--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4561/
--
New ticket #4561 by BenA
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
Tags:
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4489/
--
New ticket #4489 by jafar
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
I'm attempting a Reviewboard 1.6.9-2.0 migration. This is on Ubuntu 12.04
and I'm using postgresql as the database.
I've updated review-board with this command:
sudo easy_install -U ReviewBoard
Based on the release notes, I went ahead and removed PIL and installed
pillow, but then rb-site
What I figured out is you can
1. remove dependences of that extension(use the easy_install -m)
2. delete the .egg file
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 9:43:12 PM UTC-4, Javins, Walt wrote:
I was successfully able to get rid of this log spam by going to:
Hi guys,
Does anybody familiar with the Hook system of ReviewBoard?
The thing is my team really needs a feature that requires ReviewBoard to
create a Jira ticket along with a new code review request.
Write an extension is too much work for me and I also dont think it`s a
good idea to directly
Allen,
We don't have hook support in the way you're describing. What you likely
saw was our extension support, which I assure you is not that hard to use
if you have any Python experience.
Work is being done on official Jira support, though won't land until after
2.0.
Christian
, A.M. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:15:36 -0700 (PDT), Allen
zhangs...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Hi guys,
Does anybody familiar with the Hook system of ReviewBoard?
The thing is my team really needs a feature that requires ReviewBoard to
create a Jira ticket along with a new
And also, is that extension ready to use or still under developing? I can
do some test work for you if you like to.
On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 3:12:34 PM UTC-4, A.M. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:15:36 -0700 (PDT), Allen
zhangs...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Hi guys,
Does
Hi,
I am playing with the power back extension in RB 2.0 RC1 and find this
error when I try to enable the extension. Below is the traceback
The title of this bug is [Review Board] ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal
Server Error: /api/extensions/rbpowerpack.extension.PowerPackExtension/
Traceback
BTW how can I delete this extension? I am getting so many bugs about it
now, and the RB keeps sending bug report to my inbox...
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:09:23 AM UTC-4, Allen wrote:
Hi,
I am playing with the power back extension in RB 2.0 RC1 and find this
error when I try to enable
Thanks!
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 3:02:28 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey Allen,
The curren release of Power Pack is incompatible with RC 1, but we've
fixed it up internally and will have a release out soon. I'll try to
fast-track it, get a working release tonight.
Christian
Hi All,
I am wondering, does anybody know if there`s a Eclipse plugin for
integration with RB? I saw one in the Eclipse market which name is
Tao-reviewboard but it`s out of date and does`t help anymore. And I am
using Tortoise SVN as the SCM. Thanks!
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at
Thanks for your response Robert, I already found your cool project and I am
trying to play with it. So for now I have encountered some problems and I
think it`s better for me to post them on your github page, right?
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Hi guys,
First for all I want to thanks for your contribution to this amazing tool!
Last week I did a demo to my group and people just loved it very much!
But my manager did have a question that does review board have a user
report? Just like a manager can see how many code reviews a specific
Hi,
At first place, I can not upload any attached files, soon I realized that`s
a permission problem and I have fixed it. Then I can attach screenshots or
other files. But only text file`s content could be showed correctly, all
other images like .jpeg .png .bmp were broken. And when I click on
It works now, thanks!
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 5:38:30 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Allen,
Make sure you have the media path on your installation set to /media/, and
not blank.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
Review Board - http
Yeah, I will. Thanks
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 6:26:41 PM UTC-5, David Trowbridge wrote:
Can you file these on the google code bug tracker?
Thanks!
-David
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Allen zhangs...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
I am wondering is this a good place to report
I am wondering is this a good place to report bugs? If you guys prefer
somewhere else, please let me know! I just figured out two bugs with the
2.0 Beta3.
1. A user can not change his profiles. After I click on the save Profile,
all changes gone.
2. When I play with the diff between different
Hi,
Seems RB 2.0 has a lot of cool features and I want to give it a try. But
after I upgraded it, the review board toke a very long time to load and
finally a 500 error showed up. Any idea what`s going on? I also checked
my apache2 log file, it`s nothing there.
Anyway for to downgrade it to
Sorry, nothing in the reviewboard`s log
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:32:08 PM UTC-5, Bruce Cran wrote:
Is there anything in /tmp/reviewboard.log ?
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons:
No log file that`s something bother me the most...Any idea how to fix this?
Is it possible for me to downgrade to 1.7.21?
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:32:08 PM UTC-5, Bruce Cran wrote:
Is there anything in /tmp/reviewboard.log ?
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at
I just tried to install the 2.0 beta3 again, and during the installation, I
found few warnings(no error) may help.
They are:
Running Whoosh-2.6.0/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir
/tmp/easy_install-soGWSL/Whoosh-2.6.0/egg-dist-tmp-_iMeAQ
warning: no files found matching '*.txt' under directory
After the reinstallation, I also got some error log from the apache2.
[error] [client 10.50.12.48] mod_wsgi (pid=2238): Exception occurred
processing WSGI script
'/var/www/reviews.example.com/htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi'., referer:
http://10.50.12.159:81/dashboard/
[Tue Feb 25 19:16:19 2014]
Python 2.7.3
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 2:37:38 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
That error log shows you're running Django 1.4.x under Apache, and not
1.6.2. What version of Python did you install with?
Christian
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, Allen zhangs...@gmail.com javascript
. What version of Python did you install with?
Christian
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, Allen zhangs...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
After the reinstallation, I also got some error log from the apache2.
[error] [client 10.50.12.48] mod_wsgi (pid=2238): Exception occurred
processing WSGI
for upgrading
Review Board? There is definitely something wrong with your install.
Christian
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, Allen zhangs...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Python 2.7.3
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 2:37:38 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
That error log shows you're
UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
Run this, and show me all the output:
$ python
import django
django.__file__
import reviewboard
reviewboard.__file__
Christian
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, Allen zhangs...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
The upgrade command I used is
sudo
Yeah, I restarted the apache2 server after the install is completed. So you
mean I should not restart the server?
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:46:43 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, timc timcu...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Hi Allen,
On Tuesday, 25
Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Allen zhangs...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Yeah, I restarted the apache2 server after the install is completed. So
you mean I should not restart the server?
On Tuesday
Glad to hear that, thanks!
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:19:22 PM UTC-5, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 02/25/2014 04:15 PM, Allen wrote:
I made a mistake... I never ran the rb-site upgrade... Problem solved,
and I think it`s better to mention that use rb-site upgrade after the
install
How do you fixed this issue? I am encountering the same issue now. Thanks!
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 4:13:32 AM UTC-5, shaheer va wrote:
I got it fixed by modifying smtplib.py
On Tuesday, 27 November 2012 16:45:29 UTC+5:30, shaheer va wrote:
here is the log file content
2012-11-27
Really good question!
I also encounter the same problem. Developers dont want to wait until the
previous review passed to work on the next issue.
One solution I think is, once a review passed, apply that review`s patch
file to a new working copy without touching what you are currently working
After a code review is created, there`s a button for user to download the
patch file.
The problem I have here is, I tried to apply that patch file to my local
working copy, but the paths are wrong!
Seems the rbtool changes all the files` path when creating a code review.
Here`s a example of
:
Is it just me, or do those paths look identical? Those are paths relative
to the repository root, and doesn’t seem to have anything to do with remote
servers.
On Feb 19, 2014, at 10:40 AM, Allen zhangs...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
After a code review is created, there`s a button
When I run svn dff, I get these paths:
--- src/ReviewBoardTest.java(revision 167)
+++ src/ReviewBoardTest.java(working copy)
The paths above are my local ones, and I can use these paths do a apply
patch.
While when I run rbt diff or rbt post, I got those paths, and I can not
use those
/ReviewBoardTest.java, and the diff has
/trunk/ReviewBoardTest/src/ReviewBoardTest.java, you can apply the patch
using:
patch -p3 ReviewBoardTest.java
-David
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Allen zhangs...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
Yes, that`s the relative path to the Repository
36 matches
Mail list logo
