Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
I looked into this. I think there are two ways that you can intercept any
calls to HDFS.
The first way is slightly hacky but pretty simple.
FileSystem.addFileSystemForTesting is a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
**[Test build #65552 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65552/consoleFull)**
for PR 15133 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65552/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
**[Test build #65551 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65551/consoleFull)**
for PR 14959 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65551/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user phalodi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
Also change this one according to that now default value of app name is
(random) for session and context
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
**[Test build #65552 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65552/consoleFull)**
for PR 15133 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79297872
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -98,8 +98,12 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf) extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
**[Test build #65551 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65551/consoleFull)**
for PR 14959 at commit
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
@vanzin Thanks for your reviews. I just update the PR, but don't get your
following statement mean. Can you explain it ? Thanks
```
Especially since the Scala SparkContext clones the original
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
**[Test build #65550 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65550/consoleFull)**
for PR 15134 at commit
Github user phalodi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
@andrewor14 what is think about this
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134 we add random UUID of app name while
creating spark context if its not define.
---
If your project is set up for
GitHub user phalodi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
[SPARK-17580][CORE]Add random UUID as app name while app name not define
while creating â¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Assign Random UUID as a app name while app
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
Can you test this by deleting the file on purpose, and see what kind of
exceptions are thrown?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65548/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65548 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65548/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15127
**[Test build #65549 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65549/consoleFull)**
for PR 15127 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15129
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051#discussion_r79297392
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -694,8 +694,14 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
#' }
#' @note spark.mlp since 2.1.0
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051#discussion_r79297229
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -694,8 +694,14 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
#' }
#' @note spark.mlp since 2.1.0
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
@shivaram Thanks for cc'ing me. I will try to look closely within today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65547/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
**[Test build #65547 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65547/consoleFull)**
for PR 13513 at commit
Github user Praveenmail2him commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14600
Can anyone post the sample usage for this exception in Spark 2.0, I'm still
facing this exception?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79296707
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65548 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65548/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r7929
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -101,4 +101,47 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79296668
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -563,6 +563,13 @@ object SQLConf {
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79296634
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -87,19 +87,23 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf) extends
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79296629
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsColumnSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
@felixcheung
yeah, in fact 0x7FFF is not ideal because itself also a valid seed.
and there is another problem, in scala, seed is `long` type,
but in R side, it seems there is no
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051#discussion_r79295910
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -694,8 +694,14 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
#' }
#' @note spark.mlp since 2.1.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13513
**[Test build #65547 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65547/consoleFull)**
for PR 13513 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65546/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65546 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65546/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14643
@srowen You can take it over.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65546 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65546/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
LGTM - just a question above and this: would 0x7FFF be a good
placeholder value - is it possible to set seed to this in Scala?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051#discussion_r79294205
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -694,8 +694,14 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
#' }
#' @note spark.mlp since 2.1.0
Github user lovexi closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14338
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
Yep, saw that. I re-merged this, and yes during conflict resolution
QuantileSummaries.scala comes up as a file added only in the master branch, but
when I choose to not take the change in the IDE, I
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
I reverted already!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
Oh weird! no idea why that happened. Yeah I'll take care of it from here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
@HyukjinKwon @srowen
This PR when merged into branch-2.0 somehow created an empty file
QuantileSummaries.scala that is failing the lint test as the Apache license
header does not exist -
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
It looks like `addFile` isn't working on Windows because we try to convert
the windows file path into a URI and that fails. Not sure what the fix is in
this case.
cc @HyukjinKwon who
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
Yeah `SparkSession` will be the new thing moving forward. `SparkContext` is
kind of just a legacy thing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user phalodi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
@andrewor14 So as you suggest we also change it in spark context code
because right now we must set app name while creating spark context. So when we
add random UUID generate for default value of
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
We should probably just make it a random UUID in all cases to be
consistent. I don't know if people check whether `spark.app.name` is set, so
that might be a backward compatibility concern
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65544/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
**[Test build #65544 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65544/consoleFull)**
for PR 15132 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15043
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15043
I believe that this latest test failure is caused by a known flaky PySpark
test, so I'm going to merge this now and will monitor tests afterwards.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65539 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65539/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65539/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65545/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
**[Test build #65545 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65545/consoleFull)**
for PR 15133 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65541/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15043
**[Test build #65541 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65541/consoleFull)**
for PR 15043 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
**[Test build #65545 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65545/consoleFull)**
for PR 15133 at commit
GitHub user phalodi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15133
[SPARK-17578][Docs] Add spark.app.name default value for spark session
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify spark.app.name configuration for spark session
##
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15073
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65538/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15073
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15073
**[Test build #65538 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65538/consoleFull)**
for PR 15073 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65542/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65542 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65542/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65536/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15093
**[Test build #65536 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65536/consoleFull)**
for PR 15093 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14981
I am referring to
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201609.mbox/
I don't think it is up to us
Github user lresende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14981
The pointer is exactly your quote on the e-mail to legal-discuss:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited says:
-
CAN APACHE PROJECTS RELY ON COMPONENTS UNDER
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
**[Test build #65544 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65544/consoleFull)**
for PR 15132 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15097
Please add tests for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65543/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
**[Test build #65543 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65543/consoleFull)**
for PR 15132 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
**[Test build #65543 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65543/consoleFull)**
for PR 15132 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14981
That isn't the conclusion I took from the discussion on legal-discuss - do
you have a pointer? I took that it was at best ambiguous but not obviously
prohibited to distribute these because they are
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
[SPARK-17510][STREAMING][KAFKA] config max rate on a per-partition basis
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow configuration of max rate on a per-topicpartition
Github user lresende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14981
Yes, and this is the intent. It's ok to have these in the source release
(similar to ganglia) but we don't publish them in maven repository and it
becomes available only if people goes and
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
@felixcheung Now I add some test using default parameter and compare the
output prediction with the result generated using scala-side code.
thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65542 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65542/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65540 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65540/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65540/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15043
I agree that we should add more off-heap tests, but I'd like to do it in
another patch so that we can get this one merged faster to unblock the 2.0.1 RC.
In terms of testing off-heap, I
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14981
The issue is that this also removes the non assembly artifact from the
release. That does not seem to be strictly needed license wise. It is easy and
tidy though.
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15043
**[Test build #65541 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65541/consoleFull)**
for PR 15043 at commit
Github user lresende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14981
@srowen @rxin My understanding is that the mvn deploy is what takes care of
actually publishing the files to maven staging repository :
`
$MVN -DzincPort=$ZINC_PORT --settings
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15043
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13324
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65537/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo