On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 19:51 -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2014, at 15:15, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>
> > No progress has been made on that, I'm afraid. It's a bigger undertaking
> > than it seems and I've frankly been swamped with other work
> > (particularly the Fedora 21 rel
On Oct 28, 2014, at 15:15, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> No progress has been made on that, I'm afraid. It's a bigger undertaking
> than it seems and I've frankly been swamped with other work
> (particularly the Fedora 21 release). I'd love to have someone help with
> this…
I don’t know what kind o
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 13:48 -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> Stephen:
>
> > Review Board 2.0.11 packages for Fedora 21 and EPEL 7 are now on their
> > way to their respective testing repositories.
>
> Any update on Review Board 2.X packages for RHEL 6? I know that you were
> working on it a f
Stephen:
> Review Board 2.0.11 packages for Fedora 21 and EPEL 7 are now on their
> way to their respective testing repositories.
Any update on Review Board 2.X packages for RHEL 6? I know that you were
working on it a few months ago.
Alfred
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.re
On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 20:22 -0700, christ...@beanbaginc.com wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We just put out a new release of Review Board.
>
> 2.0.11 fixes some upgrade issues that have been encountered for some
> MySQL users. It also improves the Change field for Perforce users, and
> fixes a cras
Hey everyone,
We just put out a new release of Review Board.
2.0.11 fixes some upgrade issues that have been encountered for some MySQL
users. It also improves the Change field for Perforce users, and fixes a crash
related to invalid timezones.
See https://www.reviewboard.org/news/2014/10/27/r