\__init__.py, line 87, in get_object_or_404
raise Http404('No %s matches the given query.' %
queryset.model._meta.object_name)
Http404: No FileDiff matches the given query.
The diff was uploaded via the post-review tool.
Pv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
and used the admin to
view the review request draft to change I got a 500 error.
Once published I can admin the non-draft review just fine.
Pv
On Sep 23, 5:05 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi,
Yep, this is the right mailing list.
So first of all, did you mean to install
and that simplejson
is for legacy support on 2.5 2.4.
So why does easy_install rbtools want to install simplejson?
Thanks!
Pv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http
of the error, but the code of post-review
looks like it should ignore this.
Am I doing something wrong?
Pv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http
Duh! This is a diff problem that I ran in to before...fixing now.
Pv
On Oct 29, 10:43 am, Pv p...@swooby.com wrote:
I am doing a post-commit review on a teammate's checked in C# code on
an SVN server.
I run:
post-review -d --revision-range=24506
And I get the following output: svn info
Opened 1378
Pv
On Oct 29, 11:34 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Glad you figured it out. We need to check for that and fail gracefully.
Would you mind filing a bug so we can track it for the release?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board
I am using the following command to do a post-commit review on a first
time checkin:
post-review -d --revision-range=24506
Obviously, I am not specifying a from:to range, but since this is a
first time checking any earlier from svn rev # wouldn't exist in the
newly created path.
The [debug]
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Pv p...@swooby.com wrote:
I had ActivePython 2.6 installed and installed ezsetup for py26 (on a
x64 Windows 2K8 Server).
I then tried easy_install rbtools and it failed when
I ran in to the same thing and opened a bug to make a missing diff
binary a friendlier message.
Pv
On Nov 6, 10:24 pm, Akhilesh akhileshjo...@gmail.com wrote:
After a lot of troubleshooting I found the problem: diff.exe was not
present in the PATH.
On Nov 6, 2:57 pm, Akhilesh akhileshjo
I've fought this one all day while setting up a new RB server.
Server: W2K3, Apache2.2, Python25, plus all of the other required
trimmings.
I have installed 2 other RB servers [on XP] and hadn't seen this
problem before.
I install the server and can log in and create users and change other
Running dev version does same thing; it immediately quits.
The output is:
Running dependency checks (set DEBUG=False to turn this off)...
Warning: p4python (=07.3) not found. Perforce integration will not
work.
Warning: hg not found. Mercurial integration will not work.
Warning: PyLucene (with
Well, I cleaned my W2K3 Server's Python25 directory and reinstalled
all required modules and things started to work fine.
I inherited the machine, and I guess it was in a dirty state. :(
All is good now!
Pv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board
NOTE: If I manually browse to my reviewboard server and upload the
diff it accepts it no problem.
I am not doing anything to intentionally encode these files beyond the
default VS2K8 encoding.
Pv
On Feb 23, 4:20 pm, Pv p...@swooby.com wrote:
I have installed a fresh copy of Win7 x64 and VS2K8
1.1 alpha 2 (dev)
I am pretty sure this aborts in RBTools itself before it ever gets to
the server.
Again, a manual upload of the diff file to the server works fine.
Pv
On Feb 23, 5:27 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Pv,
Which version of Review Board is this?
Christian
in to the problem w/ default encoding I have tried
saving the culprit files w/ various other encodings, but nothing seems
to make post-review happy.
Pv
On Feb 24, 4:55 pm, Pv p...@swooby.com wrote:
1.1 alpha 2 (dev)
I am pretty sure this aborts in RBTools itself before it ever gets
Yes, I just commented that out and the upload was successful.
Pv
On Feb 25, 12:25 pm, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel th...@ginkel.com
wrote:
On Thursday 25 February 2010 01:55:42 Pv wrote:
I am pretty sure this aborts in RBTools itself before it ever gets to
the server.
Again, a manual upload
It should have been:
return content_type, content.encode('utf-8', 'ignore')
Pv
On Feb 25, 12:43 pm, Pv p...@swooby.com wrote:
Yes, I just commented that out and the upload was successful.
Pv
On Feb 25, 12:25 pm, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel th...@ginkel.com
wrote:
On Thursday 25
be.
Pv
On Feb 25, 12:48 pm, Pv p...@swooby.com wrote:
It should have been:
return content_type, content.encode('utf-8', 'ignore')
Pv
On Feb 25, 12:43 pm, Pv p...@swooby.com wrote:
Yes, I just commented that out and the upload was successful.
Pv
On Feb 25, 12:25 pm, Thilo
codecs.utf_8_decode(input, errors, True)
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode bytes in position 5-6:
unexpected end of data
u = unicode(s, 'utf8', 'ignore')
u
u'La Pe'
u = unicode(s, 'utf8', 'replace')
u
u'La Pe\ufffd'
Pv
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
rectangle around the initial BOM chars.
The existence of BOM chars is normal and should be gracefully/silently
ignored.
A red box indicates to me an error/warning of some sort.
If the BOM differs between the two files then that should be
gracefully indicated.
Pv
On Feb 26, 11:13 am, Christian Hammond
20 matches
Mail list logo
