Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9701#discussion_r45158402
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -381,8 +393,12 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
}
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157599928
DirectKafkaStreamSuite failed in maven Jenkins:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/Spark-Master-Maven-with-YARN/HADOOP_PROFILE=hadoop-2.4,label=spark-test/
Github user mccheah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9615#issuecomment-157599795
Spark-core would depend on the org.spark-project.javax.ws.rs but I would
exclude it in my app specifically, as well as anyone who would use Jersey 2.
---
If your projec
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9615#issuecomment-157599693
Your app is *one app*. This needs to work for *all apps*.
If spark-core doesn't depend on the artifact that has the javax classes,
*Spark won't work*.
---
If yo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9787#issuecomment-157599650
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9787#issuecomment-157599651
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user mccheah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9615#issuecomment-157599572
No because my app would replace org.spark-project.javax.ws.rs with its own
javax.ws.rs (which is transitively pulled in by Jersey 2 anyways), and those
newer javax.ws.rs
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9787#issuecomment-157599608
**[Test build #46157 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46157/consoleFull)**
for PR 9787 at commit
[`9c3bd92`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9790#issuecomment-157599524
**[Test build #46163 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46163/consoleFull)**
for PR 9790 at commit
[`7992777`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9791#issuecomment-157599346
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9791#issuecomment-157599344
**[Test build #46165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46165/consoleFull)**
for PR 9791 at commit
[`a5ba39a`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9791#issuecomment-157599347
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9615#issuecomment-157599373
But it (and spark-core) need to depend on that jar containing the javax
stuff...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9791#issuecomment-157599274
**[Test build #46165 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46165/consoleFull)**
for PR 9791 at commit
[`a5ba39a`](https://gith
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9615#issuecomment-157598997
But it also depends on spark-core, no? You said so above. And spark-core
would depend on the spark-specific jersey jar which in your list would have the
META-INF classes.
Github user mccheah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9615#issuecomment-157599094
No - spark-specific Jersey jar would not have javax.ws.rs classes. That
would be in org.spark-project.javax.ws.rs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9791
[SPARK-11804][PYSPARK] Exception raise when using Jdbc predicates optâ¦
â¦ion in PySpark
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/zjffdu/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9716#issuecomment-157598952
**[Test build #46164 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46164/consoleFull)**
for PR 9716 at commit
[`4d9cffb`](https://gith
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-157598886
Do you mean bugs in this code? Or in 1.6? If in this code, master will
eventually go through stabilization also, and at that point if there are bugs,
they'll surface. Whe
Github user mccheah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9615#issuecomment-157598877
My app would depend on Jersey 2 only which doesn't package the javax.ws.rs
in itself and doesn't have the META-INF/services/javax.ws.rs* stuff.
---
If your project is s
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9787#issuecomment-157598831
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9787#issuecomment-157598829
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9787#issuecomment-157598727
**[Test build #46141 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46141/consoleFull)**
for PR 9787 at commit
[`eb24466`](https://git
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9615#issuecomment-157598706
Steps 1 and 4 are both needed for your app, since you're embedding Spark.
Basically "org.spark-project.jersey" can't contain either javax.ws classes nor
the META-INF fil
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9790
[SPARK-11791] Fix flaky test in BatchedWriteAheadLogSuite
stack trace of failure:
```
org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedDueToTimeoutException: The code passed
to eventually never returned no
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9716#issuecomment-157598377
Fixed, sorry for the carelessness.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9706#issuecomment-157598316
ping @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9481#discussion_r45157472
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/netty/SparkTransportConf.scala ---
@@ -40,23 +40,26 @@ object SparkTransportConf {
/**
Github user mccheah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9615#issuecomment-157598153
So to recap this approach holistically, both from the perspective of my
application and from what needs to change Spark side:
1. Create "org.spark-project.jersey
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9481#discussion_r45157404
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/network/netty/SparkTransportConf.scala ---
@@ -40,23 +40,26 @@ object SparkTransportConf {
/**
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9704
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9716#issuecomment-157597885
**[Test build #46162 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46162/consoleFull)**
for PR 9716 at commit
[`2ed613a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#issuecomment-157597785
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#issuecomment-157597786
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#issuecomment-157597709
**[Test build #46159 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46159/consoleFull)**
for PR 9769 at commit
[`df9bca7`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9746#issuecomment-157597503
**[Test build #2083 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2083/consoleFull)**
for PR 9746 at commit
[`f69061d`](https://git
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9746
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9748
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-157595580
I'm mostly thinking it'd make it harder if we found bugs that need to fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9780#issuecomment-157594835
**[Test build #46161 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46161/consoleFull)**
for PR 9780 at commit
[`a645c11`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9481#issuecomment-157594757
**[Test build #46160 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46160/consoleFull)**
for PR 9481 at commit
[`523decb`](https://gith
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9615#issuecomment-157593885
Seems like the old jersey-core jar has the javax classes within it, instead
of depending on a separate artifact; so you'd need the new javax jar in front
of it in the cla
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#issuecomment-157593732
**[Test build #46159 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46159/consoleFull)**
for PR 9769 at commit
[`df9bca7`](https://gith
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9481#issuecomment-157593004
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-157591720
What's the problem with merging to master? Isn't that why we have
branch-1.6?
I have changes built on top of this that I'm waiting to send for review.
---
If yo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157590941
**[Test build #46158 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46158/consoleFull)**
for PR 9741 at commit
[`922bf0b`](https://gith
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9789#discussion_r45155505
--- Diff: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Encoder.scala ---
@@ -37,7 +38,33 @@ trait Encoder[T] extends Serializable {
def clsTag: Cl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9481#issuecomment-157590163
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9783#issuecomment-157590523
**[Test build #46155 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46155/consoleFull)**
for PR 9783 at commit
[`6a10080`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9481#issuecomment-157590160
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9788#issuecomment-157589689
I am running the test. From what I have seen so far, it fixes the problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8357#issuecomment-157589693
@pankajarora12 could you test in 1.5.1 and see if there is any performance
regression?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157589455
```
ERROR: Timeout after 15 minutes
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from
https://github.com/apache/s
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#issuecomment-157589422
@shivaram, The R raw type is intended to hold raw bytes. while int vector
is to hold 32-bit integer values. The R raw type maps to Spark SQL binary type,
which is intern
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157589468
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9787#issuecomment-157589317
**[Test build #46157 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46157/consoleFull)**
for PR 9787 at commit
[`9c3bd92`](https://gith
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9787#issuecomment-157589288
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9788#issuecomment-157589220
LGTM too (assuming it fixes the tpcds problem)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157589170
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157589171
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9788#issuecomment-157589067
**[Test build #46154 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46154/consoleFull)**
for PR 9788 at commit
[`c1a9a4f`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9789#discussion_r45155101
--- Diff: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Encoder.scala ---
@@ -37,7 +38,33 @@ trait Encoder[T] extends Serializable {
def clsTag: ClassTa
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9789#discussion_r45155036
--- Diff: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Encoder.scala ---
@@ -37,7 +38,33 @@ trait Encoder[T] extends Serializable {
def clsTag: Cl
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9481#issuecomment-157588981
**[Test build #46156 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46156/consoleFull)**
for PR 9481 at commit
[`523decb`](https://gith
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9789#discussion_r45154972
--- Diff: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Encoder.scala ---
@@ -37,7 +38,33 @@ trait Encoder[T] extends Serializable {
def clsTag: Cl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9764#issuecomment-157588711
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9764#issuecomment-157588713
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9764#issuecomment-157588637
**[Test build #46149 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46149/consoleFull)**
for PR 9764 at commit
[`90aae7f`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9784#issuecomment-157588532
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9784#issuecomment-157588531
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9787#discussion_r45154801
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -529,7 +530,12 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* For Java API, use [[collect
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9784#issuecomment-157588430
**[Test build #46133 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46133/consoleFull)**
for PR 9784 at commit
[`ae96866`](https://git
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157588328
DirectKafkaStreamSuite passed locally:
```
Run starting. Expected test count is: 6
DirectKafkaStreamSuite:
- basic stream receiving with multiple topics and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9784
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9783#issuecomment-157588362
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9602#issuecomment-157588218
**[Test build #46152 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46152/consoleFull)**
for PR 9602 at commit
[`35cd4f4`](https://gith
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9779#discussion_r45154680
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetterSuite.scala ---
@@ -119,5 +123,66 @@ class TaskResultGetterSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9784#issuecomment-157588050
I'm going to merge this and fix the comments in a separate pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9779#discussion_r45154648
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetterSuite.scala ---
@@ -119,5 +123,66 @@ class TaskResultGetterSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9779#discussion_r45154563
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetterSuite.scala ---
@@ -119,5 +123,66 @@ class TaskResultGetterSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-157587696
Alright I looked a bit closer at this. Since it is not mission critical and
it is touching some mission critical part, I think it's best to not to merge
this in 1.6.
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9787#discussion_r45154495
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -529,7 +530,12 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* For Java API, use [[co
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9785#issuecomment-157587670
ok, I see. I guess I picked the closer form
```
## S3 method for class 'data.frame'
subset(x, subset, select, drop = FALSE, ...)
```
I'll try/fix t
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9481#issuecomment-157586928
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9783#issuecomment-157586719
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9783#issuecomment-157586716
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9788#issuecomment-157586644
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9783#issuecomment-157586671
**[Test build #46131 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46131/consoleFull)**
for PR 9783 at commit
[`6a10080`](https://git
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157586672
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9788#discussion_r45154129
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashedRelation.scala
---
@@ -215,6 +217,14 @@ private[joins] final class UnsafeHash
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#issuecomment-157585916
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#issuecomment-157585922
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#issuecomment-157585897
**[Test build #46148 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46148/consoleFull)**
for PR 9769 at commit
[`07a0f33`](https://git
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9788#discussion_r45154094
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SizeEstimator.scala ---
@@ -32,6 +32,16 @@ import org.apache.spark.annotation.DeveloperApi
import o
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9784#discussion_r45154095
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -73,6 +73,17 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLContext {
Github user mccheah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9615#issuecomment-157585464
So I tried the following experiment to simulate what we want to be doing
and testing the hypothesis that it doesn't matter what order the Jersey jars
are loaded in. What
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9784#discussion_r45154097
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -73,6 +73,17 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLContext {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9788#issuecomment-157584728
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9788#issuecomment-157584736
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741#issuecomment-157585091
For both 46132 and 46136:
```
[info] StreamingListenerSuite:
[info] - batch info reporting (752 milliseconds)
[info] - receiver info reporting (369 milliseco
201 - 300 of 942 matches
Mail list logo
