Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
**[Test build #67172 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67172/consoleFull)**
for PR 15546 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481
**[Test build #67173 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67173/consoleFull)**
for PR 15481 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532#discussion_r84001226
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/array.sql ---
@@ -71,6 +71,10 @@ select
sort_array(timestamp_array)
from primitive_arrays;
Github user scwf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481
Updated, can you review again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67167/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83996049
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84000957
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83997822
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83998311
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -109,6 +108,85 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83996692
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83998150
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83996326
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83995317
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83998358
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1342,6 +1342,19 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83995649
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83995590
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83995463
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83996865
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83998964
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -250,24 +248,26 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83995119
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83999715
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83996351
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532
**[Test build #67167 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67167/consoleFull)**
for PR 15532 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83998916
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -60,7 +58,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83995208
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83995189
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15542
**[Test build #67171 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67171/consoleFull)**
for PR 15542 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #67159 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67159/consoleFull)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67159/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r8416
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83999827
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user zhzhan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83999756
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83999452
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550#discussion_r83999445
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDSuite.scala ---
@@ -833,6 +833,30 @@ class RDDSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
SharedSparkContext
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550#discussion_r83999283
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDSuite.scala ---
@@ -833,6 +833,30 @@ class RDDSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
SharedSparkContext {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67165/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
**[Test build #67165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67165/consoleFull)**
for PR 15546 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550#discussion_r83998814
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ZippedWithIndexRDD.scala
---
@@ -64,8 +64,14 @@ class ZippedWithIndexRDD[T: ClassTag](prev: RDD[T])
extends
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83998771
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550#discussion_r83998765
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ZippedWithIndexRDD.scala
---
@@ -64,8 +64,14 @@ class ZippedWithIndexRDD[T: ClassTag](prev: RDD[T])
extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15297
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83998540
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15297
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67162/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15297
**[Test build #67162 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67162/consoleFull)**
for PR 15297 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67166/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
**[Test build #67166 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67166/consoleFull)**
for PR 15546 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
**[Test build #67170 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67170/consoleFull)**
for PR 15550 at commit
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
[SPARK-18003][Spark Core] Fix bug of RDD zipWithIndex generating wrong
result when one partition contains more than 2147483647 records
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user zhzhan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83998058
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mariobriggs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15534
thanks. Sounds possible. Let me try it that way with my app and i can then
close this as required.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544#discussion_r83997249
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/HyperLogLogPlusPlus.scala
---
@@ -142,319 +84,37 @@ case class
Github user zhzhan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83997070
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15534
If a job is submitted and there is no task start update for a while?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481#discussion_r83996798
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ class
Github user ahshahid closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15549
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mariobriggs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15534
>>
The user can track this pretty easily themselves, can't they?
<<
Can you explain a little more on your line of thinking here? I am more
than happy to not have this code added if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15549
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67160/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539
**[Test build #67160 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67160/consoleFull)**
for PR 15539 at commit
GitHub user ahshahid opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15549
Bootstrap perf
reducing the generated code for struct, if the field elements of the struct
are of same primitive data type.
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83996232
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
@rxin I submitted a new pr #15548. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15547
**[Test build #67169 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67169/consoleFull)**
for PR 15547 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15548
**[Test build #67168 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67168/consoleFull)**
for PR 15548 at commit
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15548
[SPARK-17985][CORE] Bump commons-lang3 version to 3.5.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`SerializationUtils.clone()` of commons-lang3 (<3.5) has a bug that breaks
thread
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15547
[SPARK-18002][SQL] Pruning unnecessary IsNotNull predicates from Filter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `PruneFilters` rule, we can prune unnecessary `IsNotNull`
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83995415
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15540#discussion_r83995294
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -421,9 +421,10 @@ In the simplest form, the default data source
(`parquet` unless otherwise config
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
I see. I'll submit soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15540
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r83995272
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15543
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15543
Actually I'm guessing it is Tommy Yu
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15543
@Wenpei what's your apache jira id? I need that in order to assign the
ticket to you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15543
Merging in master/branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
Ah alright thanks. Can you submit a new pr so I can merge it again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15540#discussion_r83994842
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -421,9 +421,10 @@ In the simplest form, the default data source
(`parquet` unless otherwise config
Github user zhzhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
@rxin @gatorsmile Can you please take a look, and kindly provide your
comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15545
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67163/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15545
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15545
**[Test build #67163 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67163/consoleFull)**
for PR 15545 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532
**[Test build #67167 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67167/consoleFull)**
for PR 15532 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67157/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
**[Test build #67157 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67157/consoleFull)**
for PR 15541 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67164/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
**[Test build #67164 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67164/consoleFull)**
for PR 15544 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user YuhuWang2002 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15297
following the review commentï¼ I rewrite code for read a range of
mapsãlike thisï¼
class BlockStoreShuffleReader[K, C](
handle: BaseShuffleHandle[K, _, C],
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
**[Test build #67166 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67166/consoleFull)**
for PR 15546 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15542
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67161/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15542
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15542
**[Test build #67161 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67161/consoleFull)**
for PR 15542 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
**[Test build #67165 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67165/consoleFull)**
for PR 15546 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546
Ooops. Thank you for fixing me! @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
1 - 100 of 543 matches
Mail list logo
