Re: Review Board 1.6.18 and 1.7.12 released
On 07/28/2013 06:02 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone, We have a couple new releases tonight. Review Board 1.6.18 and 1.7.12 focus on tightening security, and giving extension writers a couple new abilities to make their lives easier. It's late here, so I'm going to direct you to the news post for further information: http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/07/28/review-board-1-6-18-and-1-7-12-released/ We also have a new guide on beefing up security for your file attachments. This is especially important for those of you with public installations, so please read it. http://support.beanbaginc.com/support/solutions/articles/110173-securing-file-attachments Packages for Fedora 18, Fedora 19 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (and clones) are now available for testing at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard They should appear in the 'updates-testing' or 'epel-testing' repository mirrors within 48 hours, or they can be downloaded manually and tried out from the link above. Please report any issues you discover with these packages to https://bugzilla.redhat.com and the ReviewBoard component. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Having trouble setting up a GitHub (Private Organization) repository
Thanks so much for the hint! Yes I never realized that it's the rbssh path. For some reason it's in /usr/local/bin but not in /usr/bin. sudo ln -s /usr/local/bin/rbssh /usr/bin/rbssh did the trick. Thank you again! On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: How did you install Review Board exactly? What OS/distro? Any special web server or virtualenv setup? If it's exactly the same error (please paste yours) then the PATH isn't set up to find the rbssh that was installed when installing Review Board. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Wei Dai wei...@google.com wrote: Hello, did you eventually figure out this problem? I also have exactly the same error log messages. Thanks! Dai Wei On Friday, May 4, 2012 7:29:13 AM UTC-4, Can Özmen wrote: I first tried adding the SSH key to my GitHub account and then as a deploy key to the private repo's account. Both fail with the same message: 2012-05-04 14:24:39,977 - DEBUG - Switch to new keys ... 2012-05-04 14:24:39,983 - DEBUG - Trying SSH key 3e2bacb616553a8258f03dc1b70f3a**9c 2012-05-04 14:24:40,204 - DEBUG - userauth is OK 2012-05-04 14:24:40,818 - INFO - Authentication (publickey) successful! 2012-05-04 14:24:40,912 - DEBUG - EOF in transport thread 2012-05-04 14:24:40,936 - ERROR - Git: Failed to find valid repository ssh://g...@github.com/**PhonoClick/Pesto.githttp://g...@github.com/PhonoClick/Pesto.git: error: cannot run rbssh: No such file or directory fatal: unable to fork -- Can Özmen On Friday, May 4, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: Do you have an SSH key configured and linked on that account? That could do it. If you check the Review Board log file, there may be more information. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Can Özmen cano...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still getting the 'a repo was not found' error. Here's a screenshot showing how I fill the fields. Any other gotchas that I should be aware of? Thanks, Can. On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Christian Hammond chi...@chipx86.com wrote: Try setting your own username as the hosting owner before getting the token, and then switching to the organization after. We'll be deploying a version soon that switches to the new API. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Can Özmen cano...@gmail.com wrote: But in the case of a private org that would make 'foo' the owner, which is the name of the organization. Then the 'Get your API Token' part asks for foo's password, which doesn't make sense since 'foo' is not an account that I can log-in with. -- Can Özmen On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: The Project Name is the foo in foo.git. The owner field would be the account owning the repo. So, github.com/foo/bar.git would use foo as the owner and bar as the project. Christian On May 2, 2012, at 10:03, Can Özmen cano...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian Dan, I'm on 1.6.6 and trying to set up a Private Org. Repo on Github. I've got an API token via the web interface. I've generated a key pair and uploaded the public part as a deploy key to the repo I want to connect to ((RB asked me to confirm the host afterwards)). But I'm getting the 'a repository was not found at the specified path.' error. In what format should I fill in the 'Project Name:' field and what logs should I check for more info. Thanks, Can. On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 8:33:23 PM UTC+3, Christian Hammond wrote: They've been nice enough to give Review Board an extension on the one API call we use, and are working on making the API token accessible somewhere until then. Said it may be a couple days. In the meantime, I'm making progress on v3 support, which will also come with a much easier repository setup process. Christian On Apr 17, 2012, at 10:03, Dan Z d...@modria.com wrote: I finally got a response from GitHub. Here is it: The API Token has been removed. We encourage all third party applications to migrate to API v3. Please check our latest blog post for more details: https://github.com/**blog/1090-github-api-moving-onhttps://github.com/blog/1090-github-api-moving-on ** Pretty much, they've said, We're shutting down the v1 and v2 APIs on May 1. Oh, and if you don't already have an API Token, then I guess for you, the APIs are shut down now. Brilliant. -- Dan -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
post-review, git-svn and --parent
Hi,
Please forgive me for raising this issue as I believe it has been raised
a couple of times over the years but I didn't see a resolution to those
issues and I'm seeing it with post-review 0.5.1. I hope you don't mind.
I have the following branch setup...
|- xxx (feature-x)
|- xxx
|- xxx
|- yyy (develop)
|- yyy
|- zzz (master) (git-svn)
...where xxx, yyy and zzz are commits.
As far as I understand it, to post a review of just the changes introduced
by feature-x excluding the changes introduced by develop I use the --parent
flag set to develop. If I do this the command fails with an error about a
NoneType (see debug output below). I believe the cause of the issue is that
post-review tries to do a git svn find-rev on the yyy commits which aren't
in SVN, so the find-rev returns nothing and post-review fails.
Am I doing the right with the parent flag and if I am is there any chance
that post-review could support this case in the future?
I can work around this issue by creating a new branch from feature-x and
rebasing that branch directly on master and raise the review from that
branch without supplying the parent flag. Although this workaround exists
the workflow is not ideal. Apologies if it's just me doing something stupid.
Thanks for your help.
Cheers,
Alex
(Please note I've changed some of the path values in the debug below to
obfuscate private info)
RBTools 0.5.1
Python 2.7.4 (default, Apr 19 2013, 18:28:01)
[GCC 4.7.3]
Running on Linux-3.8.0-26-generic-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-13.04-raring
Home = /home/alex
Current Directory = /path/to/dev/dir
Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive
DEBUG:root:Command exited with rc 1: ['svn', 'info', '--non-interactive']
svn: E155007: '/path/to/dev/dir' is not a working copy
---
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: git rev-parse --git-dir
DEBUG:root:Running: git config core.bare
DEBUG:root:Running: git rev-parse --show-toplevel
DEBUG:root:Running: git symbolic-ref -q HEAD
DEBUG:root:Running: git svn info
DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: http://someserver/svn/repo, Base path:
/trunk, Supports changesets: False
Finished checking the repository type.
HTTP GETting api/info/
DEBUG:root:Running: git merge-base develop refs/heads/feature-x
DEBUG:root:Running: git diff --no-color --no-prefix --no-ext-diff -r -u
develop
DEBUG:root:Running: git svn find-rev develop
DEBUG:root:Running: git diff --no-color --no-prefix --no-ext-diff -r -u
5fe45c363bc8600ef727d0b4a441c8ed30e76c84..develop
DEBUG:root:Running: git svn find-rev
5fe45c363bc8600ef727d0b4a441c8ed30e76c84
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/post-review, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.5.1', 'console_scripts', 'post-review')()
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.5.1-py2.7.egg/rbtools/postreview.py,
line 1334, in main
if len(diff) == 0:
TypeError: object of type 'NoneType' has no len()
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: post-review, git-svn and --parent
This looks like a bug, and not something you're doing wrong.
Would you mind trying this with rbt-post instead of post-review (same
arguments) and seeing what the failure case is?
rbt-post is the successor to post-review.
Christian
On Jul 29, 2013, at 8:48, Alex Lewis alex.lewis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Please forgive me for raising this issue as I believe it has been raised a
couple of times over the years but I didn't see a resolution to those issues
and I'm seeing it with post-review 0.5.1. I hope you don't mind.
I have the following branch setup...
|- xxx (feature-x)
|- xxx
|- xxx
|- yyy (develop)
|- yyy
|- zzz (master) (git-svn)
...where xxx, yyy and zzz are commits.
As far as I understand it, to post a review of just the changes introduced by
feature-x excluding the changes introduced by develop I use the --parent flag
set to develop. If I do this the command fails with an error about a
NoneType (see debug output below). I believe the cause of the issue is that
post-review tries to do a git svn find-rev on the yyy commits which aren't in
SVN, so the find-rev returns nothing and post-review fails.
Am I doing the right with the parent flag and if I am is there any chance
that post-review could support this case in the future?
I can work around this issue by creating a new branch from feature-x and
rebasing that branch directly on master and raise the review from that branch
without supplying the parent flag. Although this workaround exists the
workflow is not ideal. Apologies if it's just me doing something stupid.
Thanks for your help.
Cheers,
Alex
(Please note I've changed some of the path values in the debug below to
obfuscate private info)
RBTools 0.5.1
Python 2.7.4 (default, Apr 19 2013, 18:28:01)
[GCC 4.7.3]
Running on Linux-3.8.0-26-generic-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-13.04-raring
Home = /home/alex
Current Directory = /path/to/dev/dir
Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive
DEBUG:root:Command exited with rc 1: ['svn', 'info', '--non-interactive']
svn: E155007: '/path/to/dev/dir' is not a working copy
---
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Git repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: git rev-parse --git-dir
DEBUG:root:Running: git config core.bare
DEBUG:root:Running: git rev-parse --show-toplevel
DEBUG:root:Running: git symbolic-ref -q HEAD
DEBUG:root:Running: git svn info
DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: http://someserver/svn/repo, Base path:
/trunk, Supports changesets: False
Finished checking the repository type.
HTTP GETting api/info/
DEBUG:root:Running: git merge-base develop refs/heads/feature-x
DEBUG:root:Running: git diff --no-color --no-prefix --no-ext-diff -r -u
develop
DEBUG:root:Running: git svn find-rev develop
DEBUG:root:Running: git diff --no-color --no-prefix --no-ext-diff -r -u
5fe45c363bc8600ef727d0b4a441c8ed30e76c84..develop
DEBUG:root:Running: git svn find-rev 5fe45c363bc8600ef727d0b4a441c8ed30e76c84
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/post-review, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.5.1', 'console_scripts', 'post-review')()
File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.5.1-py2.7.egg/rbtools/postreview.py,
line 1334, in main
if len(diff) == 0:
TypeError: object of type 'NoneType' has no len()
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Which version of Ubuntu is supported for latest 1.7.12 ReviewBoard release?
Chris, We are considering Ubuntu installation for latest upgrade to 1.7.12 ReviewBoard release. Which Ubuntu version installation is supported for ReviewBoard? Thanks a lot Kunjal -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
