Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2803#issuecomment-59161674
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/382/consoleFull)
for PR 2803 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2667#discussion_r18875997
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RankingMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2667#discussion_r18876000
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RankingMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2667#discussion_r18875991
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RankingMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2667#discussion_r18875998
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RankingMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2667#discussion_r18875996
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RankingMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2667#discussion_r18875995
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RankingMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2667#discussion_r18875993
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RankingMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2667#discussion_r18875990
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RankingMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2667#discussion_r18876002
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RankingMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2667#discussion_r18876004
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RankingMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2667#discussion_r18876036
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RankingMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2803#discussion_r18876515
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -50,7 +50,11 @@ object MimaExcludes {
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2784#issuecomment-59163637
Thanks, LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2784#issuecomment-59163981
Minor: Your PR title looks misleading ! :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user Shiti opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2810
[SPARK-3944][Core] Code re-factored as suggested
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/Shiti/spark master
Alternatively you can review
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2810#issuecomment-59164110
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user viper-kun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2471#issuecomment-59164199
@vanzin , is it ok to go?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2701#issuecomment-59165099
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2701#issuecomment-59165094
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21762/consoleFull)
for PR 2701 at commit
Github user gvramana commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#discussion_r18877380
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/hiveUdfs.scala
---
@@ -159,7 +162,10 @@ private[hive] case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2803#issuecomment-59166771
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/382/consoleFull)
for PR 2803 at commit
GitHub user surq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2811
promote the speed of convert files to RDDS
about convert files to RDDS there are 3 loops with files sequence in spark
source.
loops files sequence:
1ãfiles.map(...)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2811#issuecomment-59167172
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gvramana commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#discussion_r18877950
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveInspectors.scala ---
@@ -186,6 +230,51 @@ private[hive] trait HiveInspectors {
Github user gvramana commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2762#issuecomment-59168016
unfortunately :( I also have worked and implemented the same as part of
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2802
Anyways I will rework on my pull request for
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2805#issuecomment-59174952
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21763/consoleFull)
for PR 2805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2805#issuecomment-59175385
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2805#issuecomment-59175382
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21763/consoleFull)
for PR 2805 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2811#discussion_r18881912
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2811#issuecomment-59176947
Looks good to me about the improvement.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2811#issuecomment-59177082
Besides would you mind creating a related JIRA and change the title like
other PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user luogankun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2800#issuecomment-59183382
@liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2812
[SPARK-3939][SQL] NPE caused by SessionState.out not set in thriftserver2
There would be an NPE caused by SessionState.out not set in thriftserver2.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2812#issuecomment-59186353
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21764/consoleFull)
for PR 2812 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2812#issuecomment-59189745
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2812#issuecomment-59189741
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21764/consoleFull)
for PR 2812 at commit
Github user mattf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2471#issuecomment-59191797
Well, good luck with adding something like that to HDFS... that is not
the responsibility of filesystems.
just so we're on the same page, i'm not advocating
Github user timothysc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2126#issuecomment-59201681
I believe @tgravescs is the only committer on this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2126#issuecomment-59214378
@pwendell @mateiz Any committers that are more familiar with the mesos
stuff that could look at this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user ssjssh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2813
improve spark on yarn doc(issus 3629 on jira)
Right now running-on-yarn.md starts off with a big list of config options,
and only then tells you how to submit an app. It would be better to put that
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2813#issuecomment-59215162
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2810#issuecomment-59223588
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2814
SPARK-1209 [CORE] SparkHadoopUtil should not use package org.apache.hadoop
(This is just a look at what completely moving the classes would look like.
I know Patrick flagged that as maybe not OK,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2805#issuecomment-59226192
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21766/consoleFull)
for PR 2805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2814#issuecomment-59226216
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21765/consoleFull)
for PR 2814 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2471#issuecomment-59231360
@mattf Always in for a beer but unfortunately I'm not in NY...
Also, you mention rotating a lot. This is not rotating. This is cleaning
up, as in deleting
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2471#issuecomment-59231417
@viper-kun haven't had a chance to look at the diff again, but it seems
there are merge conflicts now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2810#issuecomment-59235424
Hi @Shiti , could you write a less cryptic PR title? This becomes the git
commit summary, so it's recommended that it describe the actual change. Thanks!
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2814#issuecomment-59237336
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2805#issuecomment-59237316
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21766/consoleFull)
for PR 2805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2805#issuecomment-59237321
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2784#issuecomment-59237464
Updated, but I think we should always give PRs a name opposite to what they
actually do. Keeps things interesting.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2784#issuecomment-59237808
above below?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2814#issuecomment-59239541
jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2814#issuecomment-59239623
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2805#issuecomment-59241056
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21769/consoleFull)
for PR 2805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2814#issuecomment-59241716
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2814#issuecomment-59241697
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21765/consoleFull)
for PR 2814 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2746#discussion_r18908858
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,496 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18908910
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -83,216 +79,163 @@ object SparkSubmit {
* (4) the main class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18909075
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -33,30 +34,25 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
* a layer over the
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18909183
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -83,216 +79,163 @@ object SparkSubmit {
* (4) the main class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18909253
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -83,216 +79,163 @@ object SparkSubmit {
* (4) the main class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18909359
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -83,216 +79,163 @@ object SparkSubmit {
* (4) the main class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18909554
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -83,216 +79,163 @@ object SparkSubmit {
* (4) the main class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18909952
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -83,216 +79,163 @@ object SparkSubmit {
* (4) the main class
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18910093
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -397,9 +347,9 @@ object SparkSubmit {
* Provides an indirection layer for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2814#issuecomment-59246755
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18910401
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -17,201 +17,286 @@
package org.apache.spark.deploy
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18910527
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -17,201 +17,286 @@
package org.apache.spark.deploy
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18910722
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -17,201 +17,286 @@
package org.apache.spark.deploy
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18911158
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -227,91 +312,92 @@ private[spark] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18911121
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -17,201 +17,286 @@
package org.apache.spark.deploy
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18911187
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -227,91 +312,92 @@ private[spark] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18911284
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -227,91 +312,92 @@ private[spark] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18911428
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -398,22 +478,117 @@ private[spark] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18911516
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -398,22 +478,117 @@ private[spark] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18911832
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -398,22 +478,117 @@ private[spark] class SparkSubmitArguments(args:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18911938
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitDriverBootstrapper.scala
---
@@ -50,71 +51,69 @@ private[spark] object
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18911947
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitDriverBootstrapper.scala
---
@@ -50,71 +51,69 @@ private[spark] object
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18911964
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitDriverBootstrapper.scala
---
@@ -50,71 +51,69 @@ private[spark] object
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#discussion_r18912066
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1479,6 +1479,14 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#issuecomment-59251504
@tigerquoll you'll need to merge this with current master, since there are
conflicts. You may be able to clean up some code since the PR I mentioned
before is now checked
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2805#issuecomment-59251747
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21769/consoleFull)
for PR 2805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2805#issuecomment-59251760
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2746#discussion_r18912692
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,496 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
GitHub user jegonzal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2815
Remove Bytecode Inspection for Join Elimination
Removing bytecode inspection from triplet operations and introducing
explicit join elimination flags. The explicit flags make the join elimination
Github user jegonzal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2815#issuecomment-59263992
@ankurdave and @rxin I have not updated the applications to use the new
explicit flags. I will do that in this PR pending approval for the API changes.
---
If your
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2497#issuecomment-59265338
Friendly ping.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user Ishiihara commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2815#discussion_r18917918
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/Graph.scala ---
@@ -195,6 +195,12 @@ abstract class Graph[VD: ClassTag, ED: ClassTag]
protected ()
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2815#issuecomment-59265527
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21771/consoleFull)
for PR 2815 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2815#issuecomment-59265670
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21771/consoleFull)
for PR 2815 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2815#issuecomment-59265673
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2701#issuecomment-59266259
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21772/consoleFull)
for PR 2701 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2815#issuecomment-59266720
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2812#issuecomment-59270336
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2812#issuecomment-59271430
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/21773/consoleFull)
for PR 2812 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2746#discussion_r18920574
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,496 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2746#discussion_r18920718
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,496 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
