Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13451
**[Test build #59776 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59776/consoleFull)**
for PR 13451 at commit
[`9bedd70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13452
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59775/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13452
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13452
**[Test build #59775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59775/consoleFull)**
for PR 13452 at commit
[`814ccf6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13453
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13453
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59777/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13453
**[Test build #59777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59777/consoleFull)**
for PR 13453 at commit
[`ab7df87`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13269#discussion_r65460601
--- Diff: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Encoders.scala
---
@@ -208,7 +209,7 @@ object Encoders {
BoundReference(0, Object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850
**[Test build #59788 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59788/consoleFull)**
for PR 12850 at commit
[`8b7a0bf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850
I added the missing part, `e.deterministic` check in
`isAssociativelyFoldable`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13425
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13425
LGTM, merging to master and branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850
Thank you for feedback. I'm really happy with your attention!
For the non-deterministic part, we can add a single condition in
`isAssociativelyFoldable`.
If some of operand of the expre
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433
LGTM, pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13269
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59772/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13269
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13269
**[Test build #59772 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59772/consoleFull)**
for PR 13269 at commit
[`c294b3b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9162
@JoshRosen @rxin Any suggestions to improve this fix to get it merged ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13450
Merging to branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13270
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433
**[Test build #59787 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59787/consoleFull)**
for PR 13433 at commit
[`7860982`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13270
Merging to master and branch-2.0.
@xwu0226 @yhuai Thanks for the review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850
UDF is the first thing I came out, and yes, it must be deterministic. But
as we have the `deterministic` property in `Expression`, I think it's possible
for users to create non-deterministic expre
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13270
LGTM. @liancheng Can you merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13428
**[Test build #59786 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59786/consoleFull)**
for PR 13428 at commit
[`b87e0c9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13455
lgtm pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13452
**[Test build #59785 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59785/consoleFull)**
for PR 13452 at commit
[`f5e56c9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13428
Haha, no problem, I'll take a virtual high-five :P
I agree `default(runtime)` does make more sense, I'll change that up.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13455
**[Test build #59783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59783/consoleFull)**
for PR 13455 at commit
[`bb93f5b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433
**[Test build #59784 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59784/consoleFull)**
for PR 13433 at commit
[`dea71f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433#discussion_r65456310
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/cache.scala ---
@@ -19,15 +19,19 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13290
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13455
[SPARK-15719][SQL] Disables writing Parquet summary files by default
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR disables writing Parquet summary files by default (i.e., w
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13452
**[Test build #59782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59782/consoleFull)**
for PR 13452 at commit
[`758ff54`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13418#discussion_r65455758
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1468,7 +1468,8 @@ object DecimalAggregates extends R
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13335
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13335
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59771/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13335
**[Test build #59771 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59771/consoleFull)**
for PR 13335 at commit
[`8dfc105`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13428
@BryanCutler Am I dreaming or is this for real. I've been trying to solve
this issue for a very long time. I honestly want to give you a high five now :)
`default(runtime)` makes sense to me. Some
Github user frreiss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r65454461
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1695,16 +1695,176 @@ object RewriteCorrelatedScalarSub
Github user GayathriMurali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13285
@yanboliang `$example on$` and `$example off$` needs to be included in
ml.R. All the code encompassed within example on and off would be joined and a
single code block will be produced in th
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13399#discussion_r65454175
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -783,6 +783,16 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLCont
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13399
LGTM except a minor style comment, thanks for working on it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13452#discussion_r65453530
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -500,10 +500,10 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
DataF
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13453
**[Test build #59781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59781/consoleFull)**
for PR 13453 at commit
[`823479d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13450
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59766/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13450
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13269
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13269
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59769/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13451
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59770/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13451
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13450
**[Test build #59766 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59766/consoleFull)**
for PR 13450 at commit
[`1d52cfb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13269
**[Test build #59769 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59769/consoleFull)**
for PR 13269 at commit
[`e321e4c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13451
**[Test build #59770 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59770/consoleFull)**
for PR 13451 at commit
[`fa1db6a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Seems like Jakob is ok with the current code; @dhruve could you resolve
conflicts so we can merge this? Sorry for the delay.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13450
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59764/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13450
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13450
**[Test build #59764 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59764/consoleFull)**
for PR 13450 at commit
[`0c08f31`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13428
Using the wildcard for the fallback conf "default(*)" has the side effect
of resolving transitive dependencies from all scopes - so it will grab test
jars, etc
Would it be more appropriate t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59768/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13342
**[Test build #59768 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59768/consoleFull)**
for PR 13342 at commit
[`d6bb884`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
**[Test build #59778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59778/consoleFull)**
for PR 13454 at commit
[`ccb6c20`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000
@srowen @JoshRosen @holdenk could you take a look and merge this pr?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13290
**[Test build #59780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59780/consoleFull)**
for PR 13290 at commit
[`071b670`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13428
**[Test build #59779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59779/consoleFull)**
for PR 13428 at commit
[`ece86f1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433
LGTM except for two minor issues, and pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850
Hi, @cloud-fan and @davies .
How do you think about the above?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13290#discussion_r65450769
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1448,6 +1450,38 @@ class Analyzer(
}
/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850
Thank you for deep discussion on this. I think like this.
For 1), there are **machine-generated** queries by BI tools. This is an
important category of queries. In many cases, BIs (or
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433#discussion_r65450866
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -467,9 +470,11 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Tre
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13454
[SPARK-15714] Fix flaky o.a.s.scheduler.BlacklistIntegrationSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
BlacklistIntegrationSuite (introduced by SPARK-10372) is a bit flaky
be
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13453
**[Test build #59777 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59777/consoleFull)**
for PR 13453 at commit
[`ab7df87`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11461
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59765/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11461
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433#discussion_r65450329
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -424,9 +424,12 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Tre
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11461
**[Test build #59765 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59765/consoleFull)**
for PR 11461 at commit
[`ae80adb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13453
[SPARK-15715][SQL] Fix alter partition with storage information in Hive
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This command didn't work. Now it does:
```
ALTER TABLE
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13451
**[Test build #59776 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59776/consoleFull)**
for PR 13451 at commit
[`9bedd70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13452
**[Test build #59775 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59775/consoleFull)**
for PR 13452 at commit
[`814ccf6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13452
cc @yhuai @andrewor14 @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13452
[SPARK-15718][SQL] better error message for writing bucketed data
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we don't support bucketing for `save` and `insertInto`.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433
**[Test build #59774 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59774/consoleFull)**
for PR 13433 at commit
[`7ba2c12`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433
**[Test build #59773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59773/consoleFull)**
for PR 13433 at commit
[`c0bdfe2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59773/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13416
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13433
**[Test build #59773 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59773/consoleFull)**
for PR 13433 at commit
[`c0bdfe2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13416
merging to master and branch 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13416
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559
Oh thanks for pointing out the flaky test, I think I figured out the
problem, opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15714. Weird I
never this running locally -- I'd expect this race to b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13269
**[Test build #59772 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59772/consoleFull)**
for PR 13269 at commit
[`c294b3b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13355
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13355
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59762/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13355
**[Test build #59762 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59762/consoleFull)**
for PR 13355 at commit
[`4d3fc6f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13418#discussion_r65441184
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1468,7 +1468,8 @@ object DecimalAggregates extends Rule
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12850
I discussed it with @davies offline and here is our conclusion:
1. This feature is not that important, as users can always do it manually,
i.e. change the add/multiply order, which is not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13448
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13448
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59759/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13448
**[Test build #59759 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59759/consoleFull)**
for PR 13448 at commit
[`010110e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
301 - 400 of 761 matches
Mail list logo
