Re: action.js does not exist

Hi, Changing the site directory shouldn't be a huge problem, provided you update your Apache config file, but that's a task for after we get this working in the first place. If you go to http://argosboard.com/media/, do you get a 404? Assuming you do, I'm a bit confused as to the cause. I

Re: action.js does not exist

Ok Christian , i will look into it and let you know the status. pubudu On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Might want to see if the change at the bottom of this thread fixes it:

Re: action.js does not exist

Might want to see if the change at the bottom of this thread fixes it: http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/e763f306aafb6300/72fbcc2ee2ab562b#72fbcc2ee2ab562b If it does, I want to know, because then we can fix it properly upstream. Christian -- Christian Hammond -

Re: action.js does not exist

Hi, Sorry, I should be more clear. You don't want to add those lines. You want to see if those lines already exist in your httpd.conf, and comment them out. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On

Re: action.js does not exist

Hello Christian, I tried that way also, here are the apache log entries. #FilesMatch ^\.ht # Order allow,deny # Deny from all #/FilesMatch [Mon Aug 31 13:02:44 2009] [notice] Apache/2.0.63 (Win32) SVN/1.4.5 DAV/2 configured -- resuming normal operations [Mon Aug 31 13:02:44 2009] [notice]

Re: action.js does not exist

Alright, so really, the problem is that you have Django 1.1 installed, and Review Board 1.0.x only ships the admin UI stuff that comes with Django 1.0. I was looking at this from the perspective of media files in general being broken, but I didn't put 2 and 2 together and realize that actions.js

Re: action.js does not exist

Thanks Christian, its great relief to me knowing what the problem.So what should i do now to make review request with current Django installalment? pubudu On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Alright, so really, the problem is that you have Django

cannot login after upgrade

Hello Folks, I went through the upgrade steps and upgraded reviewboard from 0.9 to 1.0.1 and in the end ran the command (output also shown) r...@reviewboard:/var/www# rb-site upgrade /var/www/review Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. Upgrading Review Board

Re: cannot login after upgrade

Hi Kash, What login method were you using? Standard auth, or something like LDAP/ActiveDirectory? How old was your 0.9 install? Did you restart your web server after the upgrade? I can't think of a thing that changed that would cause auth to fail. Christian -- Christian Hammond -

Re: cannot login after upgrade

That's the problem, the accounts.backends.LDAPBackend. That needs to be the full path: reviewboard.accounts.backends.LDAPBackend. You'll also need to make sure you have the python-ldap package on your system. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Re: action.js does not exist

Hello Christian, this is the access log entry and still can not make a new request 192.168.1.107 - - [01/Sep/2009:09:00:34 +0530] POST /r/new/ HTTP/1.1 200 1570 change number : 3076 ( one that shown near the file in the tree ) base diff path : trunk/ac_module/forms/ please help me to

Re: action.js does not exist

Hi, The change number is only used for Perforce. The base diff path should be the path to the directory in the SVN tree where you generated your diff, starting with a /. So, if you generated the file in a checkout of /trunk/mymodule, you'd use /trunk as the base path. Of course, if you install

Re: action.js does not exist

Hello Christian, I am trying to make a pre - reviews request using web UI. is there are any other s/w, i have to install, as my server is running on Windows 2003?. pubudu On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi, The change number is only

Issue 938 in reviewboard: Hyperlinks to code locations in the reviews do not function. Take you to the top of the review, not the appropriate anchor

Updates: Status: Incomplete Comment #2 on issue 938 by trowbrds: Hyperlinks to code locations in the reviews do not function. Take you to the top of the review, not the appropriate anchor http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=938 (No comment was entered for this

Issue 958 in reviewboard: Changes to Testing Done section lost when navigating between Diff and Review views

Updates: Status: Incomplete Comment #5 on issue 958 by trowbrds: Changes to Testing Done section lost when navigating between Diff and Review views http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=958 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because

Issue 957 in reviewboard: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 3: ordinal not in range(128)

Updates: Status: ThirdParty Comment #5 on issue 957 by trowbrds: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 3: ordinal not in range(128) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=957 I think the only real solution we have is to fix files with

Issue 1007 in reviewboard: post-review.py dies on really huge diffs.

Updates: Status: ThirdParty Comment #3 on issue 1007 by trowbrds: post-review.py dies on really huge diffs. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1007 The mysql connection can only handle about a megabyte at a time. I don't think there's anything we can do about this