Issue 646: postreview script diff command options -urNp do not work on
Solaris. gdiff required
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=646
Comment #1 by threebredagardens:
Slight modification required in my suggested code
ostype = execute ('uname -s').strip()
need to use -s
Issue 647: Error return value of _prepare_draft unused in webapi/json.py
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=647
Comment #1 by chipx86:
Silly me, I was thinking we were calling ReviewRequestDraft.objects.create,
but we're
instead calling the static ReviewRequestDraft.create.
Issue 333: Have diff summary field in upload diff.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=333
Comment #4 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Started
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or
Issue 551: Can't publish or discard comments in one review
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=551
Comment #1 by trowbrds:
I know it's a bit of a pain, but could you install firebug and get a
traceback for
this error? It's hard to know what's going wrong.
Issue attribute
Issue 591: Please Add Group *SchemaChanges
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=591
Comment #2 by trowbrds:
It's been a month with no answer. Closing out for now. If you can provide
the
needed information, we'll reopen and get this taken care of.
Issue attribute updates:
Issue 568: TIME_ZONE description URL in settings_local.py.tmpl points to
unhelpful page
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=568
Comment #1 by trowbrds:
Fixed in SVN r1501. Thanks!
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Fixed
--
You received this message because you are
Issue 649: Make it obvious that the file list is incomplete for reviews
that span multiple pages
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=649
New issue report by adsouza:
What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if any?
Issue 650: security is too permissive for public sites.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=650
Comment #1 by chipx86:
If you go into the Settings, you can disable anonymous access to the site,
blocking
out everybody who doesn't have an account.
Issue attribute updates:
Issue 650: security is too permissive for public sites.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=650
Comment #2 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
thanks for your quick reply! i'm just a user not the admin, so i didn't
know about
those settings.
--
You received this message because you are
Issue 649: Make it obvious that the file list is incomplete for reviews
that span multiple pages
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=649
Comment #1 by trowbrds:
I don't think this is actually a problem. It was particularly confusing on
Carmen's
review because both the first
Issue 655: File listing should indicate the type of change
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=655
New issue report by karthik.murthy:
*NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to
http://reviews.review-board.org/
What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if
Issue 652: Mails are not sent when user is in the CC
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=652
Comment #1 by chipx86:
That patch will add to the BCC list. We need to find out why CC is failing.
On the e-mails, are you actually seeing the right e-mail addresses on
the Cc line?
Issue 394: if a diff includes a file that has been cvs remove'd,
reviewboard won't accept it
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=394
Comment #7 by chipx86:
Can you please provide this as a diff on http://reviews.review-board.org/ ?
Issue attribute updates:
Labels:
Issue 394: if a diff includes a file that has been cvs remove'd,
reviewboard won't accept it
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=394
Comment #8 by torsten.flatter:
Done: http://reviews.review-board.org/r/555/
--
You received this message because you are listed in the
Issue 658: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658
New issue report by sudarsan:
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
Issue 659: Highlight trailing spaces in diff view
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=659
Comment #2 by chipx86:
We already highlight trailing whitespace, though it is for some reason
broken on that
review request. I'll look into it. It's likely due to the browser not
Issue 659: Highlight trailing spaces in diff view
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=659
Comment #3 by cordahi:
See also issue 419
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust
Issue 553: If base diff path is missing for new review, path to diff
disappears
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=553
Comment #3 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low
--
You received
Issue 493: Scands causes Internal Server Error
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=493
Comment #6 by trowbrds:
Closing because the needed information was not provided. If you can
reproduce this
and get a traceback, please add a comment and we'll reopen the bug.
Issue
Issue 577: Exception Type: DoesNotExist at /reviewboard/r/22/publish/
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=577
Comment #2 by trowbrds:
Closing because the requested information has not been provided. If this is
still a
problem and you can supply the needed information, please
Issue 665: Link to diff between revisions is broken
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=665
New issue report by castano:
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
http://maki/r/25/diff/1/#index_header
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Add two revisions to a
Issue 586: Publishing draft of comment shows error.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=586
Comment #2 by castano:
We are having the same issue. The error is displayed, however the comments
are
actually added.
The error happens when 'function submitReplyDraft(review_id)' is
Issue 586: Publishing draft of comment shows error.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=586
Comment #3 by castano:
The same error is produced when publishing comments through the diff view.
The
following message appears next to the publish button in the comment popup
Issue 667: Cannot mark item with a start when in list
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=667
Comment #1 by todor.hr:
start in the subject line to be read as *STAR*
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Issue 668: View Diff reports FileNotFound due to incorrect revision
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=668
New issue report by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create a patch file
2. Create a
Issue 666: view diff causes Error - cvs.py
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=666
Comment #4 by drgiri:
Is there any way we need to change the stuatus as assigned or info
supplied ?
I do not see any way to effect such a change ?
TIA.
drgiri
--
You received this message
Issue 450: Include an offset on file numbers in paginated diffviewer page
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=450
Comment #4 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Started
Owner: trowbrds
--
You received this
Issue 659: Highlight trailing spaces in diff view
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=659
Comment #4 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: New
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Issue 392: automatically save fields in the edit state when publishing
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=392
Comment #9 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: New
--
You received this message because you are listed
Issue 503: Add a link on the dashboard to view submitted review requests
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=503
Comment #3 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this message because you are
Issue 618: Return a sane response for API calls when Review Board is not
set up properly.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=618
Comment #2 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this
Issue 599: Unable to modify user information when NIS credentials used
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=599
Comment #8 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Started
Owner: trowbrds
--
You received this
Issue 489: [ ] DON'T SHIP IT button
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=489
Comment #10 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of
Issue 546: Post-review dosn't like apostrophe's
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=546
Comment #3 by trowbrds:
It looks like this wasn't a normal apostrophe, it was some sort of funky
smart quote.
What encoding is your system using?
--
You received this message because
Issue 559: Posting a new diff against a discarded changeset should create a
new review request
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=559
Comment #7 by trowbrds:
After discussing this with Christian, I'm going to say that we're not going
to change
this behavior. If you change
Issue 559: Posting a new diff against a discarded changeset should create a
new review request
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=559
Comment #8 by amordkov:
Please note that, as per comment #2, the title of the bug should
be Posting a new
diff against a changeset for
Issue 559: Posting a new diff against a discarded changeset should create a
new review request
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=559
Comment #9 by chipx86:
I may be changing Discard down the road but that's just a label. It's not
the same
as deleting (admins actually have
Issue 581: Dashboard defaults to Incoming Reviews, not last viewed box
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=581
Comment #2 by trowbrds:
Keeping state like this is tricky unless we plumb it through the views
somehow. It's
really easy for things to get weird if you're working
Issue 598: Enhancement: Editing the people field to add reviewers should
look at both the user id and First/Last names
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=598
Comment #2 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status:
Issue 581: Dashboard defaults to Incoming Reviews, not last viewed box
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=581
Comment #3 by chipx86:
Or just store a cookie and return the appropriate view based on that value,
making it
work like a query parameter.
--
You received this
Issue 559: Posting a new diff against a discarded changeset should create a
new review request
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=559
Comment #10 by amordkov:
I think it's not uncommon for a developer to want to really 'discard' diffs
that they
had uploaded, so that
Issue 672: Reviewers (Groups/People) cannot be edited on draft
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=672
Comment #10 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: NotABug
--
You received this message because you are listed in
Issue 472: HGTool does not support git style diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=472
Comment #5 by al.yazdi:
Why not taking the most recent revision then (tip)? I don't see any reason
of posting
a diff that does not apply on the most recent revision ...
BTW, Mercurial
Issue 677: CVSClient in post-review is particularly fragile with respect to
qualified domains
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=677
Comment #13 by skip.montanaro:
Thanks, that worked. It was just the base diff path I couldn't figure
out. I just published a patch:
Issue 640: Admin-Settings-General-Site Settings-Server adds an extra
slash to the end of the url.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=640
Comment #1 by skip.montanaro:
I encounter the same behavior. All generated URLs have an extra slash and
are thus
invalid.
--
You
Issue 614: Very poor performance with diffs against large files
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=614
Comment #2 by ciaomary:
We're having this same issue with large diffs. (we use perforce). CPU is at
100% for
a few minutes.
--
You received this message because you are
Issue 678: Failed patch results in Python traceback for diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=678
New issue report by Thomas.D.Marshall:
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
r/#/diff/1/
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Submit a review request with
Issue 678: Failed patch results in Python traceback for diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=678
Comment #1 by Thomas.D.Marshall:
On further inspection, the diff itself seems to be inaccessible and a new
Python
traceback is displayed for every attempt to access it. This
Issue 679: Update ReviewBoard to be compatible with official Perforce
P4Python API
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=679
New issue report by ciaomary:
ReviewBoard just released it's first officially supported P4Python API
(2008.1). Release notes here:
Issue 680: reviewboard does not complain about python-ldap not being
available
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=680
New issue report by ramez.hanna:
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
all
Issue 679: Update ReviewBoard to be compatible with official Perforce
P4Python API
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=679
Comment #2 by ciaomary:
It looks like ReviewBoard is using the Public Depot version rather than
official
release that just came out. See the release
Issue 497: Easy to forget to save/publish comments
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=497
Comment #5 by chipx86:
These are being addressed in my UI rewrite.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Started
Owner: chipx86
--
You received this message because you are
Issue 624: Can't add inline comments from diff view discussion tab
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=624
Comment #2 by chipx86:
My UI rewrite makes it a little more clear how to respond to a comment,
which should
in a way satisfy this bug.
Essentially, existing comments
Issue 495: I want a To Me column in the Incoming reviews page
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=495
Comment #4 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this message because you are listed in
Issue 602: Show the 'basedir' on the review request page
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=602
Comment #2 by trowbrds:
I don't really think it's a useful piece of information. All it tells you
is what
directory someone was in when they ran `svn diff` (or equivalent). This
Issue 682: Cannot login after fresh install under apache http.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=682
New issue report by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I tried the latest svn version and followed the wiki Getting Started
steps to install all necessary stuff. I setup reviewboard to work
Issue 297: Show selected diff chunk in a better way
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=297
Comment #5 by chipx86:
Got this working in my UI rewrite.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Started
Owner: chipx86
--
You received this message because you are listed
Issue 401: Comments should be inserted into diff below lines being
discussed, instead of in dialog box
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=401
Comment #3 by chipx86:
Making the UIs configurable makes it a pain to maintain, document and
support.
After careful consideration,
Issue 555: multiple-line selection in a diff doesn't work when selecting
upwards
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=555
Comment #3 by chipx86:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 Usability
Issue 682: Cannot login after fresh install under apache http.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=682
Comment #2 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I tried with version 1.0.0 final and have the same issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of
Issue 401: Comments should be inserted into diff below lines being
discussed, instead of in dialog box
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=401
Comment #5 by chipx86:
The key difference with the popup window is that we get intelligently place
it
initially but give users the
Issue 685: Allow user to change Email functionality
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=685
New issue report by rlogel:
We have Review Board configured to send email when changes happen. It is a
little annoying that a user still gets and email for changes that they
make. It
Issue 624: Can't add inline comments from diff view discussion tab
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=624
Comment #3 by gmueller:
I have several comments about this workflow, which is confusing a lot of
people.
First, I don't think there should be a Review and Discussion
Issue 333: Have diff summary field in upload diff.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=333
Comment #5 by chipx86:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Fixed
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Issue 687: Can't edit change description
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=687
New issue report by cuviper:
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
/r/id/
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
Issue 640: Admin-Settings-General-Site Settings-Server adds an extra
slash to the end of the url.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=640
Comment #3 by chipx86:
Fixed in r1531.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: chipx86
Labels:
Issue 592: Clicking: Report bug in reviewboard should open the link in a
new window.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=592
Comment #3 by chipx86:
The new UI rewrite won't let you navigate a page without confirming, if you
have an
unsaved textbox somewhere. So the worry is
Issue 589: Opera: Review location issue
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=589
Comment #5 by chipx86:
This works in the UI rewrite, so I'll close this when that's in.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Started
Owner: chipx86
Labels: Milestone-Release1.0
Issue 656: Opera: Clicking links to the actual files in the Diff keeps the
cursor on top, rather than navigating to the actual file's diff.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=656
Comment #3 by chipx86:
This is fixed in the UI rewrite. I'll close this once it's in.
Issue
Issue 588: Opera: Usability issues with tab autocomplete
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=588
Comment #2 by chipx86:
Fixed in the UI rewrite. I'll close when that's in.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Started
Owner: chipx86
Labels:
Issue 122: Show comment window content in draft form on main review page
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=122
Comment #6 by chipx86:
We'll have something close enough for this for 1.0. I'm not going to add
the review
itself, but there's something very very similar that
Issue 392: automatically save fields in the edit state when publishing
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=392
Comment #11 by chipx86:
This is fixed in the UI rewrite. I'll close this once it's committed.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Started
Owner: chipx86
Issue 452: Diff hotkeys functional in search field
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=452
Comment #4 by chipx86:
This is fixed in the UI rewrite. I'll close this when it's submitted.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Started
Owner: chipx86
--
You received
Issue 587: Cannot discard draft
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=587
Comment #2 by trowbrds:
Closing out because the needed information has not been supplied. If this
is still a
problem and you can provide the requested information, please add a comment
and I'll
reopen
Issue 623: Base diff path can't change when attaching updated diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=623
Comment #3 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: UnableToReproduce
--
You received this message because you
Issue 683: global name 'ClientError' is not defined
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=683
Comment #1 by chipx86:
Though the error isn't very clear, this sounds like you don't really have
pysvn
installed.
You can check by running the following on the command line:
python
Issue 684: web services calls return incorrect Content-Type
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=684
Comment #1 by chipx86:
Fixed in Djblets r11900.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: chipx86
Labels: Djblets Component-API Milestone-Release1.0
Issue 648: Comment in unchanged code appears, but not clickable
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=648
Comment #1 by chipx86:
This will probably be fixed in the UI rewrite. This code has all been
rewritten from
scratch.
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Started
Issue 497: Easy to forget to save/publish comments
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=497
Comment #6 by chipx86:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release1.0
--
You received this message because you are listed in
Issue 688: Don't see comment button in review page
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=688
New issue report by skip.montanaro:
I submitted a review request to our local (test) reviewboard instance:
http://our.internal.server:8000/r/4/
One of my colleagues commented with
Issue 688: Don't see comment button in review page
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=688
Comment #1 by skip.montanaro:
Duh... Wasn't logged in. :-} (sheepish grin)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because
Issue 688: Don't see comment button in review page
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=688
Comment #2 by skip.montanaro:
Can I close this issue somehow?
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this
Issue 689: review request emails don't contain change info
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=689
New issue report by eyal.lin:
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create a review request and publish it.
2. Make a change in the review request (modify branch field), and
Issue 637: E-mail review participants when Set Submitted is set or unset
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=637
Comment #1 by jamesdlin:
I would hope that this would be optional if it were implemented. I
wouldn't want the
extra email.
--
You received this message
Issue 637: E-mail review participants when Set Submitted is set or unset
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=637
Comment #2 by chipx86:
Yeah, it will be optional if we end up doing it, likely disabled by default.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the
Issue 693: ability to attach a comment when clicking [Submitted]
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=693
New issue report by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd like to be able to attach a comment when clicking [Submitted] to
close out a review. I generally want to tag the review with the
Issue 667: Cannot mark item with a star when in list
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=667
Comment #4 by thinkfly:
Same problem, with Django r9231 and Review Board r1537.
All star columns in lists are not working, though it reflects correct
status of
starred or not. Mouse
Issue 694: Group List Incorrectly Display iPhone Edition
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=694
New issue report by thinkfly:
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
/groups/
What steps will
Issue 695: Admin Logout URL
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=695
New issue report by thinkfly:
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
/admin/settings/general/
What steps will reproduce the
Issue 640: Admin-Settings-General-Site Settings-Server adds an extra
slash to the end of the url.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=640
Comment #5 by chipx86:
You may have to go into the admin UI and save again for this to be fixed.
--
You received this message because
Issue 553: If base diff path is missing for new review, path to diff
disappears
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=553
Comment #4 by trowbrds:
On the web server side, do we have the path on the user's disk? I didn't
think so,
which makes this hard to do.
--
You
Issue 552: Provide a template for the Testing Done and Description sections
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=552
Comment #4 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this message because you
Issue 553: If base diff path is missing for new review, path to diff
disappears
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=553
Comment #5 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this message
Issue 560: Indicate line termination
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=560
Comment #2 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of
Issue 696: Previous/next file shortcut keys are broken
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=696
New issue report by jamesdlin:
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
What steps will reproduce the
Issue 592: Clicking: Report bug in reviewboard should open the link in a
new window.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=592
Comment #4 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this message
Issue 602: Show the 'basedir' on the review request page
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=602
Comment #3 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: WontFix
--
You received this message because you are listed in the
Issue 613: Make dashboard customizable
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=613
Comment #2 by trowbrds:
The naming is a bit weird, but your outgoing reviews should all be included
on the
Incoming Reviews display.
I don't know that we can really customize this in a way which
Issue 607: post-review option to insert the review url into the changelist
description
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=607
Comment #2 by trowbrds:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue attribute updates:
Status: Started
Labels:
Issue 614: Very poor performance with diffs against large files
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=614
Comment #4 by trowbrds:
A lot of this should be fixed now that we properly cache files 1M, so
you'll only
get the performance hit once. There's still more optimization to
1 - 100 of 1768 matches
Mail list logo