Re: Reviewboard CMSynergy
Did you get a plugin for integrating CMSyergy with Review Board??Am also looking for a similar kind of thing for my project. On Tuesday, 17 March 2009 22:11:10 UTC+5:30, adi wrote: Hey David, Thanks for the response. I'm willing to help out on this. Sadly don't know where to start from. I looked at all the other scmtools in the repository. I guess I need to come out with another such interface for cmsynergy. Are there any docs that I can refer to? --aditya On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:51 AM, David Trowbridge trow...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: We're happy to include support for any SCMs out there, but it's not realistic for us to implement support for cmsynergy or other SCMs that we don't have access to. If you or someone else were to submit a patch for a cmsynergy SCMTool, we'd be happy to include it. -David On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, aditya vikram avi...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hey, I read a couple of posts about mapping cmsynergy to reviewboard concepts. Are you planning to have cmsynergy supported in Reviewboard? I'll be really looking forward as it as we use it as one of the few SCM tools (other being svn cvs) Thanks, Aditya -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!
Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed. One question I have is about RBTools? I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools. Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the same time? Also I understand there was a plan for a Python API for 1.7 (as well as the RESTful API) - is that still planned or has that slipped to 1.8 (or later) Cheers Dan On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:08:07 PM UTC, Christian Hammond wrote: Review Board Better Late Than Never 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to get this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was worth the wait :) There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface changes in this release. See the news and release notes for more information. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/ We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a try. Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!
Hi, Tried to install development version of 1.7RC, hit some errors. Debug info shows below. NameError at / global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined Request Method:GETRequest URL:http://107.108.50.12:8085/Django Version:1.4.2Exception Type:NameErrorException Value: global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined Exception Location:C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.7.4-py2.7.egg\djblets\siteconfig\django_settings.py in _set_cache_backend, line 47Python Executable:C:\Python27\python.exePython Version:2.7.3 Any clue to fix this? On Friday, November 30, 2012 4:25:52 PM UTC+5:30, Daniel Laird wrote: Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed. One question I have is about RBTools? I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools. Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the same time? Also I understand there was a plan for a Python API for 1.7 (as well as the RESTful API) - is that still planned or has that slipped to 1.8 (or later) Cheers Dan On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:08:07 PM UTC, Christian Hammond wrote: Review Board Better Late Than Never 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to get this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was worth the wait :) There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface changes in this release. See the news and release notes for more information. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/ We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a try. Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
After install getting an error, Manual server updates required
Hi All, I have just completed installation of review baord on CentOS 5 and getting following error on site Manual server updates required A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should restart your server. If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing listhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard. I tried following: 1. Tried upgrade using rb-site upgrade 2. create a fresh site with fresh database. Can some one please give me some directions. Regards, Rahul -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: After install getting an error, Manual server updates required
We'd need to see what updates it wants you to resolve. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:52 AM, rahul Metangale rahul.metang...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All, I have just completed installation of review baord on CentOS 5 and getting following error on site Manual server updates required A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should restart your server. If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing list http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard. I tried following: 1. Tried upgrade using rb-site upgrade 2. create a fresh site with fresh database. Can some one please give me some directions. Regards, Rahul -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!
If you upgrade your Djblets, this will now be fixed. Separately from this, though, I must strongly encourage you to move off of Windows as a host, as 1.6.x will be the last release where we officially support it. Going forward, it may break, and we won't be testing it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:20 AM, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Tried to install development version of 1.7RC, hit some errors. Debug info shows below. NameError at / global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined Request Method:GET Request URL:http://107.108.50.12:8085/ Django Version:1.4.2Exception Type: NameError Exception Value: global name 'InvalidCacheBackendError' is not defined Exception Location:C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\djblets-0.7.4-py2.7.egg\djblets\siteconfig\django_settings.py in _set_cache_backend, line 47 Python Executable: C:\Python27\python.exePython Version: 2.7.3 Any clue to fix this? On Friday, November 30, 2012 4:25:52 PM UTC+5:30, Daniel Laird wrote: Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed. One question I have is about RBTools? I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools. Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the same time? Also I understand there was a plan for a Python API for 1.7 (as well as the RESTful API) - is that still planned or has that slipped to 1.8 (or later) Cheers Dan On Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:08:07 PM UTC, Christian Hammond wrote: Review Board Better Late Than Never 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped to get this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was worth the wait :) There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension interface changes in this release. See the news and release notes for more information. http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/11/29/review-board-** 1-7-rc-1-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/ We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a try. Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes made until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: It's too easy to upload diffs wrongly
So... don't any users know how whether it's correct to upload full diffs or partial diffs? On Thursday, 22 November 2012 12:44:25 UTC, Will wrote: Where is it described in the documentation the correct way to make several diffs and upload them incrementally? We had a situation where one of our developers only uploaded partial diffs each time (just the changes since the last time he uploaded a diff), meaning there was no way to see his complete set of diffs together. I don't blame him because how was he supposed to know not to do that? We ended up hacking some extra instructions into the add review template and marking them bold red to try and prevent people doing this. ReviewBoard assumes all diffs are complete (from first commit to last), and it figures out the rest, allowing reviewers to easily drill down by revision if they want. If any of the uploaded diffs are not complete, then reviewers can completely miss changes that were made. a) where is the right way to add diffs documented? b) shouldn't reviewboard make it a lot more difficult to upload diffs wrongly -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: After install getting an error, Manual server updates required
Hi Christian, On ReviewBoard site following message is displayed it does not tell which updates are required? (I have used mod_python will thay cause problem): Manual server updates required A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should restart your server. If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing listhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard . Along with that one more message is there regarding permission to data directory for root user. Which i granted and restarted the server still that message is there. Thanks, Rahul M On Friday, November 30, 2012 5:22:17 PM UTC+5:30, rahul Metangale wrote: Hi All, I have just completed installation of review baord on CentOS 5 and getting following error on site Manual server updates required A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should restart your server. If you have any questions or problems, please contact us on our mailing list http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard. I tried following: 1. Tried upgrade using rb-site upgrade 2. create a fresh site with fresh database. Can some one please give me some directions. Regards, Rahul -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Issue 1774 in reviewboard: post-review can't handle symlink deletes properly for p4 changes
Comment #2 on issue 1774 by rgei...@gmail.com: post-review can't handle symlink deletes properly for p4 changes http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1774 This has also been seen in our installation (reviewboard 1.0rc2) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2809 in reviewboard: 1.7 RC1 broken links in admin dashboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chip...@gmail.com Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Critical Milestone-Release1.7 Component-Admin Comment #1 on issue 2809 by chip...@gmail.com: 1.7 RC1 broken links in admin dashboard http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2809 Thanks for the report! We've fixed it upstream and it'll be in the release. For now, you can just use the Settings page to access those settings. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
