Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676
**[Test build #63901 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63901/consoleFull)**
for PR 14676 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63894/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #63894 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63894/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678#discussion_r75065275
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -322,11 +322,6 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14670
**[Test build #63900 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63900/consoleFull)**
for PR 14670 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676#discussion_r75065140
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/inline-table.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+
+-- single row, without table and column alias
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14660
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155
I have took a close look at `HiveExternalCatalog`. My overall feeling is
that the current version still not very clear and people may have a hard time
to understand the code. Let me also think about
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14660
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63895/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14660
**[Test build #63895 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63895/consoleFull)**
for PR 14660 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
**[Test build #63899 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63899/consoleFull)**
for PR 14678 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75064724
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -81,6 +86,18 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(client:
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75064596
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1082,57 +1343,62 @@ private class LogisticCostFun(
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75064560
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -200,22 +348,73 @@ private[spark] class
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75064362
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -200,22 +348,73 @@ private[spark] class
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75064380
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1082,57 +1343,62 @@ private class LogisticCostFun(
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75064330
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1082,57 +1343,62 @@ private class LogisticCostFun(
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75064275
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1082,57 +1343,62 @@ private class LogisticCostFun(
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75064097
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -1082,57 +1343,62 @@ private class LogisticCostFun(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75063920
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +161,147 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
**[Test build #63898 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63898/consoleFull)**
for PR 14678 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63898/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75063736
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +161,147 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
**[Test build #63898 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63898/consoleFull)**
for PR 14678 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75063676
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +161,147 @@ private[spark] class
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14678
[MINOR][SQL] Add missing functions for some options in SQLConf and use them
where applicable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I first thought they are missing
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75063449
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +161,147 @@ private[spark] class
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75063156
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +161,147 @@ private[spark] class
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75063094
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +161,147 @@ private[spark] class
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75062850
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +161,147 @@ private[spark] class
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75062846
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +161,147 @@ private[spark] class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14539
How to specify `null` when we creating inline table?
```
sql(
"""
|create temporary view src as select * from values
|(201, null),
|(86,
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75062743
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +161,147 @@ private[spark] class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676#discussion_r75062469
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/inline-table.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+
+-- single row, without table and column alias
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676
**[Test build #63897 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63897/consoleFull)**
for PR 14676 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676
**[Test build #63896 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63896/consoleFull)**
for PR 14676 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14665
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14551
`model.gaussiansDF.show()` displays the `mean` and `variance` of the
gaussians, which are Dataframes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14665
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14648
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63892/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14648
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14648
**[Test build #63892 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63892/consoleFull)**
for PR 14648 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14660
**[Test build #63895 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63895/consoleFull)**
for PR 14660 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #63894 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63894/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14677
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14677
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63893/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14677
**[Test build #63893 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63893/consoleFull)**
for PR 14677 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14677
**[Test build #63893 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63893/consoleFull)**
for PR 14677 at commit
Github user mpjlu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14620
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63888/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14620
**[Test build #63888 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63888/consoleFull)**
for PR 14620 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14677
cc @srowen and @mvervuurt
I just opened this just for verifying duplicately again as I already did.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14677
[MINOR][DOC] Fix the descriptions for `properties` argument in the
documenation for jdbc APIs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This should be credited to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14648
**[Test build #63892 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63892/consoleFull)**
for PR 14648 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63889/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676
**[Test build #63889 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63889/consoleFull)**
for PR 14676 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
**[Test build #3224 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3224/consoleFull)**
for PR 14547 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63887/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676
**[Test build #63887 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63887/consoleFull)**
for PR 14676 at commit
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14639
Thanks @sun-rui Another commit resolved the downloading issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user sun-rui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14639
This is not only about the correct cache dir under MAC OS, but also in
yarn-cluster mode, there should not be downloading of Spark.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14675
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14670#discussion_r75052840
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameComplexTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -58,4 +59,43 @@ class DataFrameComplexTypeSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14675
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63885/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14670
can you add a link to the original PR? thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14675
**[Test build #63885 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63885/consoleFull)**
for PR 14675 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14639
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63891/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14639
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14639
**[Test build #63891 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63891/consoleFull)**
for PR 14639 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14639
**[Test build #63891 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63891/consoleFull)**
for PR 14639 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63890/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229
**[Test build #63890 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63890/consoleFull)**
for PR 14229 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14671
Yea unfortunately the row-by-row filtering doesn't make much sense in
Parquet.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zjffdu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14666#discussion_r75050631
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -159,55 +159,81 @@ sparkR.sparkContext <- function(
warning(paste("sparkPackages has no effect when using
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14359
**[Test build #63886 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63886/consoleFull)**
for PR 14359 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14359
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63886/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14359
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
@srowen Do you mean putting the validation back to method Vectors.sparse()
? The constructor of SparseVector is public, so I think we should keep the
validation in SparseVector rather than its
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14671#discussion_r75049585
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14674
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63882/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14674
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14674
**[Test build #63882 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63882/consoleFull)**
for PR 14674 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229
**[Test build #63890 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63890/consoleFull)**
for PR 14229 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14671
Thanks for cc me! As you might already know, I think it makes sense
allowing to filter rowgroups but this will be also applied to row-by-row for
normal parquet reader and this was removed by
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14670
@cloud-fan @rxin Is this test case what you suggested? I would appreciate
your comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229
**[Test build #63884 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63884/consoleFull)**
for PR 14229 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63884/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676
**[Test build #63889 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63889/consoleFull)**
for PR 14676 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14229
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63881/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14620
**[Test build #63888 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63888/consoleFull)**
for PR 14620 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14656
**[Test build #63881 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63881/consoleFull)**
for PR 14656 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676
cc @hvanhovell and @cloud-fan. I followed @cloud-fan's suggestion to use
the analyzer to replace inline tables with LocalRelation.
One thing that is broken about inline tables is SQL
1 - 100 of 549 matches
Mail list logo
