Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15495
@gatorsmile @yhuai Many thanks !!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
As discussed previously, R 3.3.1 works. For 3.3.0, `NA` is serialized but
it is not serialized as `String`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
did this change in a recent R version ? I'm not sure why `NA` is not being
serialized ? That `if` statement should only affect the value assigned to
`type` right ?
---
If your project is set up
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
@shivaram I think we can use that test case. Somehow, I missed the debug
message of [3] and [4], but it should not be quite related. The reason should
be my `serialize` function, as shown
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
I think the reason is because of the code below:
`> serialize
function (object, connection, ascii = FALSE, xdr = TRUE, version = NULL,
refhook = NULL)
{
if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15527
**[Test build #67113 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67113/consoleFull)**
for PR 15527 at commit
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15527
[SPARK-17813][SQL][KAFKA] Maximum data per trigger
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
maxOffsetsPerTrigger option for rate limiting, proportionally based on
volume of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15520
**[Test build #67112 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67112/consoleFull)**
for PR 15520 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15520
cc @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67108/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
**[Test build #67108 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67108/consoleFull)**
for PR 15417 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
**[Test build #67111 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67111/consoleFull)**
for PR 15525 at commit
Github user loneknightpy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
@tdas Addressed your comments, please take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67106/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
**[Test build #67106 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67106/consoleFull)**
for PR 15285 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67105/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481
**[Test build #67105 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67105/consoleFull)**
for PR 15481 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15526
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user drewrobb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15526
[SPARK-17986] [ML] SQLTransformer should remove temporary tables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A call to the method `SQLTransformer.transform` previously would
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15500#discussion_r83781558
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -77,9 +77,40 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67107/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15519
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15519
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67104/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
**[Test build #67107 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67107/consoleFull)**
for PR 15525 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15519
**[Test build #67104 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67104/consoleFull)**
for PR 15519 at commit
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15500
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417#discussion_r83781091
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveNaturalJoinSuite.scala
---
@@ -31,39 +31,46 @@ class
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417#discussion_r83781262
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/BooleanSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -91,51 +99,51 @@ class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15500#discussion_r83781352
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -77,9 +77,40 @@ case class ProjectExec(projectList:
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417#discussion_r83781173
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/AggregateOptimizeSuite.scala
---
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ class
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15518
Seems this fails the scala style check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15518
Oops - just realized the tests for the latest commit failed. I will revert
the patch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15266
Any other comment? @cloud-fan Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
@jiangxb1987 Can you leave a comment on the PR changes to explain why you
made these changes? You know, reviewing these changes is not easy. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15459
@yhuai Any further comment about it? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15512
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67102/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
cc @cloud-fan @davies @sameeragarwal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15512
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15512
**[Test build #67102 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67102/consoleFull)**
for PR 15512 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #67110 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67110/consoleFull)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67110/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #67110 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67110/consoleFull)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14847
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14847
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67103/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15518
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14847
**[Test build #67103 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67103/consoleFull)**
for PR 14847 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15407
@rxin @tdas right now, items to be committed can be added to the queue, but
they will never actually be removed from the queue. poll() removes, iterator()
does not. I updated the description of
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15518
LGTM - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67109/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #67109 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67109/consoleFull)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15471
@falaki looks like the SparkR MLlib unit tests are timing out on Jenkins.
Do they pass on your machine ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15407
@koeninger can you put more information into the description of the pull
request? At the very least we should talk about the current implementation
causes memory leaks.
---
If your project is set
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
@wzhfy
Ok, the code has been modified
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #67109 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67109/consoleFull)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423#discussion_r8378
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -651,14 +651,28 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15495
Merging to master! Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15495
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15500#discussion_r83777528
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -77,9 +77,40 @@ case class ProjectExec(projectList:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517#discussion_r83776817
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/QueryExecution.scala ---
@@ -61,17 +61,16 @@ class QueryExecution(val sparkSession:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15519
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67101/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15519
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15519
**[Test build #67101 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67101/consoleFull)**
for PR 15519 at commit
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15512
I also think that the time saved is all the registration which can be
skipped, but did not verify.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
**[Test build #67108 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67108/consoleFull)**
for PR 15417 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319
This PR is ready for review, would anyone look at it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
@gatorsmile This PR is ready for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15512#discussion_r83774753
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -77,14 +78,12 @@ private[spark] class DirectTaskResult[T](
*
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15512#discussion_r83774768
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetter.scala ---
@@ -84,6 +90,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskResultGetter(sparkEnv:
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
@rxin What do we need to update to make this PR accepted? Please give some
advice, many thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
**[Test build #67107 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67107/consoleFull)**
for PR 15525 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15414
@jkbradley @yanboliang Could you please have a review of this? This PR
unify usage of labelCol casting and fixs a bug described in
[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17797]
---
If
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
[SPARK-17985][CORE] Bump commons-lang3 version to 3.5.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`SerializationUtils.clone()` of commons-lang3 (<3.5) has a bug that breaks
thread
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15522#discussion_r83773809
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -422,8 +422,8 @@ In the simplest form, the default data source
(`parquet` unless otherwise config
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
There are many unnecessary changes, can you recover them to minimize diff?
That'll be easier for others to review. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481
**[Test build #67105 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67105/consoleFull)**
for PR 15481 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
**[Test build #67106 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67106/consoleFull)**
for PR 15285 at commit
Github user scwf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15407
Can you explain what is the memory that can currently leak with the
iterator?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15519
**[Test build #67104 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67104/consoleFull)**
for PR 15519 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15519
@lw-lin Fixed the bug.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user naliazheli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
LGTM.
Util this issue is resolved,I can only do Dataset.toRdd.checkpoint() to
avoid the growing time of qurry plan.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user weiqingy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15522#discussion_r83772075
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ In the simplest form, the default data source
(`parquet` unless otherwise config
You
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15471
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67091/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15471
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15519#discussion_r83771979
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamSuite.scala ---
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ class StreamSuite extends StreamTest {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15471
**[Test build #67091 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67091/consoleFull)**
for PR 15471 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67099/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15500
also cc @cloud-fan @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
**[Test build #67099 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67099/consoleFull)**
for PR 15285 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15521#discussion_r83771452
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/TableFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -49,13 +49,18 @@ class TableFileCatalog(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15266
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15266
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67098/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 563 matches
Mail list logo
