Re: post-review error with svn and gnu diffutils (new review with an added binary file)

Alternatively, the diffutils docs (http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/ manual/diff.html#Binary) state: Differing binary files are considered to cause trouble because the resulting diff output does not capture all the differences. This trouble causes diff to exit with status 2. However, this

Facing problem installing in Windows!

Hello All, I followed the following link to install ReviewBoard in Windows http://yuanyi-wang.blogspot.com/2009/03/install-review-board-on-windows.html I tried installed twice.. and from blank page .. i got stuck in page showing Manual Server Updates Required I tried re-installation PIL 1.1.7,

Re: Facing problem installing in Windows!

sakthi v wrote: I followed the following link to install ReviewBoard in Windows http://yuanyi-wang.blogspot.com/2009/03/install-review-board-on-windows.html I tried installed twice.. and from blank page .. i got stuck in page showing Manual Server Updates Required I tried re-installation PIL

RE: Facing problem installing in Windows!

I installed 1.0.9 on Windows XP a couple of weeks ago successfully. I used http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.0/admin/installation/windows/ and got it to work first attempt. Try installing using these instructions. Tim -Original Message- From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com

Re: Files in Patch not the same as files in view diff

I don't see any files attached. Which files were shown in the diff viewer? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:35 PM, tag_98007work tag98007w...@gmail.comwrote: I

RE: post-review error with svn and gnu diffutils (new review with an added binary file)

In which file would I look to remove the param? I am using a Windows environment. Thanks, Tim From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Christian Hammond Sent: August-19-10 8:43 PM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: post-review error

Re: attempting to install RBTools on linux

Huh... I really don't know. That makes absolutely no sense. Something is definitely pretty busted on your setuptools somewhere. All I can recommend is to download the egg manually and install it locally. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Re: Triggers

Scott, Sorry for taking so long to back to you, got tied up on other stuff. Very nice. You modified the base code in some spot or is the review summary generation already a part of RB 1.07? John On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Scott Quesnelle scott.quesne...@gmail.comwrote: John, I have an

Re: Triggers

Christian, Sorry for taking so long to back to you as well... This is a great idea, should make a lot of things easier to connect up. John On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi John, This support is coming in 1.6 in the form of WebHooks. On

Re: Issue 1511 in reviewboard: Diffs containing only indentation changes causes the diff viewer to look empty

Comment #5 on issue 1511 by combacsa: Diffs containing only indentation changes causes the diff viewer to look empty http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1511 I'm using Python. In Python, whitespace makes changes on indentation level - which means the code block itself is

Issue 1780 in reviewboard: diffs that are only indentation related (with tabs) are not visible in review (download diff is fine)

Status: Confirmed Owner: eduardofelipe87 Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1780 by chris.cl...@ingres.com: diffs that are only indentation related (with tabs) are not visible in review (download diff is fine) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1780 *NOTE: Do

Re: Issue 1780 in reviewboard: diffs that are only indentation related (with tabs) are not visible in review (download diff is fine)

Updates: Status: Confirmed Owner: eduardofelipe87 Comment #1 on issue 1780 by eduardofelipe87: diffs that are only indentation related (with tabs) are not visible in review (download diff is fine) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1780 (No comment was