Re: What is best approach for setup with multiport, multiproject perforce repository

2010-02-02 Thread Onkar
On Feb 2, 12:10 pm, Paul Scott psc...@vmware.com wrote: Onkar, We have a Review Board server that has reviews for 15 or so of our repositories (mostly Perforce, a couple SVN, and likely soon a couple Git servers once Git support makes it into a GA release). It works quite well for us, and

Re: About Installation of RBTools (post-review)

2010-02-02 Thread JohnHenry
Hi, Christian Is that mean post-review will have to depend on easy_install? We are making reviewboard automation, so the post-review is installed on an Linux Server machine. But I have no root permission, And the python installed on Linux Server machine did not install easy_install at all. So I

Re: About Installation of RBTools (post-review)

2010-02-02 Thread Christian Hammond
easy_install is part of the Python Setuptools, which we very much require. Setuptools is currently the main standard in Python packaging, and you'll need it one way or another for installation. You should be able to download it and install it in a custom PYTHONHOME, though. Christian --

VHDL Syntax highlighting

2010-02-02 Thread daniel.j.la...@googlemail.com
All, I am running ReviewBoard 1.0.5.1 and am trying to review VHDL code. It does not seem to have any syntax highlighting. I though that the syntax highlighting was provided by Pygments which seems to suggest that it does support VHDL highlighting (.vhd) Am I correct in the use of Pygments and is

Re: About Installation of RBTools (post-review)

2010-02-02 Thread Jan Koprowski
Hi John! Today I also made reviewboard install without root privileges. I made this compiling my own Python 2.5.5 to my home directory. Then I install easy_install for this private Python and all dependencies. This i my solution and until now works fine. Greetings from Poland! -- Jan Koprowski

Re: Post review with combination of binary + txt file does not work

2010-02-02 Thread Kunjal
Any info. on this one? Thanks ! On Jan 26, 6:50 pm, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Chris, With RB 1.0.5.1, when someone post the review with 1 binary file + 1 txt file, RB should filter out the binary file but txt file should be able to get reviewed in RB. We are getting

Re: ReviewBoard Error while posting review for GIT

2010-02-02 Thread Kunjal
If i try with REVIEWBOARD_URL = 'None' (Below is the debug output) It looks like the URL is correct now. But I am still getting error. mob-rb-test{kaparikh}22: postreview.py -d svn info git rev-parse --git-dir git svn info git svn --version git config --get svn-remote.svn.url git remote

Re: Post review with combination of binary + txt file does not work

2010-02-02 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, Sorry, missed the previous e-mail. On Perforce, we actually use 'diff' itself to determine if it's a binary file. We do this by running diff on the old file and the new modified file. If it tells us that it's a binary file, then we mark it as such, but otherwise we treat it as a plain text

Re: ReviewBoard Error while posting review for GIT

2010-02-02 Thread Christian Hammond
Hmm okay, well at least it's talking to the server now. If you check your server log file, you should be able to see some exception information that says what's generated that 500 error. If not, then temporarily setting DEBUG = True in your site's conf/settings_local.py will display that exception

Re: About Installation of RBTools (post-review)

2010-02-02 Thread JohnHenry
Thanks, I know now. Regards! On Feb 3, 4:28 am, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com wrote: Hi John! Today I also made reviewboard install without root privileges. I made this compiling my own Python 2.5.5 to my home directory. Then I install easy_install for this private Python and all