Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66066/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286
**[Test build #66066 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66066/consoleFull)**
for PR 15286 at commit
[`59bfa23`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15264
That's a great explanation. Yes, this patch is really targeted at fixing
the second issue and it does seem like a subset of SPARK-16544. If you have
cycles towards working on a broader fix, it
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15078
From the discussion above, I would like to stay against this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15078
I'm not sure older Windows versions have powershell installed by default..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
**[Test build #66077 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66077/consoleFull)**
for PR 15263 at commit
[`15b38a8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15263
**[Test build #66076 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66076/consoleFull)**
for PR 15263 at commit
[`016f11d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15290
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user dafrista opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15290
[SPARK-17715] [Scheduler] Make task launch logs DEBUG
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Ramp down the task launch logs from INFO to DEBUG. Task launches can happen
order
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66064/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
**[Test build #66064 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66064/consoleFull)**
for PR 15248 at commit
[`07b78a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15288
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66072/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15288
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15288
**[Test build #66072 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66072/consoleFull)**
for PR 15288 at commit
[`5c50861`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15284
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66060/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897#discussion_r81044097
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2433,31 +2433,65 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15284
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15284
**[Test build #66060 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66060/consoleFull)**
for PR 15284 at commit
[`a3dce9f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14644
@mgummelt @srowen Please review as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15257#discussion_r81043337
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/literals.scala
---
@@ -60,6 +70,45 @@ object Literal {
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
**[Test build #66062 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66062/consoleFull)**
for PR 15248 at commit
[`a07ff90`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15257
**[Test build #66075 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66075/consoleFull)**
for PR 15257 at commit
[`c843840`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66062/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66049/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15269
**[Test build #66049 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66049/consoleFull)**
for PR 15269 at commit
[`e22b406`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15289#discussion_r81040912
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ object PushDownPredicate extends Rul
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15289
**[Test build #66074 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66074/consoleFull)**
for PR 15289 at commit
[`87504e4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
Hi, @tgravescs
[SPARK-17714](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17714) has been
created for further investigation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r81040313
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66059/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15289
[SPARK-17712][SQL] Fix invalid pushdown of data-independent filters beneath
aggregates
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes a minor correctness issue impa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15247
**[Test build #66059 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66059/consoleFull)**
for PR 15247 at commit
[`67ea2de`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66068/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66068 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66068/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`f82f3fe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15257#discussion_r81033312
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/literals.scala
---
@@ -60,6 +70,45 @@ object Literal {
}
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15208
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15208
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15287
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
**[Test build #66073 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66073/consoleFull)**
for PR 15248 at commit
[`4ea20b5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15287
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15282
Merging in branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r81036771
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -592,34 +587,54 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
* fa
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15288
@jkbradley I checked the other algorithms for similar issues.
`ml.LinearRegression` and `ml.evaluation.*` already cast Labels to
`DoubleType`, but `GeneralizedLinearRegression` did have errors
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15078
FWIW, doesn't Power shell allows executing bash? (I haven't tried that by
myself but I think I saw some usages and documentation before)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15288
**[Test build #66072 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66072/consoleFull)**
for PR 15288 at commit
[`5c50861`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
GitHub user BryanCutler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15288
[SPARK-17697][ML] Fixed bug in summary calculations that pattern match
against label without casting
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In calling LogisticRegression.evalua
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15264
I wouldn't stay against this if you strongly this one is a right fix. We
could go merging this and then introduce a general upcasting logic later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15287
**[Test build #66071 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66071/consoleFull)**
for PR 15287 at commit
[`5e5a6f1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15264
Hi @sameeragarwal , I just meant if we want to read new and old Parquet
files (one having int and one having long for the same column) described in the
JIRA and PR description, we could do one o
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r81035029
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -478,8 +473,8 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15287
[SPARK-17713] [SQL] Move row-datasource related tests out of JDBCSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As a followup for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15273 we shou
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66070/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
**[Test build #66070 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66070/consoleFull)**
for PR 14553 at commit
[`6334a4b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
**[Test build #66070 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66070/consoleFull)**
for PR 14553 at commit
[`6334a4b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
Thanks all for handling this edge case! Coming late to the
discussion...but I like the decisions made here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14872
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14872
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66067/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14872
**[Test build #66067 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66067/consoleFull)**
for PR 14872 at commit
[`ee56ffe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15047
**[Test build #66069 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66069/consoleFull)**
for PR 15047 at commit
[`238dbb8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15047
jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15047
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15047
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66058/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15047
**[Test build #66058 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66058/consoleFull)**
for PR 15047 at commit
[`238dbb8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286
@JoshRosen Yes. The title has been changed.
@tgravescs Yes. Now I am creating a separate jira to investigate this more.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
**[Test build #66068 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66068/consoleFull)**
for PR 15148 at commit
[`f82f3fe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286
Can you change the JIRA number to SPARK-17710, which is the JIRA that I
created for this build break?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17710
---
If your project is set up for
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81031684
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
@jkbradley I see. Thanks Joseph!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15282
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66056/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15282
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14872
**[Test build #66067 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66067/consoleFull)**
for PR 14872 at commit
[`ee56ffe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15282
**[Test build #66056 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66056/consoleFull)**
for PR 15282 at commit
[`dde4834`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286
Yes. The title has been changed. Thanks. @tgravescs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66063/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
**[Test build #66063 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66063/consoleFull)**
for PR 15248 at commit
[`d81d9d5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286
changes look fine, waiting on Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286
Also please file a separate jira to investigate more. Link it to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15857 and if needed we pull in
people more familiar with the Repl classloader stuff.
Github user jodersky commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15078
How wide-spread is powershell on windows computers? I assume that modern
versions ship with it, but I also heard that they come with a bash-like shell
in the latest version. Does the current build
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286
please change [Follow UP] to [HOTFIX]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14872
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user cjjnjust commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172#discussion_r81030532
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/aes/SparkAesCipher.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
> Our use case is mainly using similarity join to find fraud trips. I think
I can change the NN-search to only single-probing NN search of dataframe if you
think it's fine. What do you think?
Github user jodersky commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15062
Oh, I was too quick to comment, I see a complete description is in the JIRA.
It would still be good if you could add a test though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
Thanks @tgravescs yes. I have created a PR
[15286](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148#discussion_r81029208
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user jodersky commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15062
I don't quite understand what use-case this patch fixes. Can you provide an
example (in the form of a test) that reproduces the issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286
**[Test build #66066 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66066/consoleFull)**
for PR 15286 at commit
[`59bfa23`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user Sherry302 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15286
[SPARK-16757][Follow UP] Fix ClassCircularityError in ReplSuite tests in
Maven build: use 'Class.forName' instead of 'Utils.classForName'
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
F
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15281
Looks fine but I second Reynold's question. Sounds like no modifications
from your summary.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user loneknightpy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
[SPARK-17711] Compress rolled executor log
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds support for executor log compression.
## How was this patch tested
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15148
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
101 - 200 of 491 matches
Mail list logo
