Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215385742
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215385539
**[Test build #57245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57245/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215379968
**[Test build #57244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57244/consoleFull)**
for PR 12066 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215379043
**[Test build #57243 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57243/consoleFull)**
for PR 12066 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215374433
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215374404
**[Test build #57241 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57241/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215374427
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#discussion_r61401723
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/UDTRegistration.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215372214
**[Test build #57241 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57241/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12598#issuecomment-215372240
**[Test build #57242 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57242/consoleFull)**
for PR 12598 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12598#issuecomment-215371295
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215370955
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215370951
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215370706
**[Test build #57237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57237/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12695#issuecomment-215369309
Isn't the URI just `file:///D:/test`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61399541
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/UDTSerializationBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215367423
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215367301
**[Test build #57238 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57238/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215367425
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12341#issuecomment-215366802
**[Test build #57240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57240/consoleFull)**
for PR 12341 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215366426
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215366419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215366183
**[Test build #57233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57233/consoleFull)**
for PR 12746 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-215365815
ping @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12528#issuecomment-215365706
Thanks @shearerp but can you also very briefly mention how to invoke
`jupyter` in the programming guide? just a sentence would suffice, so that
people are clear this is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12341#issuecomment-215365299
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#discussion_r61397728
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -195,10 +195,13 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F <:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61397517
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/UDTSerializationBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12747#issuecomment-215363871
You can also remove the one in `ANNGradient` right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215363656
**[Test build #57239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57239/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12419#discussion_r61395945
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -379,15 +379,21 @@ class RowMatrix @Since("1.0.0") (
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-215359267
If the base change is just bringing the `PMMLExportable` trait to ML in a
reasonable form, that seems fine. I might not know enough to know if I'm
missing something, but
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12707#issuecomment-215357914
Yeah, the problem is that Java 8 has a much stricter javadoc tool. `@group`
isn't a valid javadoc tag, so when `ALSModel.scala` gets translated to Java to
javadoc it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215357553
**[Test build #57238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57238/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215357222
**[Test build #57236 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57236/consoleFull)**
for PR 12752 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215357266
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215357267
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61393700
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -929,6 +932,50 @@ def test_apply_binary_term_freqs(self):
": expected " +
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215355549
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215355548
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215355402
**[Test build #57235 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57235/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215355291
**[Test build #57237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57237/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61392731
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61392206
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61391861
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9354#issuecomment-215353152
Yes, this PR should be closed. Per discussion in the JIRA, this just is too
much SPI to open up for not obvious gain. There may be much more modest
refactorings that
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215352568
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215352565
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215352327
**[Test build #57230 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57230/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61391277
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -929,6 +932,50 @@ def test_apply_binary_term_freqs(self):
": expected " +
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61391177
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61391003
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61391033
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61390984
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215350745
**[Test build #57236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57236/consoleFull)**
for PR 12752 at commit
Github user mwws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215350461
@chenghao-intel
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user mwws opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752
[Spark-14976][Streaming] make StreamingContext.textFileStream support
wildcard
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
make StreamingContext.textFileStream support wildcard
like
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#issuecomment-215350491
If it's just porting old API params to the new API, seems sensible. The
implementation looks sensible to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61389927
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61389700
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215347510
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215347507
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215347337
**[Test build #57234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57234/consoleFull)**
for PR 12746 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-215346566
@mengxr @dbtsai Thanks for reviewing this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-215345283
Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215344251
**[Test build #57235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57235/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215343973
@cloud-fan Could you also update the benchmark?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12736#issuecomment-215342856
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12736#issuecomment-215342854
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12736#issuecomment-215342650
**[Test build #57227 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57227/consoleFull)**
for PR 12736 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61387931
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy() {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61387937
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy() {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61386974
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy() {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61386945
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy() {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215340310
**[Test build #57234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57234/consoleFull)**
for PR 12746 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215340073
retest this please?? Why did you run all the unit tests??
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215339652
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215339654
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215339565
**[Test build #57231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57231/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215338341
@cloud-fan , @mengxr, it would be worth to add ```final``` to a declaration
of ```UnsafeArrayData ``` for encouraging method inlining by JIT compiler, as
follows:
Github user BenFradet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12467#discussion_r61384769
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormulaSuite.scala ---
@@ -290,4 +291,18 @@ class RFormulaSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#discussion_r61384326
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/Instrumentation.scala ---
@@ -85,6 +85,13 @@ private[ml] class Instrumentation[E <: Estimator[_]]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215335519
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12736#discussion_r61383924
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -488,14 +488,6 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215335518
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215335486
**[Test build #57229 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57229/consoleFull)**
for PR 11601 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12724#issuecomment-215335070
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12724#issuecomment-215335073
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12724#issuecomment-215334962
**[Test build #57221 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57221/consoleFull)**
for PR 12724 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-215334819
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-215334571
**[Test build #57228 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57228/consoleFull)**
for PR 12604 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-215334815
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215334370
**[Test build #57233 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57233/consoleFull)**
for PR 12746 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12720#issuecomment-215334359
@hvanhovell That make sense, I will take another deep look tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61383378
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#issuecomment-215334099
Merging in master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12720#discussion_r61383358
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -337,6 +337,16 @@ case class PrettyAttribute(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#issuecomment-215332700
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
701 - 800 of 866 matches
Mail list logo
