Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9642#issuecomment-157147813
The original behavior of these classes was to throw if you tried to
retrieve a null primitive value and I think thats a lot less confusing.
Unfortunately it seems that
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9437#issuecomment-157147732
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9684#issuecomment-157147767
Merging to master / 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9742
[SPARK-9065][Streaming][PySpark] Add MessageHandler for Kafka Python API
Fixed the merge conflicts in #7410
Closes #7410
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9652#discussion_r44971819
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1393,4 +1401,58 @@ class JsonSuite extends Quer
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157147189
**[Test build #46003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46003/consoleFull)**
for PR 9741 at commit
[`8f583b9`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9613#issuecomment-157145793
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7410#issuecomment-157145854
@jerryshao sorry for so much delays on this PR. We needed to fix issues
like #9669 before merging python streaming features. Hence the delay. Would you
mind if we take over
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9613#issuecomment-157145795
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9613#issuecomment-157145644
**[Test build #46002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46002/consoleFull)**
for PR 9613 at commit
[`05bb4aa`](https://git
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9186
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9695
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9186#issuecomment-157142357
Thanks @djalova and @zsxwing for your efforts. Merging this to master and
1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9695#issuecomment-157141926
LGTM. Merging this to master and 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157141615
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157141612
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157141605
**[Test build #46001 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46001/consoleFull)**
for PR 9741 at commit
[`bc40285`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157140927
**[Test build #46001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46001/consoleFull)**
for PR 9741 at commit
[`bc40285`](https://gith
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9705#issuecomment-157140840
LGTM. cc @yhuai for another pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9613#issuecomment-157140688
**[Test build #46002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46002/consoleFull)**
for PR 9613 at commit
[`05bb4aa`](https://gith
Github user choochootrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#discussion_r44967864
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TestUtils.scala ---
@@ -78,15 +79,15 @@ private[spark] object TestUtils {
}
/**
-
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9496#issuecomment-157138979
@cloud-fan Would you mind to have a look at this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user gssiyankai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9661#issuecomment-157138785
@davies,
I've worked on the issue SPARK-11016.
The fix is available in this PR: https://github.com/yaooqinn/spark/pull/1
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user choochootrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#discussion_r44967313
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetterSuite.scala ---
@@ -119,5 +124,47 @@ class TaskResultGetterSuite extends SparkF
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9060#issuecomment-157138358
Merging to branch-1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157138122
@tdas @zsxwing
Please take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user tedyu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
GitHub user tedyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741
Prevent the call to StreamingContext#stop() in the listener bus's thread
See discussion toward the tail of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723
You can merge this pull request into a Git reposit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9661#issuecomment-157136868
SGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9740#discussion_r44966303
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/HiveThriftServer2Suites.scala
---
@@ -635,6 +683,7 @@ abstract class Hiv
Github user choochootrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#discussion_r44965129
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TestUtils.scala ---
@@ -130,7 +131,7 @@ private[spark] object TestUtils {
val fileName = classNam
Github user choochootrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#discussion_r44965069
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetterSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,8 +17,13 @@
package org.apache.spark.schedule
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9740#issuecomment-157134508
Yeah, I'll add it to the programming guide.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9740#discussion_r44964862
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/HiveThriftServer2Suites.scala
---
@@ -635,6 +683,7 @@ abstract class
Github user choochootrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#discussion_r44964392
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetterSuite.scala ---
@@ -119,5 +124,47 @@ class TaskResultGetterSuite extends SparkF
Github user choochootrain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9367#discussion_r44964408
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetterSuite.scala ---
@@ -119,5 +124,47 @@ class TaskResultGetterSuite extends SparkF
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-157131325
@yhuai Many thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user pravingadakh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9522#issuecomment-157131275
@jkbradley Any updates on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9720#discussion_r44963028
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -280,6 +280,12 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6263#issuecomment-157128907
@archit279thakur yeah don't worry about that test failure ... when you push
updates & bring up to date w/ master the tests will re-run in any case
---
If your project is
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9272#issuecomment-157128630
Also merged to branch-1.5.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6263#discussion_r44961686
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/StorageStatusListener.scala ---
@@ -87,6 +113,8 @@ class StorageStatusListener extends SparkListener {
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9740#issuecomment-157128229
@liancheng This option is only for backward compatibility purpose, could we
document it somewhere? We should also mention this change (isolated sessions)
in release note.
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9740#issuecomment-157127825
@liancheng I like the this approach more, all global configurations should
be placed in SparkConf (could be override in current session)
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6263#discussion_r44961121
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/StorageStatusListener.scala ---
@@ -28,15 +35,34 @@ import org.apache.spark.scheduler._
*
*
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6263#discussion_r44960862
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/exec/ExecutorsPage.scala
---
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ import scala.xml.Node
import org.apache.spark.status.api.
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9740#discussion_r44960873
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/HiveThriftServer2Suites.scala
---
@@ -635,6 +683,7 @@ abstract class Hiv
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9661#issuecomment-157125514
@yaooqinn This PR looks good to me overall. Since your patch basically
revert #9243, I'd like to revert that first, then rebase this pr, to make the
history more clear. W
Github user zsxwing closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6841
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6841#issuecomment-157124033
I'm closing this one. We can reopen it if we want to do it in 1.7.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9740#issuecomment-157122865
**[Test build #46000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46000/consoleFull)**
for PR 9740 at commit
[`eeeb194`](https://gith
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723#issuecomment-157122774
> Sounds like we should prevent the call to StreamingContext#stop() in the
listener bus's thread.
> How about setting a ThreadLocal Boolean to indicate to StreamingCo
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9740#issuecomment-157121925
Another approach for this problem is to have "global" options. For example,
`SET -g key=value` sets `key` to `value` for all sessions. This adds a new
concept and requ
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9661#discussion_r44958484
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -173,18 +172,15 @@ private[spark] object HighlyCompressedMapStatus {
va
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9661#discussion_r44958298
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializer.scala ---
@@ -21,24 +21,24 @@ import java.io.{EOFException, IOException, InputStream,
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9740
[SPARK-11089] [SQL] Adds option for disabling multi-session in Thrift server
This PR adds a new option `spark.sql.hive.thriftServer.singleSession` for
disabling multi-session support in the Thrift
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9721#issuecomment-157116639
LGTM (although you could probably have a single flag for both).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9739#issuecomment-157116741
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9619#issuecomment-157116469
**[Test build #45999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45999/consoleFull)**
for PR 9619 at commit
[`180456c`](https://gith
GitHub user jbonofre opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9739
SPARK-11716 - UDFRegistration just drops the input type when re-creatâ¦
â¦ing the UserDefinedFunction
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://git
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9619#issuecomment-157111920
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9060#issuecomment-157108064
Sure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9658#issuecomment-157106033
We've added support for reading these types as strings, but we can't round
trip data without losing the annotation which might be kind of confusing for
users. Perhaps
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9732#discussion_r44952987
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1054,6 +1054,10 @@ setGeneric("year", function(x) {
standardGeneric("year") })
#' @export
setGeneric("glm")
Github user jbonofre closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9738
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9738#issuecomment-157102150
A fix has already been applied.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9738#issuecomment-157100489
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9736#issuecomment-157099967
**[Test build #45998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45998/consoleFull)**
for PR 9736 at commit
[`253235a`](https://gith
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9712
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9728
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user jbonofre opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9738
SPARK-11760 - Fix getSeconds() to use the timezone
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbonofre/spark SPARK-11760
Alternatively yo
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9712#issuecomment-157098726
LGTM, merging this into master and 1.6 branch, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9728#issuecomment-157097729
Merged into master, 1.6 and 1.5 branch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9712#discussion_r44949708
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/RowEncoderSuite.scala
---
@@ -68,7 +117,36 @@ class RowEncoderSuite extends Spark
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8934#issuecomment-157095257
@viirya This PR only help a two corner cases, and they are not blocker
(could be easily workaround), I'd like to not fix these (avoid the complexity).
If we merge this on
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9652#discussion_r44945464
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1393,4 +1401,58 @@ class JsonSuite extends QueryT
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9737#issuecomment-157084858
**[Test build #45997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45997/consoleFull)**
for PR 9737 at commit
[`1cb40df`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9737#issuecomment-157085080
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9737#issuecomment-157085084
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9652#discussion_r44942818
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1393,4 +1401,58 @@ class JsonSuite extends QueryT
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9652#discussion_r44942723
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1393,4 +1401,58 @@ class JsonSuite extends QueryT
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-157083196
@xwu0226
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45977/consoleFull
is good. I will merge it to master and branch 1.6.
---
If your project is s
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9652#discussion_r44942380
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -814,8 +821,18 @@ private[sql] object HadoopFsRelation extends Loggin
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9731#issuecomment-157079364
**[Test build #2064 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2064/consoleFull)**
for PR 9731 at commit
[`0828753`](https://gi
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9652#discussion_r44942050
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -440,9 +441,15 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](maybe
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9542#issuecomment-157075099
@yhuai The last test build passed. Do you know what might cause the
previous errors? After resolving the conflicts, my own diff for this PR is
still the same place, that
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9712#issuecomment-157062181
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9712#issuecomment-157062183
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9712#issuecomment-157061992
**[Test build #45994 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45994/consoleFull)**
for PR 9712 at commit
[`a5fdbce`](https://git
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9735#issuecomment-157041394
Hi @somideshmukh, thanks for working on this. You can use the PR
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9713 as an example. What we need to do is
replacing all raw code s
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9366#discussion_r44926444
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -33,6 +34,31 @@ private[sql] object StatFunctions extends Lo
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9735#discussion_r44926012
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -53,7 +53,24 @@ Refer to the [HashingTF Java
docs](api/java/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/HashingT
Refer to the [Hash
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9737#issuecomment-157037682
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9736#issuecomment-157037907
**[Test build #2065 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2065/consoleFull)**
for PR 9736 at commit
[`e0b26c4`](https://gi
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9735#discussion_r44925725
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ In the following code segment, we start with a set of
sentences. We split each
Refer to the [Hashin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9737#issuecomment-157037680
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9737#issuecomment-157037193
**[Test build #45997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45997/consoleFull)**
for PR 9737 at commit
[`1cb40df`](https://gith
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9658
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9658#issuecomment-157034946
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
501 - 600 of 697 matches
Mail list logo
