Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758#discussion_r67992617
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/GenericArrayData.scala
---
@@ -142,3 +196,414 @@ class GenericArrayData(val arra
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758#discussion_r67992529
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/GenericArrayData.scala
---
@@ -23,7 +23,60 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.cataly
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13830
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60995/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13830
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758#discussion_r67992307
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/GenericArrayData.scala
---
@@ -142,3 +164,415 @@ class GenericArrayData(val arra
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13830
**[Test build #60995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60995/consoleFull)**
for PR 13830 at commit
[`d898735`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61001/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
**[Test build #61001 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61001/consoleFull)**
for PR 13758 at commit
[`e04ca2c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13811
hi @inouehrs , sorry I haven't noticed that you already have a PR for this
JIRA ticket.
Yea the root cause of this bug is exactly what you described in your PR
descption, thanks for finding th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13818
**[Test build #3124 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3124/consoleFull)**
for PR 13818 at commit
[`8a058c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13835
Is this PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13811 related?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13764#discussion_r67991258
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcQuerySuite.scala ---
@@ -462,4 +463,27 @@ class OrcQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Be
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13823
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13823
Merging with master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380
LGTM pending tests!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13835
**[Test build #61003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61003/consoleFull)**
for PR 13835 at commit
[`447ddcd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13835
cc @yhuai @liancheng @clockfly
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13835
[SPARK-16100][SQL] fix bug when use Map as the buffer type of Aggregator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The root cause is in `MapObjects`. Its parameter `loopVar` is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60990/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13806
**[Test build #60990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60990/consoleFull)**
for PR 13806 at commit
[`2a55091`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13834
**[Test build #61002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61002/consoleFull)**
for PR 13834 at commit
[`04c8637`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13834
[TRIVIAL] [CORE] [ScriptTransform] move printing of stderr buffer before
closing the outstream
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, if due to some failure, th
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
It sounds like `PreWriteCheck` rule is a good home for adding this checking.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
**[Test build #61001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61001/consoleFull)**
for PR 13758 at commit
[`e04ca2c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13820#discussion_r67989751
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -173,10 +182,9 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"GeneralizedLinearRegressionModel"),
return(ans)
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13820#discussion_r67989793
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -471,24 +469,13 @@ setMethod("write.ml", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel", path = "c
invisibl
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
**[Test build #61000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61000/consoleFull)**
for PR 13778 at commit
[`a0b81ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13820#discussion_r67989738
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -124,24 +137,20 @@ setMethod("spark.glm", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula"),
#' summary(model)
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13820#discussion_r67989718
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -99,10 +114,8 @@ setMethod("spark.glm", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula"),
return(new(
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13820#discussion_r67989707
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -99,10 +114,8 @@ setMethod("spark.glm", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula"),
return(new(
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13817
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13072
**[Test build #60999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60999/consoleFull)**
for PR 13072 at commit
[`2f306a7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60998/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
**[Test build #60998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60998/consoleFull)**
for PR 13713 at commit
[`1ebfaf6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933
@hellertime ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13072
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13143
Is it because MesosDriver actually threw an exception?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
**[Test build #60996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60996/consoleFull)**
for PR 13778 at commit
[`d603cc2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13829
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13829
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60993/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60996/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user tnachen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13143#discussion_r67988954
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -120,14 +120,25 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedul
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13829
**[Test build #60993 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60993/consoleFull)**
for PR 13829 at commit
[`6473e6d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13077
@devaraj-kavali Ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
**[Test build #60996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60996/consoleFull)**
for PR 13778 at commit
[`d603cc2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13715
**[Test build #60997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60997/consoleFull)**
for PR 13715 at commit
[`9e0aedf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13326
jenkins please retest
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
**[Test build #60998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60998/consoleFull)**
for PR 13713 at commit
[`1ebfaf6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13713
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user tnachen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13715#discussion_r67988575
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -382,59 +382,97 @@ private[spark] cla
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13715
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user KevinGrealish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13824
That is possible. It was done as is to be a narrower fix and less likely to
cause other behavior to change. It does not look like env hashmap is read by
the rest of the function (only written
GitHub user KevinGrealish reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13824
[SPARK-16110][YARN][PYSPARK] Fix allowing python version to be speicifed
per submit for cluster mode.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This fix allows submit of
Github user KevinGrealish closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13824
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r67987779
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -228,4 +222,152 @@ class DataFrameReaderWriterSuite e
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r67987629
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -228,4 +222,152 @@ class DataFrameReaderWriterSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60991/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r67987384
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -228,4 +222,152 @@ class DataFrameReaderWriterSuite e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13699
**[Test build #60991 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60991/consoleFull)**
for PR 13699 at commit
[`13c9b2f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13824
Is it possible to move "spark.yarn.appMasterEnv.*" related codes to the
bottom of the function? Looks like other env variables may also have the same
problem like you mentioned for `PYSPARK_DRIVER
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13832
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13832
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60992/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13832
**[Test build #60992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60992/consoleFull)**
for PR 13832 at commit
[`a5ec358`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13827
LGTM. Thanks! Merged to master and branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13827
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13830
**[Test build #60995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60995/consoleFull)**
for PR 13830 at commit
[`d898735`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13809
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13809
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60988/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13808
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60989/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380
**[Test build #60994 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60994/consoleFull)**
for PR 13380 at commit
[`65534a0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13808
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13809
**[Test build #60988 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60988/consoleFull)**
for PR 13809 at commit
[`882a24f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13808
**[Test build #60989 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60989/consoleFull)**
for PR 13808 at commit
[`5914689`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13380#discussion_r67985277
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/ReadWrite.scala ---
@@ -116,6 +129,9 @@ abstract class MLWriter extends BaseReadWrite with
Logging
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13809
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13809
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60985/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13809
**[Test build #60985 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60985/consoleFull)**
for PR 13809 at commit
[`61dfef8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778#discussion_r67984779
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -558,6 +558,18 @@ def check_datatype(datatype):
_verify_type(PythonOnlyPoint(1.0, 2.0), PythonOnlyUDT
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13831
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13831
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60987/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13831
**[Test build #60987 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60987/consoleFull)**
for PR 13831 at commit
[`a53b7fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13829
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60984/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user sun-rui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13760
LGTM except on minor comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13829
One small comment. LGTM otherwise.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13829
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13760#discussion_r67983701
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2236,12 +2236,15 @@ test_that("gapply() on a DataFrame", {
actual <- collect(df1)
ex
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13829#discussion_r67983638
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/BufferHolder.java
---
@@ -45,7 +45,12 @@ public BufferHolder(Unsaf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13829
**[Test build #60984 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60984/consoleFull)**
for PR 13829 at commit
[`24dd723`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13809
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13809
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60986/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13809
**[Test build #60986 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60986/consoleFull)**
for PR 13809 at commit
[`a96d547`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13833
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user tilumi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13833
[SPARK-16124][SQL] fix `getHiveFile` return file url in jar that cannot be
load in SQL
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I create a temp file from output stream of the fil
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60976/
Test PASSed.
---
I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
101 - 200 of 815 matches
Mail list logo
