Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-159991288
**[Test build #46778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46778/consoleFull)**
for PR 9979 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-159991328
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46778/consoleFull
is for hadoop 2.0 test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9995#issuecomment-159995211
**[Test build #46775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46775/consoleFull)**
for PR 9995 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9995#issuecomment-159995282
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9995#issuecomment-159995281
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996173
**[Test build #46779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46779/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159997153
**[Test build #46780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46780/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-159997959
Reynold is just claiming all the good numbers for himself.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9991#discussion_r46008320
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ class SQLListenerMemoryLeakSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-16056
**[Test build #46778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46778/consoleFull)**
for PR 9979 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8610#issuecomment-160001167
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8610#issuecomment-160001142
**[Test build #46774 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46774/consoleFull)**
for PR 8610 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8610#issuecomment-160001166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#discussion_r46005696
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/IsolatedClientLoader.scala
---
@@ -34,23 +34,54 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996339
**[Test build #46779 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46779/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#discussion_r46007594
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -401,7 +402,7 @@ class SQLContext private[sql](
*/
@Experimental
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159998497
**[Test build #46782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46782/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10009
[SPARK-12018][SQL] Refactor common subexpression elimination code
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12018
The code of common subexpression elimination can be factored and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10008#issuecomment-16899
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996648
jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996634
Added reworked design
* all metrics go through the `MetricsSystem`; the providers return an
optional `Source` from the `start()` call.
*
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-159998570
:)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-159998606
Now I gotta think hard about what I should submit using this branch when I
reopen the pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-15278
**[Test build #46777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46777/consoleFull)**
for PR 10001 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996343
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996342
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159997461
**[Test build #46781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46781/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-16264
(Note that the POMs changed to pull in some more of the codahale servlets,
though only the health checks & thread dump are being registered. Hooking up
those
Github user radekg commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608#issuecomment-16205
I've added the code for 1.6. It works (tasks are successfully finishing).
However, I am not 100% sure what is the impact of this change. Would be great
if somebody
Github user radekg commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608#issuecomment-16247
Regarding the `TorrentBroadcast`. I think there is to be some magic done
around `blockManager.port`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-159986618
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-159987537
**[Test build #46777 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46777/consoleFull)**
for PR 10001 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-159988308
@dilipbiswal Do you know why it is broken?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10003#discussion_r46005296
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/ProgressCassandraDialect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-159998104
@yhuai Hi Yin, in the discoverPartitions method, we are trying to create
the partition spec and are trying to cast a partition value to the
corresponding user
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-15342
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-15341
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-16105
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-16106
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user muxator opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10008
doc typo: "classificaion" -> "classification"
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/muxator/spark patch-1
Alternatively you can
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9993
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9993#issuecomment-16806
@marmbrus.Agreed. Thanks. I've not noticed there is introduced common
subexpression elimination in codegen recently. Close this now.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10009#discussion_r46009403
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -95,12 +95,15 @@ abstract class Expression extends
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10008#issuecomment-160001253
Trivial, but OK
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-160001389
Streaming DataFrames? I think this is a very significant feature!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10009#issuecomment-160001731
**[Test build #46783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46783/consoleFull)**
for PR 10009 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9397#issuecomment-160004312
**[Test build #46784 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46784/consoleFull)**
for PR 9397 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8610#issuecomment-160005256
**[Test build #46785 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46785/consoleFull)**
for PR 8610 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160007597
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-160008526
OK. I am merging this to master and branch 1.6. I will watch the builds and
see if there is any new issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-160008842
hmm... not sure why
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46778/consoleFull
used hadoop 2.3 profile.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#discussion_r46011037
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -606,9 +606,17 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation private[sql](
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10010
[SPARK-12020] [TESTS] [test-hadoop2.0] PR builder cannot trigger hadoop 2.0
test
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12020
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-160011060
@dilipbiswal I guess I did not ask my question clearly. I meant why 1.5 is
good but 1.6 is broken. There must be a change that exposed this issue.
---
If your project
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-160011485
@zsxwing @srowen I changed this to use setActive()/getActiveContext(),
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9843#discussion_r46011586
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/IDF.scala ---
@@ -211,14 +213,16 @@ private object IDFModel {
val n = v.size
v
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#discussion_r46011950
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -700,25 +700,28 @@ setMethod("collect",
# data of complex type can be held. But getting a cell
Github user winningsix commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-160014509
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-160017383
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-160017247
**[Test build #46791 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46791/consoleFull)**
for PR 10001 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9952#issuecomment-160018805
**[Test build #46790 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46790/consoleFull)**
for PR 9952 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9976#issuecomment-160020704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user karlhigley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9843#discussion_r46013493
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/IDF.scala ---
@@ -211,14 +213,16 @@ private object IDFModel {
val n = v.size
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8610#issuecomment-160027038
Leave a mark here, there is something wrong with a particular test case
causing the above failures, more details:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9995
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-160032280
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-160032215
**[Test build #46789 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46789/consoleFull)**
for PR 9990 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-160032281
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9976
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9994
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user carsonwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9991#discussion_r46014967
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ class SQLListenerMemoryLeakSuite
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9903#issuecomment-160033387
Thanks - merging this in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9840#discussion_r46015611
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DecimalType.scala ---
@@ -85,12 +85,24 @@ case class DecimalType(precision: Int, scale:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9478#issuecomment-160034859
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9872#issuecomment-160034888
**[Test build #2122 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2122/consoleFull)**
for PR 9872 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10009#discussion_r46015873
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -104,16 +104,13 @@ class
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9961#issuecomment-160002951
@marmbrus @cloud-fan Thank you !!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160005758
**[Test build #46782 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46782/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160005781
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160007559
**[Test build #46781 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46781/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160007599
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9976#issuecomment-160008050
> Test build #46776 has finished for PR 9976 at commit d626bfc.
>
> This patch fails from timeout after a configured wait of `250m`.
> This patch merges
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9976#issuecomment-160008054
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#discussion_r46012852
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -700,25 +700,28 @@ setMethod("collect",
# data of complex type can be held. But getting a cell
from
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-160018955
**[Test build #46793 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46793/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9952#issuecomment-160018847
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9952#issuecomment-160018848
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#issuecomment-160023496
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#issuecomment-160023492
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9769#issuecomment-160023298
**[Test build #46792 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46792/consoleFull)**
for PR 9769 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9478#issuecomment-160023236
**[Test build #46794 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46794/consoleFull)**
for PR 9478 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10008#issuecomment-160031822
Thanks for fixing it. I'm going to merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10010#issuecomment-160031786
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9861#discussion_r46014887
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -489,6 +494,13 @@ private[sql] class JDBCRDD(
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9861#issuecomment-160033166
LGTM - going to merge it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10009#issuecomment-160033692
**[Test build #46795 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46795/consoleFull)**
for PR 10009 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10009#discussion_r46015031
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -417,18 +413,12 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10009#discussion_r46015118
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -417,18 +413,12 @@ class
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9890#issuecomment-160033616
Thanks - I'm merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
1 - 100 of 438 matches
Mail list logo
