a diff was all I needed (and the branch would be
 assumed), what I needed to do was:


git diff HEAD file1 file2.

 i.e. add the HEAD.

 Thanks again!

 Chris

  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Diff issue on new install

2009-10-23 Thread Mike Gunderloy
Debian 5.0. /usr/bin/patch exists.

Mike

On Oct 23, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hmm, this is a new one. /usr/bin/patch exists, right?

 What distro is this?

 Christian

 --  
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


 On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Mike Gunderloy larkw...@gmail.com  
 wrote:
 Setting up a new Review Board install (1.0.5.1) to experiment with.  
 Install seems to have worked and I've set up a single git repo and  
 used post-review to toss a review request in. But on trying to view  
 the diff I get:

 [Errno 32] Broken pipe

 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
 py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 153, in view_diff
 interdiffset, highlighting, True)
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
 py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 623, in  
 get_diff_files
 large_data=True)
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Djblets-0.5.5-py2.5.egg/ 
 djblets/util/misc.py, line 162, in cache_memoize
 data = lookup_callable()
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
 py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 622, in lambda
 enable_syntax_highlighting),
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
 py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 345, in  
 get_chunks
 new = get_patched_file(old, filediff)
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
 py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 261, in  
 get_patched_file
 return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file)
   File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1- 
 py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 110, in patch
 p.stdin.write(diff)
 IOError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe

 Any ideas?

 Mike


 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Diff issue on new install

2009-10-23 Thread Christian Hammond
Okay. Well, it sounds like for whatever reason, the STDIN or STDOUT pipe to
patch is failing.

What would be interesting is to take the source and dest file and manually
run:

cat difffile | patch -o somenewfilename oldfile

There should be a /tmp/reviewboard.* directory containing a .diff file and a
file without -new that you'd put in the above command line. If there are
several /tmp/reviewboard.* directories, try deleting them all and then
reproduce this.

Also, you might want to look at the diff file and see if it looks sane.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Mike Gunderloy larkw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Debian 5.0. /usr/bin/patch exists.

 Mike

 On Oct 23, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hmm, this is a new one. /usr/bin/patch exists, right?

 What distro is this?

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


 On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Mike Gunderloy larkw...@gmail.comwrote:

 Setting up a new Review Board install (1.0.5.1) to experiment with.
 Install seems to have worked and I've set up a single git repo and used
 post-review to toss a review request in. But on trying to view the diff I
 get:

 [Errno 32] Broken pipe

 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py,
  line 153, in view_diff
 interdiffset, highlighting, True)
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py,
  line 623, in get_diff_files
 large_data=True)
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Djblets-0.5.5-py2.5.egg/djblets/util/misc.py,
  line 162, in cache_memoize
 data = lookup_callable()
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py,
  line 622, in lambda
 enable_syntax_highlighting),
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py,
  line 345, in get_chunks
 new = get_patched_file(old, filediff)
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py,
  line 261, in get_patched_file
 return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file)
   File 
 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py,
  line 110, in patch
 p.stdin.write(diff)
 IOError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe


 Any ideas?


 Mike



 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---




 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Issue 1366 in reviewboard: Group netster is not recognized by review board

2009-10-23 Thread codesite-noreply

Updates:
Status: Invalid

Comment #1 on issue 1366 by chipx86: Group netster is not recognized by  
review board
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1366

This is the issue tracker for bugs in Review Board, which is an open source  
project
used by many companies. You should contact your system administrator.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Issue 1348 in reviewboard: Expanding hidden lines broken by the 1.0.3 update

2009-10-23 Thread codesite-noreply


Comment #10 on issue 1348 by premek.paska: Expanding hidden lines broken by  
the 1.0.3 update
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1348

Unfortunately, I can't confirm the fix. The issue is still present in  
version 1.0.5
in our installation (tested with Chromium 4.0.222.4, Firefox 3 and 3.5; all  
in Linux).

The link Expand behaves still the same way as in 1.0.4. It is sending  
wrong
requests as described in comments #2 and #5 above.

I don't see our configuration obscure in any way; it is the following:
Response Headers
DateFri, 23 Oct 2009 22:31:23 GMT
Server  Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) DAV/2 SVN/1.5.1 mod_jk/1.2.26  
PHP/5.2.6-1+lenny3 with
Suhosin-Patch mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.5.2 mod_ssl/2.2.9 OpenSSL/0.9.8g
mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0
Content-Length  232
Content-Languageen-us
Content-Encodinggzip
VaryCookie,Accept-Language,Accept-Encoding
Content-Typetext/html; charset=utf-8
Keep-Alive  timeout=15, max=100
Connection  Keep-Alive

Request Headers
Host...
User-Agent  Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3)  
Gecko/20090824
Firefox/3.5.3
Accept  text/html, */*
Accept-Language en,en-us;q=0.8,fr;q=0.5,fr-fr;q=0.3
Accept-Encoding gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset  UTF-8,*
Keep-Alive  300
Connection  keep-alive
X-Requested-WithXMLHttpRequest
Referer https://.../rb/r/171/diff/
Cookie  rbsessionid=ae1bc5f72f8e0af9e9f8de5d857676be; ...

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Issue 1348 in reviewboard: Expanding hidden lines broken by the 1.0.3 update

2009-10-23 Thread codesite-noreply


Comment #12 on issue 1348 by premek.paska: Expanding hidden lines broken by  
the 1.0.3 update
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1348

Yes, I restarted both apache and memcached (and tried also disabling  
memcached),
reloaded the page multiple times, cleared the browser cache and tested it  
also in
Chromium's incognito mode.. ..just to be sure.

And I think there is not a problem with any cache, because it works  
immediately after
downgrading to 1.0.1. What about checking changes in the diff viewer  
between 1.0.1
and 1.0.3?



--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---