Github user dskrvk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9867#discussion_r46645444
--- Diff: dev/lint-java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#discussion_r46649405
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -1241,16 +1241,22 @@ class DataFrame private[sql](
* @since 1.4.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161880849
**[Test build #47186 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47186/consoleFull)**
for PR 9862 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10142#issuecomment-161886998
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10030#issuecomment-161859036
@shivaram, could we merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-161860480
**[Test build #47181 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47181/consoleFull)**
for PR 10006 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9867#issuecomment-161864244
**[Test build #47183 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47183/consoleFull)**
for PR 9867 at commit
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#issuecomment-161864325
Hi @steveloughran I've done one *rough* pass over the code, thanks for
working on this. This definitely looks promising, the unit tests seem pretty
good so its great
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10030#issuecomment-161881628
rebased to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161884039
**[Test build #47188 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47188/consoleFull)**
for PR 9862 at commit
GitHub user nongli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10142
[SPARK-12089] [SQL] Fix memory corrupt due to freeing a page being
referenced
When the spillable sort iterator was spilled, it was mistakenly keeping
the last page in memory rather than the
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10143#issuecomment-161890143
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-161902467
@cloud-fan Hi Wenchen, changed as per your suggestion. Please take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981#issuecomment-161902504
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-161861637
It looks like some MiMa tests are now failing in the Hadoop pre-YARN builds:
```
[info] spark-core: found 1 potential binary incompatibilities (filtered
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10135#issuecomment-161865737
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9962#issuecomment-161860680
**[Test build #47180 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47180/consoleFull)**
for PR 9962 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10123#issuecomment-161859174
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10123#issuecomment-161859173
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r46645061
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -699,12 +853,24 @@ private class FsApplicationAttemptInfo(
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10030#issuecomment-161877673
@sun-rui Could you bring this update to date with master ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9867#issuecomment-161880303
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9867#issuecomment-161880306
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8972#issuecomment-161880196
@jayantshekhar Any progress on it? I think we can refer to [the code
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9867#issuecomment-161880279
**[Test build #47183 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47183/consoleFull)**
for PR 9867 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9358#discussion_r46650956
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/Encoder.scala
---
@@ -37,3 +37,120 @@ trait Encoder[T] extends Serializable
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10030#issuecomment-161885844
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user dilipbiswal reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9981
[SPARK-11619][SQL] cannot use UDTF in DataFrame.selectExpr
Description of the problem from @cloud-fan
Actually this line:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161860534
**[Test build #47182 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47182/consoleFull)**
for PR 9862 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-161867221
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-161867223
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-161867116
**[Test build #47181 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47181/consoleFull)**
for PR 10006 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10107#issuecomment-161868467
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10107#issuecomment-161868423
**[Test build #47175 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47175/consoleFull)**
for PR 10107 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10107#issuecomment-161868469
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user swkimme opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10141
Update StructType.scala
The example will throw error like
:20: error: not found: value StructType
Need to add this line:
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
You can merge this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10140#issuecomment-161880524
**[Test build #47185 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47185/consoleFull)**
for PR 10140 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10141#issuecomment-161880513
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161881477
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161881474
**[Test build #47186 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47186/consoleFull)**
for PR 9862 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161881479
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10030#issuecomment-161885785
**[Test build #47187 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47187/consoleFull)**
for PR 10030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10030#issuecomment-161885841
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9963#discussion_r46651837
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -212,6 +233,7 @@ private[spark] abstract class
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10143
Pyspark typo & Add missing abstractmethod annotation
No jira is created since this is a trivial change.
@davies Please help review it
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10135#issuecomment-161891249
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10143#issuecomment-161893860
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10143#issuecomment-161893767
**[Test build #47190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47190/consoleFull)**
for PR 10143 at commit
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10073#discussion_r46654062
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -712,6 +711,54 @@ object PushPredicateThroughAggregate
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10140#issuecomment-161893780
**[Test build #47185 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47185/consoleFull)**
for PR 10140 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161865425
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161865406
**[Test build #47182 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47182/consoleFull)**
for PR 9862 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161865426
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10135#issuecomment-161866760
[Test build #47184 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47184/consoleFull)
for PR 10135 at commit
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10130#issuecomment-161880814
Rebase
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9963#issuecomment-161894154
**[Test build #47191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47191/consoleFull)**
for PR 9963 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10142#issuecomment-161899962
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10142#issuecomment-161899926
**[Test build #47189 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47189/consoleFull)**
for PR 10142 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10142#issuecomment-161899961
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10123#issuecomment-161859110
**[Test build #47179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47179/consoleFull)**
for PR 10123 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#discussion_r46646105
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -1241,16 +1241,22 @@ class DataFrame private[sql](
* @since 1.4.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10138#issuecomment-161872900
**[Test build #47177 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47177/consoleFull)**
for PR 10138 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10138#issuecomment-161872951
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10138#issuecomment-161872952
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10135#issuecomment-161891046
[Test build #47184 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47184/console)
for PR 10135 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10143#issuecomment-161891284
**[Test build #47190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47190/consoleFull)**
for PR 10143 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10135#issuecomment-161891248
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10143#issuecomment-161893859
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10140#issuecomment-161893887
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10140#issuecomment-161893888
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161899303
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161899301
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9862#issuecomment-161899206
**[Test build #47188 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47188/consoleFull)**
for PR 9862 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9962#issuecomment-161860741
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9962#issuecomment-161860740
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10118
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8534#issuecomment-161548934
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10124#issuecomment-161558277
**[Test build #2156 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2156/consoleFull)**
for PR 10124 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10124#issuecomment-161558331
**[Test build #2157 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2157/consoleFull)**
for PR 10124 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10127#issuecomment-161567164
@zsxwing Please check this.
I think this problem has been caused by the #9707
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10126#issuecomment-161570708
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user shijinkui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8072#discussion_r46532508
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -163,6 +163,23 @@ private[spark] class Client(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10128#issuecomment-161583163
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10007#issuecomment-161602541
**[Test build #47136 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47136/consoleFull)**
for PR 10007 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10123#issuecomment-161601910
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10123#issuecomment-161601793
**[Test build #47137 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47137/consoleFull)**
for PR 10123 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10123#issuecomment-161601912
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10127#issuecomment-161608484
**[Test build #2162 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2162/consoleFull)**
for PR 10127 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10128#issuecomment-161626933
I think it's not a good example to show that we need to allow
nondeterministic expressions in join codition. We can use `Repartition`
operator to fix data skew, like
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10123#issuecomment-161598230
**[Test build #47137 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47137/consoleFull)**
for PR 10123 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10129#discussion_r46546311
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -370,6 +371,12 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10120#issuecomment-161547817
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10120#issuecomment-161547681
**[Test build #47120 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47120/consoleFull)**
for PR 10120 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10120#issuecomment-161547818
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10077#issuecomment-161553258
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#issuecomment-161553502
**[Test build #47129 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47129/consoleFull)**
for PR 10092 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10095
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9756#discussion_r46529273
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/util/LinearDataGenerator.scala ---
@@ -131,35 +131,30 @@ object LinearDataGenerator {
eps:
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10127
[SPARK-12122][STREAMING] Prevent batches from being submitted twice after
recovering StreamingContext from checkpoint
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10126#issuecomment-161570578
**[Test build #47132 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47132/consoleFull)**
for PR 10126 at commit
1 - 100 of 534 matches
Mail list logo
