Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10413#issuecomment-166577642
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10413#issuecomment-166577576
**[Test build #48179 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48179/consoleFull)**
for PR 10413 at commit
[`afe2af0`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10348#issuecomment-166576436
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10348#issuecomment-166576442
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10348#issuecomment-166576336
**[Test build #48185 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48185/consoleFull)**
for PR 10348 at commit
[`85c3c4a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10331#issuecomment-166575199
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10331#issuecomment-166575195
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10331#issuecomment-166574866
**[Test build #48178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48178/consoleFull)**
for PR 10331 at commit
[`759c20d`](https://g
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10384#discussion_r48239945
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -22,91 +22,115 @@ import
org.apache.spark.mllib.util.ML
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10384#discussion_r48239605
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -23,15 +23,23 @@ import org.apache.spark.Logging
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10392#issuecomment-166573828
**[Test build #48186 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48186/consoleFull)**
for PR 10392 at commit
[`707ce5b`](https://gi
Github user pierre-borckmans commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10392#issuecomment-166572991
@srowen I fixed the scala style issues and the string interpolator.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10384#discussion_r48239336
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -23,15 +23,23 @@ import org.apache.spark.Logging
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10348#issuecomment-166572552
**[Test build #48185 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48185/consoleFull)**
for PR 10348 at commit
[`85c3c4a`](https://gi
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10384#discussion_r48239041
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -23,15 +23,23 @@ import org.apache.spark.Logging
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10392#issuecomment-166571605
**[Test build #48184 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48184/consoleFull)**
for PR 10392 at commit
[`c316479`](https://gi
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10289#discussion_r48238546
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientSuite.scala ---
@@ -43,12 +45,21 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
class Client
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10289#discussion_r48238449
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/BaseYarnClusterSuite.scala ---
@@ -116,7 +120,7 @@ abstract class BaseYarnClusterSuite
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10348#discussion_r48238445
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -661,6 +661,34 @@ setMethod("saveAsParquetFile",
write.parquet(x, path)
})
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10156#issuecomment-166570688
**[Test build #48183 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48183/consoleFull)**
for PR 10156 at commit
[`3b715f0`](https://gi
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-166570264
cc @liancheng @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#discussion_r48237984
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -90,6 +90,19 @@ private[sql] case class JDBC
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10392#discussion_r48237938
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -2073,8 +2073,9 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with Executo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10426#issuecomment-166569243
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10426#issuecomment-166569245
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10426#issuecomment-166569061
**[Test build #48172 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48172/consoleFull)**
for PR 10426 at commit
[`9c4d7ff`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10430#issuecomment-166568715
**[Test build #48182 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48182/consoleFull)**
for PR 10430 at commit
[`7547cf8`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10392#issuecomment-166568589
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10392#issuecomment-166568584
**[Test build #48181 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48181/consoleFull)**
for PR 10392 at commit
[`6e21b23`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10156#issuecomment-166568432
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10392#issuecomment-166568588
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-166568408
cc @liancheng @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10392#issuecomment-166568388
**[Test build #48181 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48181/consoleFull)**
for PR 10392 at commit
[`6e21b23`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10392#issuecomment-166568253
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10392#issuecomment-166568251
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10311#issuecomment-166568142
hi @JoshRosen , I opend https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10430 for hot
fix, if you think this is emergent. I'll spend more time to come up with a
proper fix.
--
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#discussion_r48236730
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -176,14 +178,23 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
BeforeA
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10430#issuecomment-166567713
cc @JoshRosen @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10430
[HOT-FIX] bypass hive test when parse logical plan to json
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10311 introduces some rare,
non-deterministic flakiness for hive udf tests, see
https://github.com
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10252#discussion_r48235929
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -330,6 +330,20 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
Github user pierre-borckmans commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10392#issuecomment-166565536
@srowen Agreed. I reverted my changes, and updated the warning message.
Thanks for your review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10386#issuecomment-166565039
Please add tests by referring #10409.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8915#issuecomment-166564763
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8915#issuecomment-166564761
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10418#issuecomment-166564656
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8915#issuecomment-166564709
**[Test build #48173 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48173/consoleFull)**
for PR 8915 at commit
[`592ed63`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10418#issuecomment-166564653
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10418#issuecomment-166564588
**[Test build #48177 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48177/consoleFull)**
for PR 10418 at commit
[`99cb7d8`](https://g
Github user Apo1 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10374#issuecomment-166564092
@hvanhovell Ok, I try. But I'm not sure where's the right place for the
unit test. `sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Rowtest` seems to
initialize a Generic
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10289#discussion_r48234885
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/BaseYarnClusterSuite.scala ---
@@ -116,7 +120,7 @@ abstract class BaseYarnClusterSuite
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10289#discussion_r48234838
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientSuite.scala ---
@@ -43,12 +45,21 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
class Clien
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10413#issuecomment-166563807
**[Test build #48179 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48179/consoleFull)**
for PR 10413 at commit
[`afe2af0`](https://gi
Github user pierre-borckmans commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10429#issuecomment-166562978
@rxin This PR incidentally also fixes another issue. Accessing a null
element in an array of IntegerType erroneously returned 0:
```
scala> val df =
sc
Github user pierre-borckmans commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10429#issuecomment-166561023
@rxin I added a small test, let me know if more should be added.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user echoTomei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10407#issuecomment-166560619
@SparkQA The build error shows that the function cancel() is not a member
of [java.util.concurrent.ScheduledFuture[_]] . I check the interface
ScheduledFuture API ,c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10411#issuecomment-166560438
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#issuecomment-166560467
@srowen Hello Sean: I am sorry that I have't been able to submit the PR
yet. I will conti. work on it tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10411#issuecomment-166560440
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10411#issuecomment-166560317
**[Test build #48176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48176/consoleFull)**
for PR 10411 at commit
[`b086ffd`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10174#issuecomment-166560115
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10174#issuecomment-166560116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10174#issuecomment-166560077
**[Test build #48175 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48175/consoleFull)**
for PR 10174 at commit
[`c7ea3b1`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10380#issuecomment-166558340
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10426#issuecomment-166558448
+1 FWIW I have been using the latest zinc for a while with Spark, including
0.3.9 and never had an issue
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10380#issuecomment-166558344
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10384#issuecomment-166558267
That LGTM; let me wait for comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10380#issuecomment-166558182
**[Test build #48168 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48168/consoleFull)**
for PR 10380 at commit
[`c130e31`](https://g
Github user Lewuathe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273#issuecomment-166557625
@srowen Sorry for late. Sure I close the PR. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10380#discussion_r48232961
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -62,15 +62,12 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10057#issuecomment-166557670
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10057#issuecomment-166557669
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user Lewuathe closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10273
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10057#issuecomment-166557494
**[Test build #48170 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48170/consoleFull)**
for PR 10057 at commit
[`4a56f6c`](https://g
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10429#issuecomment-166557339
Maybe DataFrameComplexTypeSuite?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10409#issuecomment-166556285
**[Test build #2244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2244/consoleFull)**
for PR 10409 at commit
[`46c0e7f`](https://
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10411#issuecomment-166557203
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10409#issuecomment-166557313
**[Test build #2246 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2246/consoleFull)**
for PR 10409 at commit
[`46c0e7f`](https://
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10411#issuecomment-166557205
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10423#issuecomment-166557245
**[Test build #2243 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2243/consoleFull)**
for PR 10423 at commit
[`b49df75`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10411#issuecomment-166557094
**[Test build #48174 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48174/consoleFull)**
for PR 10411 at commit
[`3a860b1`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10429#issuecomment-166557047
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user pierre-borckmans commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10429#issuecomment-166557024
@rxin Where should it go to be sure?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user pierre-borckmans commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10429#issuecomment-166556972
@rxin Sure!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10409
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10409#issuecomment-166556987
**[Test build #2245 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2245/consoleFull)**
for PR 10409 at commit
[`46c0e7f`](https://
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10429#issuecomment-166556865
Can you also add a unit test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10404#issuecomment-166556768
Yeah the benefits of supporting only 2.6 would be roughly:
- Another Jenkins build or two goes away
- Less JAR hell to reason about / newer transitive depende
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10409#issuecomment-166556731
Thanks - I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10374#issuecomment-166556640
@Apo1 Could you add a unit test for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
GitHub user pierre-borckmans opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10429
[SPARK 12477][SQL] Tungsten projection fails for null values in array fields
Accessing null elements in an array field fails when tungsten is enabled.
It works in Spark 1.3.1, and in Sp
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10374#issuecomment-166556560
CC: @rxin @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10156#issuecomment-166556355
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10252#discussion_r48232309
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/DStreamGraph.scala ---
@@ -171,6 +173,23 @@ final private[streaming] class DStreamGraph ext
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10252#discussion_r48232238
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/DStream.scala ---
@@ -330,6 +330,20 @@ abstract class DStream[T: ClassTag] (
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10331#issuecomment-166555191
**[Test build #48178 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48178/consoleFull)**
for PR 10331 at commit
[`759c20d`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10418#issuecomment-166555105
**[Test build #48177 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48177/consoleFull)**
for PR 10418 at commit
[`99cb7d8`](https://gi
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-166553543
cc @liancheng @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#discussion_r48231701
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -90,6 +90,19 @@ private[sql] case class JDBC
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10331#issuecomment-166553530
The last build failure was irrelevant.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user Apo1 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10374#discussion_r48231498
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/rows.scala
---
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ class GenericRow(protected[sql] val values:
401 - 500 of 524 matches
Mail list logo
