Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released

2009-09-18 Thread Christian Hammond
In theory, doing: rb-site manage /path/to/site evolve -- --hint --execute should do the trick. I'd back up the database first though, just to be safe. But it should be fine. Or you could just use the alphas of 1.1 when they're out (probably this weekend). :) Christian -- Christian Hammond

Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released

2009-09-17 Thread Dan Savilonis
Yes, I realized this after I posted. I had accidentally pulled in a nightly build at one point due to my .pydistutils.cfg, but I had since downgraded to 1.0.1. Is there any way to get rid of the issue, or am I stuck with the warning forever? :) Dan On Sep 17, 3:44 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: >

Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released

2009-09-17 Thread ciaomary
Yes, that was it. Thanks! On Sep 17, 12:51 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > It sounds like that server is, for whatever reason, set up to pull from the > nightlies tree. Do you have a ~/.pydistutils.cfg file that links to the > nightlies downloads page? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - c

Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released

2009-09-17 Thread Christian Hammond
It sounds like that server is, for whatever reason, set up to pull from the nightlies tree. Do you have a ~/.pydistutils.cfg file that links to the nightlies downloads page? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.

Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released

2009-09-17 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Dan, Were you at any point running a 1.1 nightly or out of a Git tree? This is a field introduced in the 1.1 branch, so I don't know why you would see this in 1.0.x. It doesn't appear that the 1.0.x releases mention this at all in the codebase. If you went from a 1.1 to a 1.0.3, then you would

Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released

2009-09-17 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Jim, I noticed this. Looks like something changed in the new admin stylesheets that break in some setups. I'm looking into it. Guess maybe another release may be coming. *sigh*. Think maybe I'll make this a 1.0.3.1 to save some face. Glad things are working for you again! Thanks for letting us

Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released

2009-09-17 Thread Jim Priest
On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been bitten > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let us > know how it works. 1.0.3 seems to working here - no more 500 errors! The CSS in parts of the

Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released

2009-09-17 Thread ciaomary
To upgrade, I ran 'easy_install -U ReviewBoard' (as the documentation suggests) and it upgraded me to ReviewBoard 1.1 alpha-dev. I would have expected this to just pull down the latest released version, 1.0.3. On Sep 17, 8:52 am, Dan Savilonis wrote: > I got the following error during the evolu

Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released

2009-09-17 Thread Dan Savilonis
I got the following error during the evolution: # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. Project signature has changed - an evolution is required /usr/lib/python2.5/site-package