Hi,
thanks ... so I did a small exercise for myself, I'll try this ReviewBot
K
Dne čtvrtek, 20. února 2014 1:19:54 UTC+1 Javins, Walt napsal(a):
Hi Karel,
I’m aware of at least one other community project that does automated
static code analysis:
Thank you David.
On Monday, February 17, 2014 5:06:34 PM UTC, Mohnish Jadwani wrote:
Dear All,
I'm working on a Rails 2.1 app which uses Ruby 1.8.7. Will review board
help in code review of an older version of Rails ? I'm sorry this might
sound like a basic question, but I don't know
I'm seeing a couple issues with the perforce integration as well. The one
above with the case mismatch, as well as the --p4-client parameter is not
respected in RBTools 0.5.7.
An integration with eclipse and reviewboard
(https://code.google.com/p/p4reviewboard/) breaks because this parameter
Walt,
Thanks. We'll get this fixed for the next 1.7.x point release.
-David
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Javins, Walt walt.jav...@isilon.comwrote:
Thanks David!
I’ve filed the bug here:
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3256
Let me know what else I can do
Darryl,
The --p4-* options have a bug where settings in a .p4config file still had
higher priority than the command-line options. I'll make sure that the fix
for that bug is in the next rbtools point release.
Thanks,
-David
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Darryl McCutcheon
On Wednesday, 19 February 2014 16:36:21 UTC+1, Allen wrote:
Really good question!
I also encounter the same problem. Developers dont want to wait until the
previous review passed to work on the next issue.
One solution I think is, once a review passed, apply that review`s patch
file to
On Wednesday, 19 February 2014 21:15:31 UTC+1, David Trowbridge wrote:
The typical way that other dvcs users do this is to have local branches
for each piece of work, and post from each of those. I don't know enough
about bzr's workflow to know if that would be appropriate (though I recall
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Allen zhangsan8...@gmail.com wrote:
I have no idea why the review board changes the paths from local to remote
server, at least it should keep the local working copy`s path.
Here`s a example of what those paths look like:
---
Hey everyone,
We've just released 2.0 beta 3, which is a pretty significant release, and
the last beta in the 2.0 cycle.
We've done a lot of polish and made a number of improvements in this beta,
and we'd love to have you give it a try.
The news announcement, and links to release notes and
Comment #17 on issue 3045 by saar.net...@gmail.com: when updating new diff
on existing reviews on reviewboard server in clearcase source file revision
is not LATEST
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3045
Thanks Allot :-)
Adding the --publish did the trick :-)
--
You
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3257 by frikoda...@gmail.com: LDAP Authentication Error with
Email Attribute
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3257
What version are you running?
1.7.21
What's the URL of the page containing the
Comment #1 on issue 3257 by frikoda...@gmail.com: LDAP Authentication Error
with Email Attribute
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3257
I'm using BitNami pre-packaged version of ReviewBoard 1.7.21 and
python-ldap-2.4.13.win32-py2.7 package for LDAP support.
--
You
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3256 by trowb...@gmail.com: unable to log in (http 500)
when using ldap auth backend + unicode password
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3256
Fixed in release-1.7.x (55b7c92). Thanks!
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 3257 by trowb...@gmail.com: LDAP Authentication Error
with Email Attribute
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3257
Fixed in release-1.7.x (f32c957). Thanks!
--
You received this message because this project is configured
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 3252 by trowb...@gmail.com:
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252
Fixed in release-2.0.x (5430221). Thanks!
--
You received this message because this project is
15 matches
Mail list logo