Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

Hi, I have done reviewboard installation for my team and I have documented it here. http://technical-nonsense.blogspot.in/search/label/REVIEWBOARD%20INSTALLATION%20IN%20WINDOWS I am hoping that it might be useful. I have installed it on a 32 bit windows. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Robert Burkhall wrote: > > 0 > > > I found a workaround of the above issue that relates to Windows > Installations. > > 1) CD {install > path}\reviewboard-1.7.9-0\apps\reviewboard\Lib\site-packages > 2) Verify that Revi

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

0 I found a workaround of the above issue that relates to Windows Installations. 1) CD {install path}\reviewboard-1.7.9-0\apps\reviewboard\Lib\site-packages 2) Verify that ReviewBoard-1.7.9-py2.7.egg & ReviewBoard-1.7.11-py2.7.egg exists 3) Renam

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

And let me clarify the the resolved issue: python-ldap. Installed and everything is good. On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 11:11:10 AM UTC-4, Robert Burkhall wrote: > > Hi Victoria, > > The issue has been resolved with the release of 1.7.9.11, however I get > the following message after following the

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

Hi Victoria, The issue has been resolved with the release of 1.7.9.11, however I get the following message after following the upgrade instructions. Manual server updates required A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made on this server. After these changes are made, you should rest

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

Hi Robert, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Robert Burkhall wrote: > Hi Victoria, > > I like the the Reviewboard stack that's been created and it's only missing > the python-ldap. However, I've seen a strange issue with IE that is not > apparent in Firefox or Chrome. Has only else reported any

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

Hi Warren, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Warren Postma wrote: > > What is the nature of the problems on Windows? Is Mercurial one of the > problematic areas? The docs say it's not supported, but don't give real > details. My understanding is that the main problem was the different configura

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

Hi Victoria, I like the the Reviewboard stack that's been created and it's only missing the python-ldap. However, I've seen a strange issue with IE that is not apparent in Firefox or Chrome. Has only else reported any issue using the stack with IE9 in our case? On Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

What is the nature of the problems on Windows? Is Mercurial one of the problematic areas? The docs say it's not supported, but don't give real details. I reported this issue to bitnami, not sure if it's a windows issue, or a mercurial + reviewboard issue: http://answers.bitnami.com/question

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

I have found a fairly severe problem. Reported here: http://answers.bitnami.com/questions/14009/bitnami-reviewboard-version-17x-for-windows-the-file-was-not-found-in-the-repository-207 Warren On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 4:19:58 PM UTC-5, victoria wrote: > > Hi, > > As I already mentioned in th

Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard

Congrats on the release, Victoria! This is a great way for Windows admins to get a feel for Review Board before deploying it in production. As Victoria said, if you're planning a production install, it's recommended that you use a Linux system, due to compatibility and performance reasons. As som