Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5715#discussion_r29126734
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveContext.scala ---
@@ -81,11 +81,38 @@ class HiveContext(sc: SparkContext) extends
Github user tsudukim commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5227#discussion_r29132469
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/CommandBuilderUtils.java ---
@@ -260,15 +260,14 @@ static String quoteForBatchScript(String arg)
Github user selvinsource commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3062#issuecomment-96516889
@mengxr for SVM, I manually tried what you suggested and it looks good.
I loaded the example below in JPMML and evaluated it as Classification map,
indeed
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5712#issuecomment-96516809
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mag- commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/468#issuecomment-96587264
Are you aware that all this regexp hacks will break when hadoop changes
version to 3.0.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717#issuecomment-96597976
[Test build #30964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30964/consoleFull)
for PR 5717 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4723#issuecomment-96580759
Hi @davies and @tdas , I met a problem of converting Python `int` into Java
`Long`, the Java API in KafkaUtils requires offset as `Long` type, this is
simple for
GitHub user yang0228 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5718
Add filter by location boundingbox in TwitterInputDStream.scala
Current TwitterInputDStream only filters by keywords.
Need a filtering by location feature.
You can merge this pull request into
Github user tsudukim commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5227#issuecomment-96598393
The problem I mentioned was that the spark-shell.cmd which is called by
`SparkLauncherSuite` somehow failed to launch test application.
It turned out to be caused by
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/468#issuecomment-96611185
@mag- if you're talking about what I think you are, it was a temporary
thing that's long since gone already
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/629/files
---
If your
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5717
[SPARK-7165] [SQL] use sort merge join for outer join
This is an extended version of #5208
In this patch, we are introducing sort merge join for not only inner joins,
but left outer/ right
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5715#issuecomment-96597552
[Test build #30962 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30962/consoleFull)
for PR 5715 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5716#issuecomment-96597549
[Test build #30961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30961/consoleFull)
for PR 5716 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5716#issuecomment-96613653
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5673#issuecomment-96792683
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5723#issuecomment-96798651
[Test build #31067 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31067/consoleFull)
for PR 5723 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5377#discussion_r29190170
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SaslEncryption.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user His-name-is-Joof commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5667#issuecomment-96819726
Joof
On Apr 27, 2015 2:41 PM, Shivaram Venkataraman notificati...@github.com
wrote:
@His-name-is-Joof https://github.com/His-name-is-Joof --
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#issuecomment-96819919
@harishreedharan , fyi - we are doing a feature code freeze for spark 1.4
this friday. I think this is really close so hopefully we can get it in. Let
me know if
Github user punya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5726#issuecomment-96794273
@srowen I'm sure it will :) I was using the PR to get Jenkins to figure out
what tests actually break. At that point, I'll add [WIP] to the title and see
if I can fix the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5699#issuecomment-96797201
[Test build #30972 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30972/consoleFull)
for PR 5699 at commit
Github user punya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5726
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-96800849
[Test build #31061 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31061/consoleFull)
for PR 4783 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5098#issuecomment-96804955
[Test build #31049 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31049/consoleFull)
for PR 5098 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5727#issuecomment-96813165
[Test build #722 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/722/consoleFull)
for PR 5727 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5667#issuecomment-96813694
@His-name-is-Joof -- Could you let me know what your JIRA username is ? I
would like to assign this issue to your
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5669#issuecomment-96816164
After discussing with @mengxr I think we should not bother with the
try-finally wrapper. As mentioned above, the method should generally not fail,
so the data will be
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5727#issuecomment-96816185
[Test build #31068 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31068/consoleFull)
for PR 5727 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5568#issuecomment-96816065
Thanks @concretevitamin for the review. Will merge this after Jenkins passes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4450#discussion_r29190908
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/ChainedBuffer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5673#issuecomment-96828599
[Test build #31066 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31066/consoleFull)
for PR 5673 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5673
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5726#issuecomment-96791158
... I doubt this passes tests. The problem is that you break compatibility
with old versions of Hive; it's not this simple.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5726#issuecomment-96794694
[Test build #31064 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31064/consoleFull)
for PR 5726 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5396#issuecomment-96797161
[Test build #31024 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31024/consoleFull)
for PR 5396 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5667#issuecomment-96800371
[Test build #31060 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31060/consoleFull)
for PR 5667 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5442#issuecomment-96811042
**[Test build #31015 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31015/consoleFull)**
for PR 5442 at commit
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5727
[Build] Enable MiMa checks for launcher and sql projects
Now that 1.3 has been released, we should enable MiMa checks for the `sql`
and `launcher` subprojects.
You can merge this pull request
Github user dwmclary commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4774#issuecomment-96816965
@jegonzal does this algorithm look correct to you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5589#issuecomment-96819141
[Test build #30999 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30999/consoleFull)
for PR 5589 at commit
Github user doctapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3074#issuecomment-96791733
@hellertime thanks for the info, didn't catch this wasn't pre-installed
with mesos.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5377#discussion_r29188459
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SaslEncryption.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5667
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5727#issuecomment-96813311
[Test build #31068 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31068/consoleFull)
for PR 5727 at commit
Github user concretevitamin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5568#issuecomment-96814334
LGTM. /cc @shivaram
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5725#issuecomment-96814367
[Test build #31069 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31069/consoleFull)
for PR 5725 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5377#discussion_r29190765
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SparkSaslServer.java
---
@@ -60,13 +60,19 @@
static final String DIGEST =
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#issuecomment-96824485
I am testing the changes right now. I will update this PR soon. Thanks
@tgravescs!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4450#discussion_r29192947
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/WritablePartitionedPairCollection.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5694#issuecomment-96828951
[Test build #31071 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31071/consoleFull)
for PR 5694 at commit
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5377#discussion_r29195262
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SaslEncryption.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5647#issuecomment-96792936
[Test build #30986 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30986/consoleFull)
for PR 5647 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5673#issuecomment-96792973
[Test build #31066 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31066/consoleFull)
for PR 5673 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5422#issuecomment-96801888
[Test build #31021 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31021/consoleFull)
for PR 5422 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5695#issuecomment-96808771
@huitseeker Yes, I want to use the existing rate limiter interface. So that
any sort of rate controlling in the future can be applied through that
interface.
---
If your
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5377#discussion_r29189853
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/SaslEncryption.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5727#issuecomment-96816752
It looks like SQL failed 11 MiMa checks, although it looks like all of them
are in test code or internal APIs (so we can just double-check, then add the
proper
Github user jimfcarroll commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5669#issuecomment-96816661
Your project. I'll downgrade it if you want. :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user helena commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#discussion_r29194115
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/rdd/WriteAheadLogBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -96,9 +99,27 @@ class
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5568#issuecomment-96830292
Hmm this is weird - somehow the test results for this PR were never posted
to github.
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5616#discussion_r29195806
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/mathfunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3074#issuecomment-96795918
[Test build #721 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/721/consoleFull)
for PR 3074 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#issuecomment-96795847
[Test build #30990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30990/consoleFull)
for PR 5636 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4435#discussion_r29190417
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/api.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user punya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5726#issuecomment-96796911
Closing in favor of work on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6906.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5005#issuecomment-96807849
**[Test build #31054 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31054/consoleFull)**
for PR 5005 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-96815195
Thanks @advancedxy for fixing the tests. This change LGTM. @rxin @srowen
Could you also take a final look at this ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5727#issuecomment-96817556
Ah, `launcher` was only added in 1.4, so I'll put the MiMa exclude back.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4450#discussion_r29191148
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/ExternalSorter.scala ---
@@ -740,15 +723,29 @@ private[spark] class ExternalSorter[K, V, C](
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5720#issuecomment-96826279
[Test build #31063 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31063/consoleFull)
for PR 5720 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5673#issuecomment-96829768
Thanks. Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4435#discussion_r29183894
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/TaskSorting.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+package org.apache.spark.status.api.v1;/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5685#issuecomment-96796263
[Test build #30977 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30977/consoleFull)
for PR 5685 at commit
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4450#discussion_r29191682
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/PartitionedSerializedPairBuffer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,254 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5473#issuecomment-96827274
[Test build #31070 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31070/consoleFull)
for PR 5473 at commit
Github user helena commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5645#discussion_r29194436
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/rdd/WriteAheadLogBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -96,9 +99,27 @@ class
Github user mohitjaggi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2429#issuecomment-96791360
closing on sean's request. i have a workaround.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user mohitjaggi closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2429
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5637#issuecomment-96796679
[Test build #30989 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30989/consoleFull)
for PR 5637 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5667#issuecomment-96820582
@srowen Could you add Joof as a contributor on our JIRA ? The assignee
auto-complete doesn't seem to pick this up right now
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4450#discussion_r29193245
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/WritablePartitionedPairCollection.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user brennonyork commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5694#issuecomment-96827964
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5723#issuecomment-96829203
[Test build #31067 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31067/consoleFull)
for PR 5723 at commit
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#issuecomment-96516549
@liancheng @marmbrus Any more comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user rayortigas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5713
[SPARK-7160][SQL] Support converting DataFrames to typed RDDs.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7160
https://github.com/databricks/spark-csv/pull/52
cc:
@rxin (who
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5714#issuecomment-96552127
[Test build #30963 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30963/consoleFull)
for PR 5714 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5660#issuecomment-96515766
Thanks for working on this! I'm merging this to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4015#issuecomment-96516483
@liancheng @rxin @marmbrus can you trigger the unit test for me?
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5715#discussion_r29126807
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveContext.scala ---
@@ -81,11 +81,38 @@ class HiveContext(sc: SparkContext) extends
Github user rtreffer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/#issuecomment-96573899
@marmbrus what should we do now? New PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user twinkle-sachdeva closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4845
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user yongtang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5708#issuecomment-96524002
@srowen Thanks for the comment. I updated the pull request so that
setInputPaths instead of addInputPaths are used. In addition to
newAPIHadoopFile(), the instances of
Github user selvinsource commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3062#issuecomment-96544425
For binary logistic regression, using the same principle (intercept as
threshold), doing some maths, we could set:
`intercept = -ln(1/threshold - 1)`
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5715#issuecomment-96552130
[Test build #30962 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30962/consoleFull)
for PR 5715 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5716#issuecomment-96552117
[Test build #30961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30961/consoleFull)
for PR 5716 at commit
Github user twinkle-sachdeva commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5449#issuecomment-96515946
Hi @srowen ,
Please review the changes.
Thanks,
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4015#issuecomment-96516744
I think Jenkins is having some trouble right now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4015#issuecomment-96516751
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5660
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user LuqmanSahaf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/468#issuecomment-96522017
@darose I am facing the VerifyError you mentioned in one of the comments.
Can you tell me how you solved that error?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
1 - 100 of 713 matches
Mail list logo
