Issue 1013 in reviewboard: Comment Box does not show in screenshot page

Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chipx86 Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 Component-Screenshots Comment #1 on issue 1013 by chipx86: Comment Box does not show in screenshot page http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1013 This is fixed in r1892. You can upgrade

Issue 1013 in reviewboard: Comment Box does not show in screenshot page

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1013 by bacchusf: Comment Box does not show in screenshot page http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1013 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What's the URL of the page containing

Issue 1012 in reviewboard: strange characters in usernames allowed that later break rendering

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1012 by kimonp: strange characters in usernames allowed that later break rendering http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1012 ReviewBoard allows users to create usernames that it can't handle later on. I had

Issue 1005 in reviewboard: Problem Upgrading from Alpha 4 to Beta 2

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: Component-Settings Djblets Comment #6 on issue 1005 by chipx86: Problem Upgrading from Alpha 4 to Beta 2 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1005 Not sure what you mean by it saying "...". You mean without the "u" part? That wou

Issue 1005 in reviewboard: Problem Upgrading from Alpha 4 to Beta 2

Comment #5 on issue 1005 by mda...@dtlcontrols.com: Problem Upgrading from Alpha 4 to Beta 2 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1005 I can log into the admin UI and move around to everything except Settings and Site Configurations. Anyways I did some work and got it worki

Issue 1005 in reviewboard: Problem Upgrading from Alpha 4 to Beta 2

Comment #4 on issue 1005 by chipx86: Problem Upgrading from Alpha 4 to Beta 2 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1005 Sounds like the best bet is to modify this entry in your database by hand, either setting the settings field to an empty string (which will wipe out your

Issue 1010 in reviewboard: gCommentDlg.one("close", ...).close is not a function

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: Component-DiffViewer Comment #1 on issue 1010 by chipx86: gCommentDlg.one("close", ...).close is not a function http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1010 Fixed in beta 2. -- You received this message because you are listed in the

Issue 1011 in reviewboard: Interdiff doesn't handle mid-review reverted files correctly

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1011 by grossag: Interdiff doesn't handle mid-review reverted files correctly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1011 This was repro'd on our internal VMware setup, which uses Perforce. Not sure if that m

Issue 1005 in reviewboard: Problem Upgrading from Alpha 4 to Beta 2

Comment #3 on issue 1005 by mda...@dtlcontrols.com: Problem Upgrading from Alpha 4 to Beta 2 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1005 [{'version': u'1.0alpha4', 'site_id': 1L, 'id': 1L, 'settings': u'"{u\'mail_host_password\': u\'\', u\'cache_backend\': u\'memcached://localho

Issue 957 in reviewboard: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 3: ordinal not in range(128)

Comment #1 on issue 957 by i...@avalanchestudios.se: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 3: ordinal not in range(128) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=957 Upgraded to beta2 and still have this error. -- You received this message because

Issue 1004 in reviewboard: [RFE] Integrate review groups with Django groups

Comment #2 on issue 1004 by ivazqueznet: [RFE] Integrate review groups with Django groups http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1004 This probably goes along with the policy enhancement in #1008. That way the policy can be controlled via the standard Django mechanisms. -- Yo

Issue 1010 in reviewboard: gCommentDlg.one("close", ...).close is not a function

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1010 by ivazqueznet: gCommentDlg.one("close", ...).close is not a function http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1010 1.0beta1 gCommentDlg.one("close", function () {gCommentDlg.setCommentBlock(self).css({lef

Issue 1009 in reviewboard: Permission denied to get property XULElement.tagName

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1009 by ivazqueznet: Permission denied to get property XULElement.tagName http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1009 1.0beta1 Permission denied to get property XULElement.tagName http://example.com/media/rb/

Issue 960 in reviewboard: Diff line comment box is messed up on recent (3/13) RB nightly

Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: Component-DiffViewer Comment #1 on issue 960 by chipx86: Diff line comment box is messed up on recent (3/13) RB nightly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=960 Are you still seeing this? -- You received this message because y

Issue 953 in reviewboard: Diff viewer does not work on Mercurial ssh repositories

Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Component-SCMTools Comment #2 on issue 953 by chipx86: Diff viewer does not work on Mercurial ssh repositories http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=953 Someone will need to volunteer to take on the work for this. -- You recei

Issue 975 in reviewboard: Launching and moving comment box, backspacing over text are very slow

Updates: Status: ThirdParty Labels: Component-DiffViewer Comment #3 on issue 975 by chipx86: Launching and moving comment box, backspacing over text are very slow http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=975 This might be faster in general with the new jQuery, but

Issue 984 in reviewboard: Review with no summary can't be selected in administrator mode

Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: Component-Admin Comment #1 on issue 984 by chipx86: Review with no summary can't be selected in administrator mode http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=984 Users shouldn't be able to create one without a subject. We could proba

Issue 993 in reviewboard: in rbtools, add simplejson as a dependency

Updates: Labels: -Components-RBTools Component-RBTools Comment #3 on issue 993 by chipx86: in rbtools, add simplejson as a dependency http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=993 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed

Issue 990 in reviewboard: Windows install instructions contain leftover linux bits

Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: OpSys-Windows Component-Docs Milestone-Release1.0 Comment #1 on issue 990 by chipx86: Windows install instructions contain leftover linux bits http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=990 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Issue 992 in reviewboard: Trailing slash in SVN repository confused post-review

Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 Component-RBTools Comment #1 on issue 992 by chipx86: Trailing slash in SVN repository confused post-review http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=992 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You receiv

Issue 993 in reviewboard: in rbtools, add simplejson as a dependency

Updates: Labels: Components-RBTools Comment #2 on issue 993 by chipx86: in rbtools, add simplejson as a dependency http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=993 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Issue 1000 in reviewboard: post-review documentation shows wrong svn property (reviewboard.url instead of reviewboard:url)

Updates: Status: Confirmed Owner: chipx86 Comment #1 on issue 1000 by chipx86: post-review documentation shows wrong svn property (reviewboard.url instead of reviewboard:url) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1000 (No comment was entered for this change.) -

Issue 994 in reviewboard: Description text for the "Base Diff Path:" field

Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Usability Comment #1 on issue 994 by chipx86: Description text for the "Base Diff Path:" field http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=994 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received t

Issue 995 in reviewboard: Make the groups field have a combobox

Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Milestone-Release1.5 Usability Comment #1 on issue 995 by chipx86: Make the groups field have a combobox http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=995 Auto-complete should work alright in those cases ("k

Issue 997 in reviewboard: add python-dev to install dependencies

Updates: Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Comment #2 on issue 997 by chipx86: add python-dev to install dependencies http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=997 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner

Issue 998 in reviewboard: post-review GUI for Windows Explorer

Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement OpSys-Windows Comment #1 on issue 998 by chipx86: post-review GUI for Windows Explorer http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=998 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this messag

Issue 997 in reviewboard: add python-dev to install dependencies

Updates: Status: Confirmed Owner: chipx86 Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High Component-Docs OpSys-Linux Comment #1 on issue 997 by chipx86: add python-dev to install dependencies http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=997 (No comment was entered for thi

Issue 1006 in reviewboard: BUG: Comment marker shows up on wrong line in FF

Updates: Labels: Component-DiffViewer Comment #3 on issue 1006 by chipx86: BUG: Comment marker shows up on wrong line in FF http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1006 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the o

Issue 1003 in reviewboard: [RFE] Group-private patches

Updates: Labels: Milestone-Release1.5 Comment #2 on issue 1003 by chipx86: [RFE] Group-private patches http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1003 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of th

Issue 1002 in reviewboard: [RFE] Invite-only groups

Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Milestone-Release1.5 Blockedon: 1008 Comment #1 on issue 1002 by chipx86: [RFE] Invite-only groups http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1002 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You

Issue 1008 in reviewboard: Tracker bug: Add a concept of "policy"

Issue 1008: Tracker bug: Add a concept of "policy" http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1008 This issue is now blocking issue 1002. See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1002 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of thi

Issue 1003 in reviewboard: [RFE] Group-private patches

Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Component-Policy Blockedon: 1008 Comment #1 on issue 1003 by chipx86: [RFE] Group-private patches http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1003 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You

Issue 1008 in reviewboard: Tracker bug: Add a concept of "policy"

Issue 1008: Tracker bug: Add a concept of "policy" http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1008 This issue is now blocking issue 1003. See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1003 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of thi

Issue 1008 in reviewboard: Tracker bug: Add a concept of "policy"

Status: Confirmed Owner: Labels: Type-Task Priority-High Milestone-Release1.5 New issue 1008 by chipx86: Tracker bug: Add a concept of "policy" http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1008 Different companies have different ways they want to calculate approval for a review. Fo

Issue 1004 in reviewboard: [RFE] Integrate review groups with Django groups

Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Comment #1 on issue 1004 by chipx86: [RFE] Integrate review groups with Django groups http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1004 We won't be changing the groups in this way, as the schema changes ar