t: Re: fields_changed in changedescs_changedescription
Christian Hammond wrote:
> We've done a little bit of testing with the server at VMware. There
> seems to be a mix. We've had people try to dump ~1MB log files in for
> Description and for Testing Done. Our Review Board admins th
Thanks for the information on your server.
I agree that 1MB seems excessive, but it does make sense given the results
of test cases or tools that people may want to show. Attachment support
should help here. That is planned for 1.2. I'd see about 1.1, but I really
want to get this release out soon
Christian Hammond wrote:
> We've done a little bit of testing with the server at VMware. There
> seems to be a mix. We've had people try to dump ~1MB log files in for
> Description and for Testing Done. Our Review Board admins there are
> beating people over the head now to stop doing that, but
We've done a little bit of testing with the server at VMware. There seems to
be a mix. We've had people try to dump ~1MB log files in for Description and
for Testing Done. Our Review Board admins there are beating people over the
head now to stop doing that, but given that we're seeing even that us
Christian Hammond wrote:
> I don't know off-hand what we're going to set it to. We're thinking
> about it, and suggestions are welcome. Here's where it gets tricky...
> We're running up to maximum field lengths for the change info, and
> that's a combination of multiple fields, including Descrip
I think we'd get killed if we made it as small as 80 chars ;)
I don't know off-hand what we're going to set it to. We're thinking about
it, and suggestions are welcome. Here's where it gets tricky... We're
running up to maximum field lengths for the change info, and that's a
combination of multipl
Out of curiosity what size limit is this likely to be? 80 chars, 1024,
1Mb, 1Gb... :-)
Chris
Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Ronak,
>
> We will be limiting the lengths of these fields in a future version.
> We're aware of the problem and have encountered this with some users
> too. Expect a fiel
Hi Ronak,
We will be limiting the lengths of these fields in a future version. We're
aware of the problem and have encountered this with some users too. Expect a
field restriction in 1.0.6.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, In