Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15535
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67140/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15535
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15407
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15407
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15490#discussion_r83950235
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -262,6 +263,17 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(con
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15407
Thanks for the explanation. Merging in master/branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user drewrobb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15526
@yanboliang would you be able to review this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15535
**[Test build #67141 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67141/consoleFull)**
for PR 15535 at commit
[`9549e58`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15535
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
Actually I'm seeing the following exceptions locally as well as on Jenkins
for Hadoop 2.2:
```
[error]
/scratch/rxin/spark/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala:1489:
valu
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
@rxin Can you take a look once again.
Note that there is a separate PR for the same changes in branch-2.0 (with
different Mima excludes) - https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15535/files
---
If y
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15450
I don't feel strongly either way, but I don't like the potential of this:
scala
model.getK
scala> 3
model.clusterCenters.length
scala> 1
Should we conside
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15521
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15521
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67137/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15521
**[Test build #67137 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67137/consoleFull)**
for PR 15521 at commit
[`5088ae0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15535
**[Test build #67140 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67140/consoleFull)**
for PR 15535 at commit
[`0fe56d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15529
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15529
Thanks! Close it now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15499
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15512
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15535
[SPARK-17731][SQL][STREAMING][FOLLOWUP] Refactored StreamingQueryListener
APIs for branch-2.0
This is the branch-2.0 PR of #15530 to make the APIs consistent with the
master. Since these APIs are exp
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15499
Merging in master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15512
LGTM. Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481#discussion_r83946127
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -92,19 +92,19 @@ class CoarseGrainedSchedulerBac
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15481#discussion_r83946120
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -392,9 +392,23 @@ class CoarseGrainedSchedulerBa
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15514
cc @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67134/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15522
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
**[Test build #67134 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67134/consoleFull)**
for PR 15285 at commit
[`4ead779`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15522
Merging in master/branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15533
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67135/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15533
Merging in master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
**[Test build #67135 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67135/consoleFull)**
for PR 15285 at commit
[`1e3302d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15534
The user can track this pretty easily themselves, can't they?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15533
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67136/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15533
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15533
**[Test build #67136 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67136/consoleFull)**
for PR 15533 at commit
[`699bce5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
**[Test build #67139 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67139/consoleFull)**
for PR 15530 at commit
[`0257b9e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user itg-abby commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496
It is possible that I am missing something or that I have unintentionally
obfuscated this pull request, I will try summarizing my understanding/purpose
and see if it sheds any light:
Dense
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13526
cc @cloud-fan
This looks good to me -- but I don't remember why we didn't merge it
earlier already.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14947
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user weiqingy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15522#discussion_r83941926
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -422,8 +422,8 @@ In the simplest form, the default data source
(`parquet` unless otherwise config
You ca
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14947
Merging this into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15467
@ericl thank you very much
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67133/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
**[Test build #67133 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67133/consoleFull)**
for PR 15285 at commit
[`b3041b7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15475
**[Test build #67138 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67138/consoleFull)**
for PR 15475 at commit
[`2581380`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15475
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532#discussion_r83930227
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -124,7 +124,14 @@ case class SortArray(base:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14947
**[Test build #67131 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67131/consoleFull)**
for PR 14947 at commit
[`bd5a63d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15382#discussion_r83928417
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
C
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14947
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67131/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14947
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532#discussion_r83927813
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/collectionOperations.scala
---
@@ -124,7 +124,14 @@ case class SortArray
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r83927478
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1166,26 +1166,33 @@ setMethod("take",
collect(limited)
})
-#' Head
-#'
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r83927201
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1166,26 +1166,33 @@ setMethod("take",
collect(limited)
})
-#' Head
-#'
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r83926993
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1166,26 +1166,33 @@ setMethod("take",
collect(limited)
})
-#' Head
-#'
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
could you update the JIRA and PR to reflect what's being added here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15534
You are introducing 2 new events but they are not being consumed. Do you
plan to use those anywhere ? Whats is use case that you are trying to solve ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15534
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15450
Heh, I believe the PC term is 'corner cases'. I agree. There's not much
point in clustering data to k centroids when there are <= k distinct points. I
think that's all the more reasons to not make th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user mariobriggs opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15534
[SPARK-17917][Scheduler] Fire SparkListenerTasksStarved event when
submitted tasks are starved beyond the configured starvation timeout
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #67132 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67132/consoleFull)**
for PR 15009 at commit
[`58c6bac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67132/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
**[Test build #67135 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67135/consoleFull)**
for PR 15285 at commit
[`1e3302d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user koertkuipers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15382#discussion_r83921525
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable wi
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15516#discussion_r83921132
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -795,6 +795,8 @@ test_that("cache(), persist(), and unpersist() on a
DataFrame", {
pers
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15521
**[Test build #67137 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67137/consoleFull)**
for PR 15521 at commit
[`5088ae0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15516#discussion_r83920746
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -654,6 +654,33 @@ setMethod("unpersist",
x
})
+#' StorageLevel
+#'
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15521#discussion_r83919797
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/TableFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -49,13 +49,18 @@ class TableFileCatalog(
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15521#discussion_r83919804
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/CacheManager.scala ---
@@ -185,9 +185,10 @@ class CacheManager extends Logging {
plan
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15521#discussion_r83919788
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetadataCacheSuite.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +95,19 @@ class HiveMetadataCacheSuite extends QueryTest
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15533
Can you put the proper description here still? It becomes part of the
commit msg.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67129/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
@srowen Unfortunately the 'Some' in the == is usually missed out, resulting
in bugs (and we have had a fair share of them in the past - some more severe
than others).
Given that there is no supp
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15533
**[Test build #67136 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67136/consoleFull)**
for PR 15533 at commit
[`699bce5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15533
[SPARK-17974] (try 2) Refactor FileCatalog classes to simplify the
inheritance tree
This is just https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15518 which got reverted
for a scalastyle bug. @rxin
You can m
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532
**[Test build #67129 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67129/consoleFull)**
for PR 15532 at commit
[`5f73245`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
Let the religious wars commence. If Option is a "collection of 0 or 1
things" then `.contains` at least makes some sense, if a bit obtuse. I still
think `== Some(x)` is clearer anyway.
---
If your
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15490
Oh, I see, new UI had meant I'd left the comment partially incomplete.
Sorry. Just the one: printing out the actual log dir location. That makes it
much easier to identify a configuration prob
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15490#discussion_r83530966
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -262,6 +263,17 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530#discussion_r83915869
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryListener.scala
---
@@ -41,24 +41,24 @@ abstract class StreamingQueryListener {
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
I disagree. It makes it very confusing, especially without explicit types,
to know what exactly is happening. Not everything should be a monad.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15528
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
**[Test build #67134 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67134/consoleFull)**
for PR 15285 at commit
[`4ead779`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285#discussion_r83914442
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1452,52 +1452,54 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
CallSite(short
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15528
Merging in master.
Do we need this for branch-2.0 as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285#discussion_r83914169
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1452,52 +1452,54 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
CallSite(short
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15529
Can you close the ticket?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
301 - 400 of 558 matches
Mail list logo
