Re: Way to send branch review in subversion?
Are you trying to do the diff against the latest trunk or the trunk when the branch occurred? On Feb 3, 10:13 am, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've been poking around in post-review code but I still can't figure it out - is there way to send review for whole branch in subversion? Branch I mean /branches/my-feature directory in repository and everything in it. Diff will be between this and /trunk dir. Something like this. Greetings from Poland -- Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Way to send branch review in subversion?
There isn't any support in post-review for Subversion diffs on separate branches. The only place in the code (that I'm familiar with) that does a diff between two URLs in the repository is in SVNClient.diff_between_revisions(). You could probably use that as a model to add a diff_between_branches() that you could call from SVNClient.diff() when options.branch is defined. On Feb 3, 2:05 pm, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com wrote: I think about this scenario: 1. Developer make branche 2. Developer make changes on the branch 3. Developer merge latest trunk to branch 4. Developer run post-review --tracking-branch my-feature 5. post-review check is branch svnlook propget svn:mergeinfo containe svnlook youngest revision of trunk 6. If not raise error and ask about merging to latest trunk 7. If contain make diff between /branches/my-feature and /trunk I'm not sure this is fine but ... I think it is fine :) On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:27 PM, D Krueger dekr...@gmail.com wrote: Are you trying to do the diff against the latest trunk or the trunk when the branch occurred? On Feb 3, 10:13 am, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've been poking around in post-review code but I still can't figure it out - is there way to send review for whole branch in subversion? Branch I mean /branches/my-feature directory in repository and everything in it. Diff will be between this and /trunk dir. Something like this. Greetings from Poland -- Jan Koprowski -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Jan Koprowski- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing middleware reviewboard.admin.middleware: DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found.
There is definitely a problem involving mod_wsgi, Python, and
extensions
built with MSVC.
See the question Why do no Python DLLs built with MSVC load with
mod_wsgi?
that's on Stack Overflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3706293/why-do-no-python-dlls-built-with-msvc-load-with-mod-wsgi
The author there worked around by installing a pycrypto built with
MinGW.
On Jan 4, 10:38 am, mandrake mt02c...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I reinstalled the cryptolibrary and ran the tests using setup.py
test, ALL OK. I ran the tests with lowest trust level as well, no
diff (runas /trustlevel:0x2 ...).
So I figured it might be a user privilege thing, so I tried running
the apache service as administrator, but there was no difference.
This is seriously annoying.
On 4 Jan, 16:10, mandrake mt02c...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I've traced the problem to the Crypto library:
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File C:\\Python27\\lib\\site-
packages\\reviewboard-1.5.1-py2.7.egg\\reviewboard\\diffviewer\
\forms.py, line 9, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] from
reviewboard.diffviewer.diffutils import DEFAULT_DIFF_COMPAT_VERSION
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File C:\\Python27\\lib\\site-
packages\\reviewboard-1.5.1-py2.7.egg\\reviewboard\\diffviewer\
\diffutils.py, line 30, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] from reviewboard.scmtools.core
import PRE_CREATION, HEAD
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File C:\\Python27\\lib\\site-
packages\\reviewboard-1.5.1-py2.7.egg\\reviewboard\\scmtools\
\core.py, line 5, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] from reviewboard.scmtools
import sshutils
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File C:\\Python27\\lib\\site-
packages\\reviewboard-1.5.1-py2.7.egg\\reviewboard\\scmtools\
\sshutils.py, line 5, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] import paramiko
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File build\\bdist.win32\\egg\
\paramiko\\__init__.py, line 69, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File build\\bdist.win32\\egg\
\paramiko\\transport.py, line 32, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File build\\bdist.win32\\egg\
\paramiko\\util.py, line 32, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File build\\bdist.win32\\egg\
\paramiko\\common.py, line 98, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File build\\bdist.win32\\egg\
\paramiko\\rng.py, line 23, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File build\\bdist.win32\\egg\
\Crypto\\Util\\randpool.py, line 30, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File build\\bdist.win32\\egg\
\Crypto\\Random\\__init__.py, line 28, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File build\\bdist.win32\\egg\
\Crypto\\Random\\OSRNG\\__init__.py, line 34, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File build\\bdist.win32\\egg\
\Crypto\\Random\\OSRNG\\nt.py, line 28, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File build\\bdist.win32\\egg\
\Crypto\\Random\\OSRNG\\winrandom.py, line 7, in module
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] File build\\bdist.win32\\egg\
\Crypto\\Random\\OSRNG\\winrandom.py, line 6, in __bootstrap__
[Tue Jan 04 16:00:22 2011] [error] ImportError: DLL load failed: The
specified module could not be found.
I will try to find out more..
On 12 Dec 2010, 12:50, Dan birb...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you found solution to this problem,
I have the same problem now.
Could anyone give some hints?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
On Dec 1, 3:59 am, Travis dahlke.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to install Reviewboard 1.5.1 on Windows XP SP3 with Apache 2.2
and mod_wsgi. Below is my apache error log. In my browser I get stuck
on Review Board is taking a nap. Any idea what's going on? How do I
tell which DLL failed?
[Tue Nov 30 13:40:12 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] mod_wsgi
(pid=14184): Exception occurred processing WSGI script 'C:/reviewboard/
htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi'.
[Tue Nov 30 13:40:12 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Traceback (most
recent call last):
[Tue Nov 30 13:40:12 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File C:\
\Python27\\lib\\site-packages\\django-1.2.3-py2.7.egg\\django\\core\
\handlers\\wsgi.py, line 230, in __call__
[Tue Nov 30 13:40:12 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.1]
self.load_middleware()
[Tue Nov 30 13:40:12 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File C:\
\Python27\\lib\\site-packages\\django-1.2.3-py2.7.egg\\django\\core\
\handlers\\base.py, line 42, in load_middleware
[Tue Nov 30 13:40:12 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] raise
exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing middleware %s: %s'
% (mw_module, e))
[Tue Nov 30 13:40:12 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.1]
ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing middleware
reviewboard.admin.middleware: DLL load failed: The specified module
could not be found.- Hide quoted text -
-
Re: Upgrade problem 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2
The carriage returns in the settings fields of django_project_version were indeed the problem. I converted all cr/lf pairs to lf and the upgrade worked perfectly. Thanks for the help. On Oct 1, 4:52 pm, D Krueger dekr...@gmail.com wrote: I've tracked down the source of the problem, but I don't know of a solution (if there is one). I invoked rb-site on the test site we created when first testing 1.0.5. It worked perfectly. So I started using pdb to investigate where rb-site was failing on our standard site, which led me to: django_evolution/management/__init__.py(54)evolution()-None - old_proj_sig = pickle.loads(str(latest_version.signature)) Then I investigated the differences in the signature values in django_project_version for the working and non-working installations. The non-working one had ^M after every line because it had been migrated from a Windows server. My suspicion is that the signature pickled by the Windows server isn't compatible with the Linux server. Is that a possbility? I'm at a loss as to how to proceed. Any help would be much appreciated (as is the help already given). -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Upgrade problem 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2
I've tracked down the source of the problem, but I don't know of a solution (if there is one). I invoked rb-site on the test site we created when first testing 1.0.5. It worked perfectly. So I started using pdb to investigate where rb-site was failing on our standard site, which led me to: django_evolution/management/__init__.py(54)evolution()-None - old_proj_sig = pickle.loads(str(latest_version.signature)) Then I investigated the differences in the signature values in django_project_version for the working and non-working installations. The non-working one had ^M after every line because it had been migrated from a Windows server. My suspicion is that the signature pickled by the Windows server isn't compatible with the Linux server. Is that a possbility? I'm at a loss as to how to proceed. Any help would be much appreciated (as is the help already given). -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Upgrade problem 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2
I'm trying to upgrade my ReviewBoard installation from 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2. The installation works fine. When I attempt to execute rb-site upgrade, it fails. The errors are: [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named fields [!] Unable to execute the manager command evolve: No module named fields This is on Fedora 10 with Django 1.1.1. I then tried to upgrade from 1.0.5 to 1.0.9, but received the same errors. Any ideas? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Upgrade problem 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2
On Sep 30, 4:38 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: How did you install Review Board? I used easy_install to do the installation. What version of Djblets do you have installed? The installation upgraded Djblets to 0.6.4. On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:23 AM, D Krueger dekr...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to upgrade my ReviewBoard installation from 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2. The installation works fine. When I attempt to execute rb-site upgrade, it fails. The errors are: [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named fields [!] Unable to execute the manager command evolve: No module named fields This is on Fedora 10 with Django 1.1.1. I then tried to upgrade from 1.0.5 to 1.0.9, but received the same errors. Any ideas? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Upgrade problem 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2
The full output is: Upgrading Review Board from 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2 There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named fields On Sep 30, 5:27 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: What happens if you `rb-site manage /path/to/site syncdb` ? Can you see a full backtrace? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:05 PM, D Krueger dekr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 30, 4:38 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: How did you install Review Board? I used easy_install to do the installation. What version of Djblets do you have installed? The installation upgraded Djblets to 0.6.4. On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:23 AM, D Krueger dekr...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to upgrade my ReviewBoard installation from 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2. The installation works fine. When I attempt to execute rb-site upgrade, it fails. The errors are: [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named fields [!] Unable to execute the manager command evolve: No module named fields This is on Fedora 10 with Django 1.1.1. I then tried to upgrade from 1.0.5 to 1.0.9, but received the same errors. Any ideas? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Upgrade problem 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2
I'm sorry, I must be missing something. Here is what I did and the output produced: $ sudo rb-site manage /srv/rb/review syncdb There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named fields $ I apologize for being dense. I just don't understand where I erred. On Sep 30, 6:20 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: It needs to be the command I pasted. Running just rb-site won't help to debug it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:06 PM, D Krueger dekr...@gmail.com wrote: The full output is: Upgrading Review Board from 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2 There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named fields On Sep 30, 5:27 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: What happens if you `rb-site manage /path/to/site syncdb` ? Can you see a full backtrace? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:05 PM, D Krueger dekr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 30, 4:38 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: How did you install Review Board? I used easy_install to do the installation. What version of Djblets do you have installed? The installation upgraded Djblets to 0.6.4. On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:23 AM, D Krueger dekr...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to upgrade my ReviewBoard installation from 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2. The installation works fine. When I attempt to execute rb-site upgrade, it fails. The errors are: [!] Unable to execute the manager command syncdb: No module named fields [!] Unable to execute the manager command evolve: No module named fields This is on Fedora 10 with Django 1.1.1. I then tried to upgrade from 1.0.5 to 1.0.9, but received the same errors. Any ideas? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en-Hidequoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
