GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13929
[SPARK-16220][SQL] Add scope to show functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark currently shows all functions when issue a `SHOW FUNCTIONS` command.
This PR refines
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13928
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13928
Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13928
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13928
**[Test build #61319 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61319/consoleFull)**
for PR 13928 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13928
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61319/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
**[Test build #61320 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61320/consoleFull)**
for PR 13603 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r68644592
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -135,7 +129,7 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13928
LGTM pending Jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
I'll finish looking at this later today after #13826 gets merged, so it's
easier to see what's new here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68642776
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskInfo.scala ---
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.annotation.DeveloperApi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13926
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61312/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13926
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13926
**[Test build #61312 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61312/consoleFull)**
for PR 13926 at commit
Github user keypointt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921#discussion_r68642313
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -277,14 +277,32 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
#' @param k Number of centers
#'
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r68642373
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/ConsumerStrategy.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68642421
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskInfo.scala ---
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.annotation.DeveloperApi
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68642206
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
val
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13926
BTW, @rxin @yhuai @marmbrus I am still investigating the potential issues
for `Hive As A Data Source`. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68641914
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskInfo.scala ---
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.annotation.DeveloperApi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13926
Thanks! @hvanhovell
After going over the other functions that called
`sparkSession.sessionState.catalog.createTable`, this is the only function that
has such an issue.
---
If your
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13027
@tgravescs For minor releases, we (the community) usually do not put much
effort on the QA, it's risky to pull in large change (like this one) it. At
least, I don't have enough confidence to merge
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13378#discussion_r68640123
--- Diff: docs/mllib-guide.md ---
@@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ Deprecations:
We encourage users to use `spark.ml.regression.LinearRegresson` and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13928
**[Test build #61319 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61319/consoleFull)**
for PR 13928 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13928
cc @mengxr @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user BryanCutler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13928
[SPARK-16231][PYSPARK][ML][EXAMPLES] dataframe_example.py fails to convert
ML style vectors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Need to convert ML Vectors to the old MLlib
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13888
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13888
Merged into master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13378
Other than that, this looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826
**[Test build #61318 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61318/consoleFull)**
for PR 13826 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826#discussion_r68639726
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -298,10 +298,10 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user junyangq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13921
It would be better to group write.ml (KM) into the doc as well. Also please
include a full screenshot of the doc page.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
@junyangq You can use `dev/lint-r` to check R code style on your local
machine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927#discussion_r68638675
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -420,44 +440,96 @@ setMethod("spark.naiveBayes", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "form
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826
**[Test build #61317 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61317/consoleFull)**
for PR 13826 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826#discussion_r68638551
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -298,10 +298,10 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61315/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
**[Test build #61315 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61315/consoleFull)**
for PR 13927 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13848
Thanks for taking a look, I've updated the comment (just waiting for the
sanity checks from jenkins)
btw, if you're interested in following up on leaked threads, I opened this:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13027
@davies Why haven't we pulled this into branch 1.6? can we upmerge and
pull in so that if we do 1.6.3 its there?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927#discussion_r68638138
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -420,44 +440,96 @@ setMethod("spark.naiveBayes", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "form
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
**[Test build #61315 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61315/consoleFull)**
for PR 13927 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13848
**[Test build #61316 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61316/consoleFull)**
for PR 13848 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927#discussion_r68637735
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -420,44 +440,96 @@ setMethod("spark.naiveBayes", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "form
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826#discussion_r68637198
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -293,13 +292,16 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826
**[Test build #61314 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61314/consoleFull)**
for PR 13826 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61309/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
**[Test build #61309 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61309/consoleFull)**
for PR 13765 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826#discussion_r68636634
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -293,13 +292,16 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927#discussion_r68636543
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -233,9 +233,10 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"GeneralizedLinearRegressionModel"),
# Makes predictions
GitHub user junyangq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13927
[SPARK-16143][R] group AFT survival regression methods docs in a single Rd
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR groups `spark.survreg`, `summary(AFT)`,
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13848
LGTM -- thanks for fixing this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826#discussion_r68635883
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -293,13 +292,16 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13848#discussion_r68635755
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManagerSuite.scala ---
@@ -157,14 +157,27 @@ class TaskSetManagerSuite extends
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13848#discussion_r68635687
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManagerSuite.scala ---
@@ -819,6 +833,8 @@ class TaskSetManagerSuite extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13916
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826#discussion_r68634181
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -293,13 +292,16 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13916
LGTM - merging to master/2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13107
**[Test build #3133 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3133/consoleFull)**
for PR 13107 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826#discussion_r68632131
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -272,6 +278,45 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61313 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61313/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826#discussion_r68631252
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -272,6 +278,45 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13926
Look pretty good. Are there any other places where this can happen?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826#discussion_r68630849
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -293,13 +292,16 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863
3. Okay, no strong feelings on this one.
4b. I dont think there is a need for Java tests for methods which need
class tags. Those are probably least likely to be used.
---
If your project
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13826#discussion_r68630201
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -293,13 +292,16 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13925
@lihongliustc could you take a look at the JIRA ticket, and respond to
@srowen's very valid comment? I don't think we should do this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61308/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13926
**[Test build #61312 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61312/consoleFull)**
for PR 13926 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61308 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61308/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13926
[SPARK-16229] [SQL] Drop Empty Table After CREATE TABLE AS SELECT fails
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `CREATE TABLE AS SELECT`, if the `SELECT` query failed, the
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r68629750
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/ConsumerStrategy.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r68629355
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskInfo.scala ---
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.annotation.DeveloperApi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13720
**[Test build #61311 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61311/consoleFull)**
for PR 13720 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61307/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61307 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61307/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13816
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61310/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13816
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13816
**[Test build #61310 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61310/consoleFull)**
for PR 13816 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
Ping @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13918
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13918
Hi, @liancheng .
Now, it passes the Jenkins again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13918
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61306/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13848
@devaraj-kavali @kayousterhout https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996
added a flaky test, this fix should be pretty straightforward.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13918
**[Test build #61306 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61306/consoleFull)**
for PR 13918 at commit
Github user koertkuipers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r68624316
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -135,7 +129,7 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13915
Hi, @rxin and @srowen .
I also worry about merge conflicts. It's really annoying for committers.
So, what about the stepwise approach? We have 2395 files and found 90 files
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13816
**[Test build #61310 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61310/consoleFull)**
for PR 13816 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
Hi, @cloud-fan .
Now, this PR can handle all combinations of Repartition and RepartitionBy.
I updated the description of PR and JIRA, too.
Thank you so much for making this PR much
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13107#discussion_r68620470
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/ShuffleExternalSorter.java ---
@@ -72,7 +72,10 @@
private final TaskContext taskContext;
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765
**[Test build #61309 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61309/consoleFull)**
for PR 13765 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13107
**[Test build #3133 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3133/consoleFull)**
for PR 13107 at commit
301 - 400 of 613 matches
Mail list logo
