Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166946904
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user yzhou2001 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10450
[SPARK-10838][SPARK-11576][SQL] Incorrect results or exceptions when using
self-joins
I believe the issue is that the mapping between the columns in the join
condition and those in the right
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48364810
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCacheSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
GitHub user sureshthalamati opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452
[SPARK-12504][SQL] Masking credentials in the sql plan explain output for
JDBC data sources.
This fix masks JDBC credentials in the explain output. URL patterns to
specify credential
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10453
[SPARK-12507][Streaming][Document]Update Streaming configurations for 1.6
/cc @tdas @brkyvz
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48372644
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,26 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer,
var
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10448#issuecomment-166959071
**[Test build #2252 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2252/consoleFull)**
for PR 10448 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10407#issuecomment-166967417
Can you close this PR now that you've opened another one #10447
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166972579
The rest of it looks OK. @zsxwing can you take another pass?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48371257
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializer.scala ---
@@ -109,6 +111,9 @@ class KryoSerializer(conf: SparkConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-166972517
**[Test build #48250 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48250/consoleFull)**
for PR 8744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10453#issuecomment-166976157
**[Test build #48251 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48251/consoleFull)**
for PR 10453 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10449#issuecomment-166957247
**[Test build #48247 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48247/consoleFull)**
for PR 10449 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10449#issuecomment-166957536
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451
[SPARK-12503] [SQL] Pushing Limit Through Union
"Rule that applies to a Limit on top of a Union. The original Limit won't
go away after applying this rule, but additional Limit nodes will be
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#issuecomment-166966798
I've updated the patch with the comments, and reworked how the updated
probe works, removing the need to have provider-specific state cached, returned
in the
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#discussion_r48370011
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/stat/StatFunctions.scala
---
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ private[sql] object StatFunctions extends
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#discussion_r48374502
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcFilters.scala ---
@@ -26,15 +26,47 @@ import org.apache.spark.Logging
import
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10431#issuecomment-166980007
Should we backport it now? I guess we do not need to wait for the release,
right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48376815
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,26 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10455#discussion_r48376752
--- Diff: dev/tests/pr_public_classes.sh ---
@@ -24,36 +24,44 @@
#
# Arg1: The Github Pull Request Actual Commit
#+ known as
Github user BrianLondon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10416#issuecomment-166984326
This change worked for me on an AWS hosted Kinesis stream.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457#issuecomment-166997028
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167012366
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48388692
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48389119
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/TaskMetrics.scala
---
@@ -215,6 +215,18 @@ class TaskMetrics extends Serializable {
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167015671
@wyaron please file a JIRA and attach to the title of this PR. See how
other patches are opened.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#issuecomment-167015712
What about taking the whitelist approach and only include the dbtable (with
possible truncation) in the `toString`. Its not great when these are too long
as they
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167017518
Let me leave a comment. I tested some cases with this PR and looks
generally working fine. But I would like to mention one thing that I am pretty
sure you guys
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167017698
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167017632
The changes here look OK to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167020880
**[Test build #48272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48272/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167022107
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167022108
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167022099
**[Test build #48273 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48273/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#discussion_r48391917
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -90,6 +90,11 @@ private[sql] case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48391896
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167026635
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167033129
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167033099
**[Test build #48272 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48272/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167033130
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167033198
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167035311
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463
[SPARK-12502][Build][Python] Script /dev/run-tests fails when IBM Java is
used
fix an exception with IBM JDK by removing update field from a JavaVersion
tuple. This is because IBM JDK does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10462#issuecomment-167035224
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167035212
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10464#issuecomment-167036016
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465
[SPARK-12515][SQL][DOC] minor doc update for read.jdbc
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/felixcheung/spark dfreaderjdbcdoc
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167039229
@HyukjinKwon ISTM the root problem is that catalyst cannot fill required
columns on-the-fly for data sources. `unhandleFilters` is little related to the
problem.
---
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167041637
ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10463#issuecomment-167042504
**[Test build #48285 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48285/consoleFull)**
for PR 10463 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48388339
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48388764
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167012620
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48389780
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer, var
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167015292
**[Test build #48269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48269/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167015301
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167015302
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#discussion_r48390321
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcFilters.scala ---
@@ -50,37 +82,18 @@ private[orc] object OrcFilters extends Logging {
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10384#discussion_r48390400
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -53,6 +58,7 @@ class RegressionMetrics @Since("1.2.0") (
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10384#discussion_r48390399
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -61,7 +67,6 @@ class RegressionMetrics @Since("1.2.0") (
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#discussion_r48390348
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala ---
@@ -174,4 +175,33 @@ class OrcSourceSuite extends OrcSuite {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167019833
**[Test build #48273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48273/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167026636
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167030665
**[Test build #48271 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48271/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#issuecomment-167030998
**[Test build #48270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48270/consoleFull)**
for PR 10377 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167030774
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167030773
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167035310
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167036143
**[Test build #48281 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48281/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167039836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167039831
If this patch merged, the comment below is not suitable for `JDBCRelation`.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167039814
**[Test build #48279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48279/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167039837
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48395965
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167042309
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167042286
**[Test build #48281 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48281/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167042310
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#issuecomment-167011428
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#issuecomment-167011430
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10448
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167012329
**[Test build #48264 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48264/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#discussion_r48388602
--- Diff: dev/deps/spark-deps-hadoop-2.4 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+JavaEWAH-0.3.2.jar
--- End diff --
Do we have to maintain these lists?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167012368
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#discussion_r48389162
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -858,6 +859,30 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10384#discussion_r48390247
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -23,15 +23,23 @@ import org.apache.spark.Logging
import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167016785
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167016754
**[Test build #48257 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48257/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167016784
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10377#issuecomment-167018079
**[Test build #48270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48270/consoleFull)**
for PR 10377 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167018809
**[Test build #48271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48271/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-167022431
**[Test build #48274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48274/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167024446
**[Test build #48275 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48275/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167025712
**[Test build #48277 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48277/consoleFull)**
for PR 10427 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457#issuecomment-167032184
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457#issuecomment-167032074
**[Test build #48260 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48260/consoleFull)**
for PR 10457 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10457#issuecomment-167032181
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user yaooqinn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10462
[Core] remove redundant collection conversion.
remove redundant collection conversion.
Array toArray
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167037407
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167037408
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
101 - 200 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
