Re: Issue 3802 in reviewboard: Negative numbers in the dashboard Incoming sidebar

2015-03-11 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 3669 Comment #3 on issue 3802 by trowb...@gmail.com: Negative numbers in the dashboard Incoming sidebar https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3802 OK, in that case I'll suggest you run fixreviewcounts, and I'll merge

Re: Issue 3802 in reviewboard: Negative numbers in the dashboard Incoming sidebar

2015-03-11 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 3802 by trowb...@gmail.com: Negative numbers in the dashboard Incoming sidebar https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3802 I don't suppose you have some procedure that can induce this? We've fixed most of the issues that

Re: Issue 3802 in reviewboard: Negative numbers in the dashboard Incoming sidebar

2015-03-11 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 3802 by jai...@energysavvy.com: Negative numbers in the dashboard Incoming sidebar https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3802 No, unfortunately I'm not sure what caused it. Most people on my team are having the same issue though. -- You received this

Issue 3803 in reviewboard: Error publishing review due to unicode characters

2015-03-11 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3803 by msu...@aurea.com: Error publishing review due to unicode characters https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3803 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its entirety, or

HELP! Restore from a pg_dump?

2015-03-11 Thread Craig Emery
I've ended up in a sorry situation. I don't know how I really got into this. I found lots of this in my /var/log/apache2/error.log [Sun Mar 08 06:25:22 2015] [error] ERROR:root:Could not load siteconfig: relation django_site does not exist [Sun Mar 08 06:25:22 2015] [error] LINE 1:

Issue 3804 in reviewboard: Error editing description with markup due to unicode characters

2015-03-11 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3804 by msu...@aurea.com: Error editing description with markup due to unicode characters https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3804 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its

Re: CRITICAL: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0x96 in position 19: invalid start byte

2015-03-11 Thread David Trowbridge
Thanks for the debug info. I'm currently working on this, and we'll get it fixed in the next version of RBTools. -David On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:02 AM Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN ovidiu@gmail.com wrote: Fixed. Once the character – ( using ISO-8859-15 encoding ) that looks like == was removed

Re: Issue 3770 in reviewboard: rbt post with 0.7.1 release get the error: UnicodeDecodeError

2015-03-11 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: PendingReview Owner: trowb...@gmail.com Labels: Component-RBTools Comment #1 on issue 3770 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbt post with 0.7.1 release get the error: UnicodeDecodeError https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3770 (No comment was

CRITICAL: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0x96 in position 19: invalid start byte

2015-03-11 Thread Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN
I've made some changes and added a few new files in my SVN checkout. Now I'm trying to update a review request using rbtools. $ rbt post -r 27 One or more files in your changeset has history scheduled with commit. Please try again with '--svn-show-copies-a s-adds=y/n' $ rbt post -r 27

Re: CRITICAL: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0x96 in position 19: invalid start byte

2015-03-11 Thread Christian Hammond
It's possible it's missing the en_US locale, which is needed to keep Subversion from localizing some strings they shouldn't be localizing, which we need to parse. There's going to be some package available for your distribution that provides it, but it'll be distribution-dependent. You'll need

Re: CRITICAL: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0x96 in position 19: invalid start byte

2015-03-11 Thread Christian Hammond
Would you be able to provide the output of svn diff --diff-cmd=diff --notice-ancestry -r BASE --show-copies-as-adds ? Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message-

Re: CRITICAL: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0x96 in position 19: invalid start byte

2015-03-11 Thread Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN
I'm pasting the debug output here: $ rbt post -r 27 --svn-show-copies-as-adds=y -d RBTools 0.7.1 Python 2.7.9 (default, Dec 11 2014, 04:42:00) [GCC 4.9.2] Running on Linux-3.18.6-1-ARCH-x86_64-with-glibc2.2.5 Home = /home/bogdano Current directory =

Re: CRITICAL: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0x96 in position 19: invalid start byte

2015-03-11 Thread Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN
I've Updated it. Now it's broken: $ rbt diff --svn-show-copies-as-adds=y -d RBTools 0.7.2 Python 2.7.9 (default, Dec 11 2014, 04:42:00) [GCC 4.9.2] Running on Linux-3.18.6-1-ARCH-x86_64-with-glibc2.2.5 Home = /home/bogdano Current

Re: CRITICAL: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0x96 in position 19: invalid start byte

2015-03-11 Thread Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN
No, it didn't get further. I've fixed the locale. I had : $ locale -a C en_US en_US.iso88591 POSIX ro_RO.utf8 And I've changed it to: $ locale -a C en_US.utf8 POSIX ro_RO.utf8 Now I get the same error as before: $ rbt diff --svn-show-copies-as-adds=y -d

Re: CRITICAL: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0x96 in position 19: invalid start byte

2015-03-11 Thread Christian Hammond
Can you upgrade to 0.7.2 and give that a try? We've fixed some Unicode issues since 0.7.1. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN

Re: CRITICAL: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0x96 in position 19: invalid start byte

2015-03-11 Thread Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN
Fixed. Once the character – ( using ISO-8859-15 encoding ) that looks like == was removed form the diff, RBT worked fine. This seems to me like a bug in RBT. miercuri, 11 martie 2015, 10:53:25 UTC+2, Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN a scris: I cannot provide the diff. Sorry. It seems to me like a regular

Re: Issue 3792 in reviewboard: Outlook message (.msg extension) upload fails in 2.0.13

2015-03-11 Thread reviewboard
Comment #8 on issue 3792 by raav...@gmail.com: Outlook message (.msg extension) upload fails in 2.0.13 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3792 Hello, Good morning. I have tested the 2.0.14 release few minutes back. Thank you for providing the quick fix. Two

Re: Issue 3687 in reviewboard: rbt - helpful error message when repository cannot be found

2015-03-11 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #5 on issue 3687 by chip...@gmail.com: rbt - helpful error message when repository cannot be found https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3687 Can you share the .reviewboardrc file? -- You received this message because this project